|
Look at the series starting with this article:
Learning MVC - Part 1: Introduction to MVC Architecture and Separation of Concerns[^]
IMHO, none of the single parts makes it into an article (we actually have to open a 'slideshow' category for these)... Maybe combined (and 95% of the images replaced with some work)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you.
But I was told by Chris that articles is the default cathegory, if it doesn't fits the "consumable in 30 seconds" then it should be an article.
In this case I haven't checked all the items in the serie, but the first one I would place it more in "poor quality" than in "worng type" kind of report.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And the first is maybe have the most quality... others are going than and in the middle there are parts that no more than image gallery... And the 'author' shows-off with thousands of reputation points (that probably helped him to gain MVP too) from this poor quality... Very disappointing...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: And the 'author' shows-off with thousands of reputation points (that probably helped him to gain MVP too)
Account is a group with almost 500 members. That can give some help with friends.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: from this poor quality... Very disappointing...
sadly not the only case.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This is well below the usual quality for Akhil. I'm surprised.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I hope it doesn't get approved like this.
Famous last words. It has been approved with the messy code blocks intact. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Blind approvers  
Maybe giving no rep points for approvals would help in this?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Better? I think?
I'm not sure why there code snippets aren't scrolling. That's why the remaining one looks messed up.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Yea... much better...
only a tiny thing more... the snippet in Step 5 "a bit" too far right indented and makes it a bit difficult to be read
I know, I know... I sometimes am a bit too perfectionist (or picky  )
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's the scrolling problem. If it scrolled it wouldn't be a problem. For some reason, that's exactly how he wanted his spacing to be. But I betrayed his dreams and formatted it again.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: For some reason, that's exactly how he wanted his spacing to be.
I know... many people do it like that
var variable = function_call(function_param1(),
function_param2(),
function_param3());
I actually like it, but publishing in web... people should use the preview or review after publishing that everything is shown as it should
Pity is... in Blogs under moderation is mostly not possible to use the message board to speak with the author
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me reason with proof , why my article was delete after a long week of published.
|
|
|
|
|
Most deletions are due to the reports of the community. Since your account is still alive, I can exclude offenses like spam / site driving / plagiarism and things like that.
But there are still reasons to get an article vanished as "poor quality", "incomplete / unclear", "misleading", "off-topic"...
I can't tell you the reason because it is already gone, now only CP Staff can.
But you should have received an email informing you about it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
But I cant understand one thing why it was deleted after more than two weeks.
If it was not fit to article section then it can be deleted before publish.
If THIS THINGS WILL HAPPEN Then the interest of publish articles and blogs etc is going down and down and our start up team also suffering due to this.
|
|
|
|
|
Writing on bold or "shouting" on capital letters won't give you more right.
Satyaprakash Samantaray wrote: But I cant understand one thing why it was deleted after more than two weeks.
Maybe because it took two weeks to get enough people thinking the same.
Satyaprakash Samantaray wrote: If it was not fit to article section then it can be deleted before publish.
Unluckily we have some blind "approvers", which leads to situations like this one. We try to avoid it, but it is difficult. It happens with spam as well... sometimes it get through too, and the community reacts later (there are cases where the spam remains years undetected)
Satyaprakash Samantaray wrote: If THIS THINGS WILL HAPPEN AND the interest of publish articles and blogs is going down and down and our team also suffering due to this.
Experience with spammers, plagiarists and other really bad "apportations" shows that the interest of people wanting to publish things doesn't get lower. The community just try to keep a better quality on what get published.
On the other hand... I can't really think on a good reason why your team has to "suffer" just because that article got deleted.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Nelek ,
I never shouting first thing. You people give me the oppertunity to be a member of CodeProject.
I am very grateful that i am a member of codeproject .
Just help me tips for write article and blogs and steps to publish.
In blogs writing it asking for some rss feed , This point i am confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Please stop shouting, i.e. using bold text. You have been given an explanation of why the article was removed, and advice on how to learn from the experience. You now have the opportunity to take steps to write something better in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: You have been given an explanation
Actually 3 here, one in article message board before got nuked and the automatic email when it got deleted... 
I'll get my coat
Have a nice weekend
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Mr. Richard for your kind information . Please help me out how to write better article and
Steps for publish my articles in CodeProject.
Also I confuse about how to publish my blogs .
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a site admin but was able to find a deleted article using Google:
Quote: Closed because this item's quality is too poor to be published. Reported by xxx, yyy , zzz on Friday, January 20, 2017 7:07am
There is also a comment by a reputable CP member (who has not reported the article probably to give you a chance to enhance your article):
Quote: Please ... take some time to view a few articles on Code Project before posting your own, this post does not meet the standards of Code Project in content and formatting.
The above comment answers your question.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are referring to this[^] article, then I am surprised it was even published. If you take out the Visual Studio images, you don't even have half a page of text. If you look at articles by the likes of Marc Clifton, Sacha Barber or Paulo Zemek, you will see that they are much more in depth. At best, what you published was a tip.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
It'll get approved, I suspect - which is fine - but it's another eye-bleed colour scheme; please don your welding goggles before visiting: Most Complete Selenium WebDriver C# Cheat Sheet[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
