|
No, the real corrected code is:
rText2 = myCurrentDate.ToString("dddd")
Custom Date and Time Format Strings | Microsoft Docs[^]
Or, if you really want to pad the code out:
rText2 = System.Globalization.DateTimeFormatInfo.CurrentInfo.GetDayName(myCurrentDate.DayOfWeek)
The vast majority of the Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly is just there for backwards-compatibility with VB6, and should be avoided wherever possible. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Richard! Helpful as always...I knew there had to be a better way!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
string isValidArticle(string article) - The Daily WTF[^]
A Zero-Day exploit in the .NET framework through the WSDL parser.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
We need a new icon for "coding horror". Perhaps a WTF with its hair standing on end?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I've always had this standard of code that I thought was "Microsoft quality". Granted, given the number of bugs and "features over fix" commonly found in Microsoft products, this bar was not set high.
This ... "sample", for lack of a sufficiently derogatory term, just jumps on that bar and smashes it into the ground.
How the ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) that code ever made it past review, let alone testing, is beyond my too-early-in-the-morning-on-a-weekend comprehension.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a shame the article doesn't quite explain the problem properly.
The code is generating a verbatim string literal, so newlines in the string don't need to be encoded or escaped.
Source:
This is a perfectly valid
verbatim string literal
across multiple lines. Output:
string foo = @"This is a perfectly valid
verbatim string literal
across multiple lines.";
Unfortunately, that string literal ends up being placed in a single-line comment, which only comments out the first line. 
Source:
This is a commented-out verbatim string literal.
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("evil-code.exe");
// Output:
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("evil-code.exe");
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good find by the hackers, just reading the code made me really cringe, mainly because I'm nowhere near awake enough to parse it correctly. Whether it's a gross missnaming or the devs not checking what isValidURL() actually validates one can be certain oversights were made.
I'm in the middle of refactoring some css to make it clear and this article is yet another validation to striving to name things to the best of ones ability. My issue is naturally trivial in comparison and there is zero possibility of failing in such an impactful way, but clear code speaks for itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from being badly named and using a global static that code is not too bad.
The code that is the real hair-raiser is the code that assumes it is safe to comment it out using a single line comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing is global in .NET; also, a single static StringBuilder is not going to consume large amounts of memory.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
After finding this ultra-cool Bootstrap `DateTimePicker`, I thought I could simply select all my date-pickers by class, and apply the relevant code for the `DateTimePicker`, and I’d have elegant and working date-time pickers all over.
That was during that usual “honeymoon” period when you’ve just found a really cool hammer and can only see nails. That period passes quite quickly and then we’re left to deal with little niggly wrinkles to iron out on your new widget.
The first and biggest is that MVC “has already” turned one of my date-time inputs into a built-in browser native date picker. On Edge and Chrome the built-in picker is usable, but not good UX and somewhat unintuitive. I don’t know how other browsers present date and time pickers. If a model property is of `DateTime`, MVC scaffolds an input with type `datetime-local`, and lets the browser deal with the rest.
The code to initialize the DateTimePicker is normally simple, just call on your date-time input, like this:
$(".date-picker").datetimepicker();
Now when I did that, something weird happened. When I clicked any date-picker (input with class `date-picker`), I’d see two date-pickers: My new fancy one in the background, and overlaid on top of that, the browser date-picker – in my case Edge.
I have to first make the input a normal text input, and then the fancy DateTimePicker, for things to work as wanted, with the 3rd party date-picker in charge:
$(".date-picker").attr("type", "text");
$(".date-picker").datetimepicker();
Now I have one last “little” problem. When I click on one of my date-picklers, I get a history dropdown of recently used dates, but I suspect it is the browser’s date-picker doing this, because it drops down over my date-picker rendering it useless. Fortunately, a second click shows my date-picker without the dropdown.
"'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself."
—Aleister Crowley
|
|
|
|
|
somehow weired. Is the code correct? 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
What code? My little two lines of JS that fix things? There is no other code involved in this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: I don’t know how other browsers present date and time pickers.
Can I use... Date and time input types[^]
<input type="date"> - HTML | MDN[^]
IE, Firefox and Safari currently don't support them at all. Support is apparently being added in Firefox 57.
Brady Kelly wrote:
$(".date-picker").attr("type", "text");
That's going to break in old versions of IE - v8 and earlier, IIRC. If you need to support those older versions, you need to replace the <input> element, rather than changing its type.
Brady Kelly wrote: When I click on one of my date-picklers, I get a history dropdown of recently used dates,
Sounds like you need to disable autocomplete. Add autocomplete="off" to the attributes:
@Html.EditorFor(m => m.YourDateField, new { htmlAttributes = new { autocomplete = "off" } })
It would probably be easier to create a custom editor template for DateTime values:
ASP.NET MVC display and editor templates - Growing with the Web[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all the info. I suppose I should test on more than just Edge and Firefox, but it's a hobby project.
I don't care if anything IE8 or prior breaks, so replacing the type is good for me, but the best is the autocomplete. I never knew there was such and attribute, thanks.
It has crossed my mind several times to use a template, but I want to get the rendered HTML correct first.
"'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself."
—Aleister Crowley
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: How am I supposed to check my lottery numbers?
Why are you playing the lottery in the first place?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
It's been so long since ASP.NET MVC is in place in people still struggle to turn off yellow screen of death in production
|
|
|
|
|
Darn you to Yuma!
I have been doing some work with Extension Methods for Regular Expressions in .net this week.
One in particular can be used like this:
MatchCollection m = somestring.Matches ( somepattern ) ;
This works fine. The method instantiates a Regex object for the specified pattern and returns the result of Matches ( somestring ). I've been using this for a while now.
Buuut... today I discovered that the MatchCollection and Match classes don't provide access to the Regex object that produced them! Which means I can't iterate the group names -- only the Regex class provides the GetGroupNames() method. (They both have private a field for the Regex.)
Regex.GetGroupNames Method (System.Text.RegularExpressions)[^]
So, when I need to iterate the group names, I can't use my Extension Method. 
|
|
|
|
|
You could download the .NET core source code and fix it 
|
|
|
|
|
Yuma.... how cruel your judgments. 
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: So, when I need to iterate the group names, I can't use my Extension Method.
Why not?
Match theMatch = ...;
foreach (Group g in theMatch.Groups)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{g.Name}: {g.Value}");
}
Match.Groups property[^]
Group.Name property[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Version Information
Available since 4.7
No use to me.
|
|
|
|
|
What, you mean you don't upgrade to the latest version the second it's released? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
