|
I'm well aware that the "star of David" has nothing to do with the biblical king of that name. I was trying to pun on the word "hex", but it fell flat. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
 
Quote: The word “hex” is both a noun and a verb which can either be transitive or intransitive. It can refer to the act of practicing witchcraft or the process of putting an evil spell over someone or something. It is also sometimes referred to as a jinx.
It is likewise synonymous with the words “charm” (to chant or recite a magic spell), “enchant” (to influence through incantations and charms), “bewitch” (to cast a spell over), or “strike” (to affect someone or something with a magic spell).
A hex is expected to bring bad luck to the one who is put under it. It is considered as an evil spell because it wishes bad things to happen to whom it is cast. The infliction and removal of hexes are often done by those who practice witchcraft, and they can be found in every society in most parts of the world.
The word “hex” has been used in Pennsylvania since the early 1800s where there were a number of German and Swiss immigrants. It came from the Pennsylvania Dutch/German word “hexe” which means “to practice sorcery or witchcraft.”
cheers, Bill
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: the most pluripotent magical sign is the capital letter "I,"
There's no phallic symbolism in witchcraft, oh no.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Never curse others; bad karma is only too likely to rebound on to you.
As amply demonstrated by a curse often ascribed to the Chinese, which goes: "May you live in interesting times".
The only way for the curser to avoid living in the same interesting times as the cursee is by dying.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but what special precautions do you take?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I have most of my files on an external HD.
If that one dies I'll be over in the corner crying my eyes out in fetal position 
In other words, completely unprepared 
All my code is in the cloud, so at least it'll be business as usual professionally.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: If that one dies I'll be over in the corner crying my eyes out in fetal position
|
|
|
|
|
Replace it with a three (or four) disk NAS box running RAID5 - that way a single HDD failure isn't fatal, the data can be fully recovered from the other two. (It works: I had one go down and the NAS worked flawlessly with just two while I waited for the replacement to be delivered)
If the electronics fail, you can generally read the disks in a new enclosure by the same manufacturer (but not a different one, they all use their own RAID controllers, even if the actual disks are all stored formatted as EX2).
And HDD failure is guaranteed; electronics tend to last considerably longer.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Replace it with a three (or four) disk NAS box running RAID5
That sounds difficult and expensive and I don't do hardware 
I'll probably buy a second external disk somewhere in the future and copy everything there.
Or put some stuff in the cloud.
|
|
|
|
|
It's really simple: buy the box, plug it in. Connect it to your network (instructions will be with the unit) and via your browser tell it what RAID level you want. Then just set up shares as if it was a computer.
Easy-peasy, honest.
And not that expensive: a 12TB unit complete with 4 * 3tb Disks is cheaper than a new lappie: Seagate 12TB Cloud Business Network Storage 4 Bay DLNA RAID NAS Gigabit Ethernet 7636490032042 | eBay[^] (I have the 16TB previous version of this and it's given me no problems in the three or four years I've had it)
Yes, you could buy a second external disk for a quarter of that, but ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking of moving my stuff to One Drive or some such.
Way cheaper and at least I'll still have my files when the house burns down 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I have most of my files on an external HD
I have them on multiple external HDs with multiple backup copies on yet more external HDs. I have at least three copies of everything, four copies for the really essential files, plus additional (encrypted and zipped) copies on OneDrive and Dropbox.
I just had two external 5TB hard drives, 2yr old and 3yr old, turn into doorstops and have ordered two replacements (8TB) that should arrive tomorrow. Funnily enough, I have a bunch of 2TB HDs that are a lot older (6+ years) and still running strong. You can never tell.
I haven't lost a file this millenium.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Forogar wrote: I have at least three copies of everything, four copies for the really essential files, plus additional (encrypted and zipped) copies on OneDrive and Dropbox.
Five to six copies of everything? 
1000 years from now...
News anchor: "Researchers have found what appears to be yet another copy of a folder called 'Forogar vacation pictures' containing the same pictures as in previous excavations.
Having found these same images around the world researcher now wonder, who was Forogar?"
Researcher: "We have found no records of any Forogar anywhere, yet his vacation pictures keep turning up around the world, this is the 50th finding."
News anchor: "In other news, Leslie Nielson has died..."
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Five to six copies of everything?
Yeah, I know. Only five copies of some things - but I only have so much disk space and bandwidth available. Compromises have to be made sometimes. 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you can't be paranoid enough... Or can you!?
|
|
|
|
|
I have:
- A NAS server, to which all PCs and portables in the house are backed up once a week.
