|
Because your gain will be the highest?   
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
 I'd have to accomplish something first
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Coming next - SnarkGPT? 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
So, chatgpt empowers lower performing agents to be professional bull*itter instead of letting them ask someone more knowledgeable.
I expect Microsoft's version is hardwired to suggest re-installing Windows when the German language spellchecker is not working in Word - ooops, that already happened years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Tech giant makes concession in an attempt to avoid formal EU antitrust investigation and follows complaint by rival Slack There's no Teams in I
Or something like that
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, we have Office 365 at work and I find some things useful, but I am not really comfortable with all the background things going (statistics, integration, things getting sent from A to B without user prompt...)
I am just wondering when the BIG privacy check / leak will come...
A bit offtopic: In Germany TEAM might mean "Toll ein anderen macht's" (Nice, someone else will do it)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
German acronyms are savage.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
These people said that, in future, when companies buy Office they can do it with or without Teams if they wished, but the mechanism on how to do this remains unclear.
When contacting enterprise sales they can negotiate towards a price of $X/Employee for Office with Teams or $Y/employee for Office without Teams. $Y > $X.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
Article is behind a paywall
|
|
|
|
|
Dang, it wasn't when I looked. Alas, try this one[^]. I'll update the link to go to it as well.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
We're headed toward something we can't clearly see—and we'll never get there. "Come a little bit closer, I'm all alone and the night is so long"
|
|
|
|
|
Pulling in?
I thought we were actually expanding "out"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Space is expanding. That does not prevent object from moving in space. Now you know as much about this as the greatest cosmologist. /s
Cosmology is the ultimate descriptive science. It's not like we've got another Universe on which we can test our theories...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Cosmology is the ultimate descriptive science. It's not like we've got another Universe on which we can test our theories...
Really? And what about the parallel universes (of Marvel)?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
OpenAI's conversational AI bot ChatGPT has quickly become a viral sensation with its ability to write stories, compose emails, and generate code. However, a new report now suggests that it costs OpenAI an ungodly amount just to keep it running daily. So about $50 per bad line of code?
|
|
|
|
|
So... if it costs $700k/day to operate... how much are they earning with its operating?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
They earned $10bn from MS recently.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
i think the need to fix their operating cost or they become a sink hole for the billions microsoft is pumping in ..just to generate some text in a browser for the masses..
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
No wonder it's so hyped. They need really aggressive marketing to return their money
|
|
|
|
|
Let's get a sense of proportion here. We are talking about $250 million dollars a year, which for companies the size of Microsoft isn't even a big line item. The $10 billion that they just received from Microsoft could keep ChatGPT running for 40 years.
I'd call that a well-funded project, wouldn't you?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
When I think back on the software engineers I looked up to, they all shared this trait where they never took anything at face value. Or just being critical?
It seems to work for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Or just being critical cynical?
It seems to work for me.
FTFY... and yes, it works really good. Without you the insider would not be the same
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason the term that is coming to mind today is 'clinically insane.'
|
|
|
|
|
IT workers say they’re uncomfortable deploying productivity monitoring software and would think twice about working for a company that snoops on its employees. Apparently the watchmen don't really like watching
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: and would think twice about working for a company that snoops on its employees.
Twice?
I don't need to think twice. If it happens to me I start looking for something new in the moment I know about it and if it is in an interview, I just stand up, say thank you (but think screw you) and walk away.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
