|
Avocado security ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah about once a year I run into a problem with uSoft and it takes an hour or more to just change a freakin password.
I do all my own stunts, but never intentionally!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like my bank. I was in Bolivia trying to buy a ticket to go home, credit card denied. Call bank international long distance.
Nice lady says my card has been frozen for suspicious activity, someone is trying to use it to purchase an airline ticket in Bolivia. My question, do you see a note indicating I'm traveling?Her: Yes. Well I'm the one using the card, because I want to go home.
Her:Sorry, sir, but it's for your protection.
Me: Actually, it's for my harrassment, because the only problem is that you froze the card for no good reason. Can you recommend a better card that won't hassle me ?
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
The real question is, what were you doing in Bolivia hey? haha got you there! 
|
|
|
|
|
He was buying Avocado's of course
|
|
|
|
|
I know what it is... in my case was the corporate card of the company, due to getting money in a ATM in Mumbay airport (business trip)...
The third time I was in India 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be a security pattern that a few software providers have followed.
Teamviewer has something similar where if the client you are trying to log into is not responding and you try logging in more than x(nobody tells you what x is) number of times you get a message telling you that there have been multiple failed logged attempts and you need to wait for a while before trying to log in again(yet again there is no hint as to how long you have to wait before trying again.)
What really rankles about Teamviewer is that even if you have the correct credentials, if the login attempt fails because of some unknown reason - that still counts towards your incorrect login attempt count.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
modified 2-Apr-19 4:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
I was logged in, the very first try to forward the message already failed, with the second account blocked... that's a bit too soon in my opinion
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
talk about taking avocado to the next secure level with --- AvocadoSecurity.com[^]
Avocado’s Hybrid Security has taken our operation to a whole new level.
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, but does it come installed on toast?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow... a site generated using Dreamweaver when it was still MacroMedia; and using Javascript version 1.2 (circa 1995)
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
No spoilers, but ... just finished Tiamat's Wrath, and now I know there will be a 9th book. Or there had better be, at least!
Only we're going to have to wait for it ... probably another couple of years ... 
Still, we have series 4 of the TV series "later this year" for those of us with Amazon Prime.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I had remembered reading before TW came out that it was the "penultimate book in the series". So, yeah. One more.
At least they're fairly fast cranking these out. Maybe a year? At least they're not on the GRRM/Rothfuss rate of writing.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
They started a year apart, but they have been 1.5 for a few books now. Hopefully they won't slow down any more ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Rothfuss
You're waiting on that one too?
Also add Jim Butcher and the next Dresden novel to that list.
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
What are you doing here?
...
...
...
Who forgot to close the fence of the insider?
run and duck
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Mwahahaha! I'm free! So Free!
Never going to get this worm back into the tube. (Or however that saying goes)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I have a number of objects in some apps with numerous variables and objects in them. When in the debugger, I'm usually only interested in a few values (bIsThisIncluded being the one I wish I could see). Unfortunately, when I mouse over to see what their values are I usually have to scroll down to see the value I want to know about. Is there any way to make them appear at the top of the list? It's not alphabetic. I've moved them around in my class declaration. I just wish I could get a few to appear at the top. Any ideas? Thanks, Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe add what you are interested in to the watch window.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but it's not straightforward and depends on what environment you're using.
Under .NET you can create something called a DebuggerTypeProxy that returns a filtered or sorted list of items
Here's a snippet of one I wrote for a project here that's still pending approval. meh
#if DEBUG
[DebuggerTypeProxy(typeof(DebugProxy))]
#endif // DEBUG
public sealed partial class Struple : DynamicObject, IDictionary<string,object>
{
#region debug proxy
#if DEBUG
sealed class DebugProxy
{
IDictionary<string,object> _outer;
internal DebugProxy(IDictionary<string,object> outer)
{
_outer = outer;
}
[DebuggerBrowsable(DebuggerBrowsableState.RootHidden)]
public KeyValuePair<string,object>[] Items {
get {
var result = new KeyValuePair<string,object>[_outer.Count];
_outer.CopyTo(result, 0);
return result;
}
}
}
#endif // DEBUG
#endregion debug proxy
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but that is just f'n scary to me. People making things way too complicated. I think. 
|
|
|
|
|
interacting with the debugger is scary
the #defines aren't necessary, just FYI
I prefer not dragging around an extra class in release builds is all
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
codewitch honey crisis wrote: interacting with the debugger is scary
Ok. I guess. I work in the debugger every day at various levels of complexity and I have never in my career needed to do extra code to get things done like that. I guess your situation calls for it. so be it. 
debugger has never been scary for me. knock on wood.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
