|
jschell wrote: So the CPU was getting so hot that it was warming up the room (not just computer) that you were in to such an extent that you turned it off to get cooler?
Have you never been working in an environment with, say, 40 servers gathered in a server room?
A few years ago, we were moving to another wing of the building. The move was delayed by a couple of months because the machine room needed so much AC that there wasn't enough electric power for it without a significant rewiring, with more circuits of higher rating.
A home environment is different, of course. But look at these gaming machines: They have power supplies of 1200 W, 1500 W, ... The three huge screens come on top of that. And the 6 channel times 50 W sound system. It all ends up as heat, similar to a 2000-2500 W electric heater. If you don't need it to keep your house warm (and it certainly is not a very efficient way to heat your house!), you need an AC which can dispose of 2000-2500 W of heat - and the AC unit will give you another 500 W or so of heat (assuming a COP of 4 to 5; they don't go very much higher).
If you live in a house built by current insulation standards (as far as I have read, Canada and Norway standards are comparable), then an extra 3000 W of heat may be sufficient to keep your entire house warm even in mid-winter.
|
|
|
|
|
The post said "primary" so I presumed one.
trønderen wrote: They have power supplies of 1200 W, 1500 W,
Not really my thing these days but I believe that if you drive the power supply to the maximum on the computer and the other devices you are going to end up having hardware issues quite quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: So the CPU was getting so hot that it was warming up the room (not just computer) that you were in to such an extent that you turned it off to get cooler?
Sounds more like a fireplace or an oven than the computer.
You sound surprised. Heat management is absolutely a consideration for any IT manager who's responsible for putting together a number of PCs in a room. It'll get hot - very hot. Data centers spend a fortune on AC. But this one PC was a special case.
As mentioned, that particular generation of AMD CPUs (Athlons? It was over 10 years ago) was known to be generating a lot of heat; it's not like the thermal paste needed to be replaced or the heat sink reseated as is often the solution nowadays. It just generated that much heat, by design, so even with proper cooling/ventilation, the heat had to go somewhere. So, it heated the room.
Nowadays, it seems like high-end GPUs have taken that role...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting article.
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
I first heard this quote from my Grad School prof at about the same time frame.
We were experimenting with different memory access schemes for RISC processors the hottest CPU design at the time (bit slicing, segmentation, etc. ). Fun times.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
I think he's denied it, but I'm going to keep repeating it anyway. The sentiment still has value, wherever it originated.
|
|
|
|
|
I am repeating it too - as a great example of taking quotes out of context.
In another interview (for which I don't have any URL), Gates did not remember having said it, but remarked that if he had said anything like that, it would have to be in discussions about the sharing of the 1024 Ki available RAM between the OS and user processes. Reserving 384 Ki for the OS, leaving 640 Ki for user processes, that should be enough for any user process running in 1024 Ki RAM.
Whether Gates actually said it or not: I support it! I would never argue that, given 1024 Ki, the OS, drivers, I/O buffers and other system software should be given any less than 384 Ki. You may ridicule me for that statement just as much as you ridicule Gates. Go ahead! Then, please include some viable arguments why the OS should have less than 384 Ki, and tell us how much less, given the 1024 Ki total.
I am really happy that Gates made or didn't make this statement. I have no better example to illustrate quotes taken out of context.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point. The quote about "no one needs a computer in their home" is another example of a quote taken out of context.
But it can also be an example of someone (anyone) not foreseeing the future very well, such as the oft repeated "I see a world market for maybe five computers".
Olsen is quoted as saying "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home."
Thomas J Watson, reputedly said: "I think there is a world market for about five computers."
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Thomas J Watson, reputedly said: "I think there is a world market for about five computers."
If you today stated that "I think that there is a world market for about five cloud service providers", maybe you will be ridiculed for it, 30 years from now.
Thomas J Watson viewed those five computers remarkable similar to how we view the five biggest (are there really that many?) cloud service providers.
You could make similar statements e.g. about how many search engines the world needs. And different OSes. And different Linux distros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for everything! ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Thanks for everything!
Indeed!
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
I remember when I babysate (?) Bob.
sooooo cute in his Pamper garbage collector.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
Is Bob getting a little gray around the edges? 
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
Is Bob old enough to
drive?
vote?
drink?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder's profile says he's been a member for 23 years, 4 months, so the answer to all questions is yes, assuming that Bob lives in a place that has cars, elections, and alcohol. 
|
|
|
|
|
Mine is 23Y 4M as well where has the time gone?
|
|
|
|
|
I was so young and stupid when I first found CP. Now I'm only stupid. 
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Birthday!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Birthday Bob
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
happy birthday. go figure!
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Love you guys!!! You're newsletter commentary is the best on the internet!! 🤘⚡️🌪
|
|
|
|
|
I just installed the latest Windows 11 updates and the task bar finally has the option to never combine buttons and hide labels again!
Been using ExplorerPatcher for a year now to fix what had been working for nearly thirty years.
Unfortunately, ExplorerPatcher occassionally messed up some other things, like the volume bar.
I hope they also sacked the person who decided to remove that feature in the first place, dishonorable discharge!
I really don't get how people can work with buttons combined and labels missing.
You always need at least one extra step (hovering over the combined button) and it removes your overview when having multiple windows of the same application open, which is almost always (especially Visual Studio).
A good day indeed!
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I really don't get how people can work with buttons combined
Frankly speaking, quite easily. I would hate to have thousands buttons open in my taskbar, I prefer them grouped for each application - and hovering allows you to see exactly which one you want to use (as opposed to have all buttons starting with "MS-Excel - bla" and having to look for the correct one.)
Sander Rossel wrote: (hovering over the combined button)
is not extra step, to click on a button you need to hover it.
Sander Rossel wrote: it removes your overview when having multiple windows of the same application open
Just hover, and there they are displayed in a line.
I think it is all a matter of taste
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
