object oriented programming

Question

1.00/5 (2 votes)

See more:

what is the deference between object oriented programming and purely object oriented programming ???
If visual basic is an object oriented programming language then why is vb.net an purely object oriented programming language ??

Posted 30-Sep-11 9:00am

Upasi

Add a Solution

Comments

Mehdi Gholam 30-Sep-11 15:01pm

Your question makes no sense.

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

dasblinkenlight · Answer 1 · 2011-09-30T09:34:00

In "pure OO languages" built-in and user types must be objects, and all operations must be messages to objects[^]. In VB.NET there are built-in types that require "boxing" to become objects, and there are operations that are not messages to objects. That's why neither VB.NET nor C# are "pure OO" languages.