|
raddevus wrote: becoming impossible to point to source code where the decision came from.
Using your bank analogy, can you imagine a financial application that could not track down when and how money moved?  
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems the real question that should be asked is not if "code is the law" and buggy and all that.
The code needs to be interpreted and the interpreter can be not only buggy, itself, but even deliberately designed to be corrupt.
Thus, those making this 'contract' are having involvement (with neither their knowledge nor consent) by a third party.
The entire concept falls apart.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the beauty of the system is that there is no central authority.
However, that is also the problem that could destroy the system also.
It seems as if the people who are for blockchain smart contracts are saying, "oh, it'll all work out, just fine". 
|
|
|
|
|
"...just tell the customer, 'well the computer decided and we know computers do things correctly'. "
This is exactly what they do today! If it came out of a computer or cash register display the teller/cashier/branchmanager is dumbfounded that anyone would question it! Thinking is so old-school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BabyYoda wrote: can you imagine a financial application that could not track down when and how money moved?
I thought we already had it... see 2008.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That was due to deregulation of the financial industry. Yes, let business regulate itself. What matters more, safe food supplies or cheaper prices? So much for the environment and human well being.
|
|
|
|
|
"Nits" Re. the books example, the computer did do exactly what it was told to do, ( probably ), just not anything expected.
( It was programmed to ( probably a not quite correct description ) follow a set of rules with weighted random selection and some added randomness, and tweek weights depending on the results. So the unexpected IS expected. )
BUT, computers don't only do what they are told, hardware failure that doesn't result in fatal errors is rare, but can happen.
|
|
|
|
|
Just another example of how an AI decision can be reached without our ability to understand why:
There is a RadioLab episode where they talk about an AI that was able to sort out the relationship between several chemicals in a human body. Empirical testing after the fact confirmed the relationship. However, there isn't a single scientist that knows why the relationship exists.
Bond
Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
That it what they said about #5!
|
|
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly when I read the comment!
|
|
|
|
|
theDrd2k1 wrote: That it what they said about #5!
What is #5?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKJCP wrote: Same is true for guns
And everything else inanimate.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. I am hoping computers stay inanimate.
|
|
|
|
|
computers make very precise errors, very fast.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To err is human but to really foul up requires a computer.
|
|
|
|
|
The mentally ill cannot enter into "contracts", even if they do.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Report: Blockchain-related hacks have declined in 2020[^]
Yes, Blockchain hacks have declined, meaning they exist.
I remember reading about hacked Bitcoin wallets so not even Blockchain is 100%, despite what they say.
The decline may be attributed to the fact Blockchain isn't as hot and happening as in 2019.
In fact, this post of yours may be the first I see of it in 2020 
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: The rules are written in code and checked by trustless participants of the network to prevent corruption or collusion.
"Trustless" Yes, I know what it means. Still, it'll look scary to ordinary people.. 
|
|
|
|
|
GenJerDan wrote: Still, it'll look scary to ordinary people.
I think so too. It seems like an odd term to try to convince people that it is safe.
|
|
|
|
|
It is scary to an extent. In fairness, human contracts and laws can be ambiguous and have loop holes too. Many people sign contracts without actually reading them. Some of them get burned badly because of that. I think smart contracts have their place, but the technology is just a little too new yet.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: So smart contracts are going to enforce rules for transactions which become "law" (the system will not break the "law" (code), no matter how fouled up the "law" may be").
Do these Blockchain enthusiasts not understand how buggy software is? 
What could possibly go wrong? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
'$300m in cryptocurrency' accidentally lost forever due to bug
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
