C# WPF, Threading........

Question

1.00/5 (1 vote)

See more:

C#

WPF

can i get a tutorial in threading and how to do it?

Posted 22-May-11 21:28pm

C.CoderCreator

Add a Solution

Comments

Sandeep Mewara 23-May-11 13:28pm

Google?

2 solutions

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Tarun.K.S · Answer 1 · 2011-05-22T21:35:00

Solution 2

Well yes, you can start with using a BackgroundWorker, its easy and safe to implement. Other advantage is its support for displaying the progress.

Here is one simple tutorial : http://www.dreamincode.net/forums/topic/112547-using-the-backgroundworker-in-c%23/[^]

Also check out my blog post here : http://tarundotnet.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/using-backgroundworker-in-wpf-applications/[^]

Also check out this Threading Model[^]of WPF.

Good luck. :thumbsup:

Posted 22-May-11 21:35pm

Tarun.K.S

Updated 22-May-11 21:39pm

v2

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 23-May-11 3:59am

Reasonable set of sources, my 5. Only I would not recommend to focus on BackgroundWorker -- it's more of the simplification. And displaying techniques is not specific for this class.
--SA

Tarun.K.S 23-May-11 13:07pm

Thanks SA. It was easy to implement but yes its less flexible.

[no name] 23-May-11 5:36am

it all looks so complicated

Tarun.K.S 23-May-11 13:08pm

BackgroundWorker is easy to implement, if this is complicated for you then the other way of threading is even more complicated. Anyway good luck.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 23-May-11 19:33pm

In our culture people say: "To be afraid of wolves means not going the the forest!".
Wining does not help. Don't even play with the idea of working without threads -- it will lead nowhere.
--SA

ambarishtv · Answer 2 · 2011-05-22T21:31:00

Solution 1

Try this link[^]

Posted 22-May-11 21:31pm

ambarishtv