|
Ahhh, the memory washes -
On Error GoTo
What a wonderful thing it used to be to hide your incompetent code and errors back then lol. 
I remember there were almost more 'GoTo's' than If Elses's.
|
|
|
|
|
Article is an absolute waste of time and bandwidth. Nothing more than a rant about literally nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
All that blather actually ends with a good observation and some self-awareness:
Quote: I once read a blog post about why stack traces should really have the for loop indices in them too; you will learn why that’s an interesting idea that may be something the entire programming community has overlooked for decades. Then at least this won’t be a pointless whiny blog post for you.
Indeed. And not only loop indices, but every local. The problem is knowing where they currently are in the face of how compilers assign and reassign registers.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: ends with a good observation
I thought the observation was:
Article wrote: a pointless whiny blog post for you.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That was the self-awareness part.
|
|
|
|
|
As hard to believe as it may be for some of you folks who recently got into Windows, there was a time when the Redmond giant had decided that it was going to stick to Windows 10 forever. It was, for some
Imagine that: reorganizations causing product changes
|
|
|
|
|
I really have to start my upgrade to Vista from XP, I am really falling behind now, I mean Win 10 already, noooo. 
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Oosthuizen wrote: upgrade to Vista from XP
I would suggest that you upgrade from XP to 2000. Windows 2000 was a much better O/S than Vista!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I could not find a ripped copy yet, maybe it was so good. Visited my local PC shop, they have no copies, all about Googling and download stuff, no idea what they were rambling on about!
Oh damn, just realized I have no internal DVD player to install, have to use an external player, I wonder if my USB 1.0 will be large enough to copy files...
|
|
|
|
|
GitHub promises that this new system can remediate more than two-thirds of the vulnerabilities it finds — often without the developers having to edit any code themselves. Fix as in plumber, or fix as in veterinarian?
|
|
|
|
|
Not much to edit in the first two thirds as it was generated by itself as an Ai as master code, not much to edit in the latter 3rd as Dev's do not mess with their own master codes, it is always correct right...
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction - Rust for C#/.NET Developers[^]:
This is a (non-comprehensive) guide for C# and .NET developers that are completely new to the Rust programming language. Some concepts and constructs translate fairly well between C#/.NET and Rust, but which may be expressed differently, whereas others are a radical departure, like memory management. This guide provides a brief comparison and mapping of those constructs and concepts with concise examples. Now you have no excuse not to learn Rust!
|
|
|
|
|
I've been meaning to bite the bullet. Maybe this will be the final push.
|
|
|
|
|
Nooo, don't tell me you became rusty at this!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks ... The idea of both languages side-by-side makes it very interesting for learning  , and Rust Playground makes it even more interesting
modified 20-Mar-24 10:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
peterkmx wrote: and Rust Playground makes it even more interesting
Rust Explorer is better. Richer intellisesnse and inline compiler errors. It also keeps a history even if not logged in. Though not always operational. Not working right now. Code runs but no intellisense. 
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, good to know ... I'll keep it on the agenda 
Lately I also installed RustRover, I will try it too,
it will be a kind of multi-track learning  ...
modified 21-Mar-24 18:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Rust for professionals is also worth a look just to get a quick overview of he syntax.
Quote: This is a short introduction to Rust, intended for developers that already know another language. In the examples, Rust is compared with TypeScript, JavaScript or Java, sometimes with C++ or Kotlin.
And also bookmark GitHub - jondot/rust-how-do-i-start: Hand curated advice and pointers for getting started with Rust
What I found initially was that when I first read the initial concepts around ownership and borrowing they seemed straightforward enough. But it's when you start writing real code that things get scary quite quickly. 
I remember being stuck for three days at one point when trying to convert a C# program to Rust. I never did solve the problem. Instead I took a different approach.
I'd also say don't sweat over trying to write idiomatic Rust at the first attempt. Just get something working. So in my case when porting an application I just wanted to get the correct results. Having achieved that I then successively "Rustified" it as I started to learn more.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks, my backlog for multi-track learning becomes still more interesting,
Wish you a good weekend ... 
|
|
|
|
|
It's fun though, even when you get stuck. Also the Chat AIs are pretty good. Though these came out well after I'd started learning. It's best to avoid them until you've reached a certain level on your own first. Then you can gain more from them.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Shao Voon Wong wrote: Now you have no excuse not to learn Rust!
But, Zig[^]!
I think that may be a pretty good excuse. 
Sorry, just trying to muddy the waters. 
|
|
|
|
|
But a long way from 1.0. Having said that, a while back I saw a post from someone who's used both and he feels there could be room for both.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
And so the wheel turns...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