- An image of the NAS server, taken monthly, stored at home. This is rotated with
- An image of the NAS server, taken monthly, stored off-site.
All my personal data are backed up to a level sufficient for my needs.
Our area is not susceptible to floods (~200 meters above sea level, ~20 kilometers inland). Should I need to replace the hardware (e.g. due to theft or a fire), I have no reason to assume that the shops will not be open. If a major earthquake or a nuclear war hits the area, I'll have bigger problems than my hardware...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a simple backup policy: I do not get attached to my data. Not one bit.
|
|
|
|
|
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Having been involved in recovery from ransomware, twice, pretty well prepared. Both cases had air-gapped backup. One server took a rebuild the other was VM that had recent backup. Both cases took scramble to get 2 days of document changes which is all that was missing and had paper backup. All that data has now been moved to cloud with backup nightly, wrote a program to download any changed Sharepoint dox as a chron job.
All stuff off the LAN at least nightly. NAS is intermediary, blocks connection via IP addresses.
Murphy is out there............ waiting.
Edit: An untested backup is similar to no backup. That is why we had to rebuild the server above, they had never tested it. That is what the VM world is all about.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
modified 5-Jul-19 8:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
theoldfool wrote: Having been involved in recovery from ransomware, twice, pretty well prepared
Got hit with wannacry?
|
|
|
|
|
not me, clients did the crying. I did ka-ching!
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
There's ultimately 2 machines I need to backup:
a) A machine that ultimately just acts as a NAS. It primarily contains personal files and archived installers, from OS ISOs to full app setups (none of those crappy web installers that spend hours downloading). That gets backed up to two drives: One sitting next to the computer (physically disconnected unless currently synchronizing), the other is sitting at the office and replaced with the one from home once a month.
b) A VM host. The host OS basically contains nothing but the motherboard drivers and Hyper-V, so I don't bother backing that up. The VMs are backed up on another pair of drives, in the same way as described above. The hardware can die - in fact the motherboard was replaced a few years ago - and all I had to do was create new VMs and point them to the existing VHD files on disk. That also takes care of duplicating a working environment elsewhere if I needed to.
My backups are done with robocopy.exe and a batch file (ok, a PowerShell script). I have little trust in third-party software that create files that can't be read without the software that originally wrote them; additionally, the way I see it, incremental backups are at risk if one file in the set gets corrupt. With robocopy, I can browse the file system without relying on any particular software and grab a single file, a folder, or an entire disk. The whole lot gets encrypted with TrueCrypt using whole-disk encryption.
The one thing I don't get is a file change history, but in the unlikely event I ever need to go back to an old version of a file, I have yet another old system that only gets powered on and resynchronized maybe once a year.
|
|
|
|
|
Perfect!
|
|
|
|
|
After 3+ decades using computers, that's my preferred approach. Ultimately it's not cheap, but then, you pay what you're willing to in order to be able to recover your data.
|
|
|
|
|
For personal stuff, I have no backup/recovery plan. When I get a new system every 5-6 years, the personal stuff gets copied to an external drive for transfer so a worst case scenario of an unrecoverable drive failure after the first year would be irritating but not devastating.
Perhaps this is being naïve, but I have a lot more faith in the hardware these days, specifically SSDs. The only spinners still in use here are external USB drives. I just recently replaced the first 64GB SSD I bought for a server back in 2011...not because it failed.
Professionally, I have a pretty simple backup system using a server and a laptop. All important work related files are kept in shared folders on the server. These shares are mapped on the laptop with the 'available offline' option. At least once a week, the laptop synchs up any changes. If I need to use the laptop away from the office, all my files/projects are there and will update the server on the next synch.
This method absolutely saved my bacon about 3 years ago when the server's data drive failed. Even though I was able to recover all my development files, docs, etc. I soon realized that most of the sql databases being hosted on that server were lost...the log files and backups were on the failed data drive. In all, I lost a few months of customer support tickets which had to be re-entered. 
That experience led me to create a nice little sql backup utility that runs a nightly or weekly backup storing/rotating copies on two different local drives as well as sending a copy to a remote ftp location. I won't be fooled again! It also has the benefit that if I'm working remotely, I or my colleague can get last night's backup from anywhere. Disasters should always be a learning experience...best when learned from others!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
