|
|
Take What are the advantages of a luxuryxs hearing aid?[^] as an example. If I was one of the first three to report it, then I'd presumably see the shield so I could proceed to administer a kick to the perpetrator. But, as a Johnny-come-lately, I can't contribute to the (I assume) ten kicks required to complete the extermination.
Or am I totally confuzzled as to how it all works now?
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: If I was one of the first three to report it, then I'd presumably see the shield
Where is this information?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
From the thread below Chris's comment[^]
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: as a Johnny-come-lately, I can't contribute to the (I assume) ten kicks required to complete the extermination
That's an excellent point.
If the item is closed and the member not, then that leaves the member open to mischief.
I'll add a link to profiles if that member has been reported.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exact 
Dudn't thought it was so old.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Dear CP Team
I know I know, I am a tedious/irritating/cumbersome (there are at least ten more in LEO...), strange customer.
Nonetheless, a request: Please give me 0x01AA back. Many Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice to have you back again, Bruno. Your account has been reactivated.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you so much! And again, sorry that I'm so strange. 0x01AB disapears now.
BTW: Is CPa drug and should be under medical supervision?
Bruno
|
|
|
|
|
Never apologise for being You. You’re always welcome here.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again! Your team and you are really great!
A minor thing: I can not vote, it always Shows me "You must have a confirmed email address to vote".
[Edit]Solved[/Edit]
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent a reconfirmation email to you. Just click the link and you're good to go.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AB wrote: sorry that I'm so strange
Not really. You make have to make more effort.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I try my best 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
We launched these two features a week ago. Is anyone seeing any issues, have any comments, or have any suggestions on changes you'd like to see made?
The bigger question is: are you using it, or possibly: did you even notice it.
It's a subtle visual change that hides a massive change underneath.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed the blue "follow" button that appears everywhere, but to be honest... no need of it
About the read later... didn't notice it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Read later I'm going to use, but I think I will unfollow what I have followed.
The difference between: "Chris Maunder has posted a reply to a message at..." and "Chris Maunder has posted a reply to your message at..." is a bit to small for my taste.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: The difference between: "Chris Maunder has posted a reply to a message at..." and "Chris Maunder has posted a reply to your message at..." is a bit to small for my taste.
There's not really meant to be any difference there.
The use cases we (internally) wanted were
- following an individual member so you could see all their posts and articles
- following a contest so you can see the entries as they are posted
- following some forums (eg the Soapbox, suggestions and lounge) instead of the fixed set we were previously showing
- Following a specific set of tags so I could really narrow down the focus of my homepage feed
- Following a specific article so each time it was updated I'd see it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
There's not really meant to be any difference there.
I understand that, but I'd prefer if there was one.
When I get a reply in my mail for something I have written myself, there is normally no problems following the conversation.
But when it's an answer to what someone else has written I'm totally lost at what it's about, which means I'm not knowing what the importance is until I've checked the thread.
If I on the other hand can see that it obviously isn't a response directly to me, it won't trigger my "OCD".
|
|
|
|
|
I started to use that for a few articles, and I kind of like it.
I noted a small bug, though: when you follow the same article several times, you get 2 reputation points each time. I think reputation points should be awarded only once per article.
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
I think there shouldn't be any reputations points for the follower, if... and only if... just for the followed, since it triggered some interest on people.
But just klicking "follow"? I don't think is needed.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
