|
Christian Graus wrote:
You and all the others can go to hell, collectively
Get lost!
At least I thought you could take what I wrote. But excuse me Sir for not agree with the way you always try to get people to use what *you* think is the best.
- Anders
Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
http://SourceLocker.net[^] SourceControl and DefectTracker Project.
nsms@spyf.dk <- Spam Collecting 
|
|
|
|
|
Anders Molin wrote:
At least I thought you could take what I wrote.
That's the pot calling the kettle black, doncha think ? I at least explained myself, you're just abusing me for having an opinion and being willing to share it.
Anders Molin wrote:
But excuse me Sir for not agree with the way you always try to get people to use what *you* think is the best.
I'll assume that as English is not your first language, you were incapable of understanding my last post. Get an English speaker to explain it to you.
Christian
I have drunk the cool-aid and found it wan and bitter. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, mud throwing, eh?
You really dont get what I say dont you?
Christian Graus wrote:
I'll assume that as English is not your first language, you were incapable of understanding my last post. Get an English speaker to explain it to you.
I did understand your post, but it looks like that even you have english as your first language, you are totally incapable of understanding what I write. 
I really dont wanna waste more time being offended by you.
- Anders
Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
http://SourceLocker.net[^] SourceControl and DefectTracker Project.
nsms@spyf.dk <- Spam Collecting
|
|
|
|
|
Anders Molin wrote:
I did understand your post, but it looks like that even you have english as your first language, you are totally incapable of understanding what I write.
Let's see, shall we ?
I suggested that if there is a dependency to MSVCRT, it's *possible* that he could be using some old C functionality that C++ does better.
You wrote:
And one thing that really sucks, is seeing the "I know better types" saying such crap all the times.
I again clarified that I didn't claim that the C library was useless, but that a lot of people don't even know the C++ stuff is there, so I suggested it was worth a look.
You wrote:
But excuse me Sir for not agree with the way you always try to get people to use what *you* think is the best.
Conclusion: you are an arrogant clown, possibly illiterate.
Anders Molin wrote:
I really dont wanna waste more time being offended by you.
Then don't make an ass of yourself. I maintain that if people ask questions, they are looking for answers, and that my answer was both correct, and not what you claimed it to be. Using really small words, it goes like this. C++ has stuff that is better than C, and a good coder knows about both so he can make the right choice. Too many don't know and so make the wrong choice, because universities don't *teach* C++, they teach C with classes.
Christian
I have drunk the cool-aid and found it wan and bitter. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote:
Conclusion: you are an arrogant clown, possibly illiterate.
Hehehe, maybe that makes 2 of us, but you are really good at offending other people, I'll give you that.
Christian Graus wrote:
and a good coder knows about both so he can make the right choice.
Of course, but why do you bring it up every time you answer a post where people mention crt?
Thats what keeps bugging me, i know you give some great answers, but why also try to "convert" people to use C++ just because they mentioned a crt function.
- Anders
Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
http://SourceLocker.net[^] SourceControl and DefectTracker Project.
nsms@spyf.dk <- Spam Collecting
|
|
|
|
|
Anders Molin wrote:
you are really good at offending other people, I'll give you that.
LOL - it works in real life, too..... 
Anders Molin wrote:
Of course, but why do you bring it up every time you answer a post where people mention crt?
I guess I am just accustomed to people using the CRT because they don't know there are alternatives. I probably have STL blinkers on, I'll admit that. But the majority of times I get to discuss it with people, I do find that they really don't realise it's not the only alternative.
Christian
I have drunk the cool-aid and found it wan and bitter. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have to say that I dont like STL much, that probably make me a bit quick too.
I have made a lot of server applications that did big amounts of string handling. I tried to convert some of the code from TCHAR* tp std::string, but the performance was too bad.
Ok, STL is good for many things, but not everything
- Anders
Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
http://SourceLocker.net[^] SourceControl and DefectTracker Project.
nsms@spyf.dk <- Spam Collecting
|
|
|
|
|
Taking a clue from a recent soapbox rant, I think the simplest thing to do is tell everyone that "STL will fix your problem".
Marc
STL, a liability factory - Anonymously
A doable project is one that is small enough to be done quickly and big enough to be interesting - Ken Orr
Latest AAL Article
My blog
|
|
|
|
|
If you have VC++ SP5, there is a file called Vcredist.exe which contains all the files you need.
|
|
|
|
|
So, what about static linking? Saves you all that grief.
Marc
STL, a liability factory - Anonymously
A doable project is one that is small enough to be done quickly and big enough to be interesting - Ken Orr
Latest AAL Article
My blog
|
|
|
|
|
Really simple question here, I guess... what's the difference between the following:
#include <iostream>
and
#include <iostream.h>
??
I know that they are two different files in the Visual C++ include folder, but what is the difference from a programming point of view? This is also the same case for some other header files, such as <string> and <string.h>... So which method is more efficient?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Including <iostream.h> uses the obsolete iostream library. Including <iostream> uses STL. You should always use the STL version since that's the current official library.
--Mike--
Ericahist | Homepage | RightClick-Encrypt | 1ClickPicGrabber
Latest art~!@#2rDFA#@(#*%$Rfa39f3fqwf--=
NO CARRIER
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All,
I am new to Visual C++. I need to know what is the easiest method of DIGITAL WATERMARKING using Visual C++. Is it the "LSB WATERMARKING" method? I am doing this as part of my school project. The picture format i am doing is BITMAP.
I hope someone can help and guide me (algorithm, methods, programming, etc) to do this.. or provide me with any reference (website, files, examples).
Thanks a lot..
Thong
twh81@tm.net.my
...
|
|
|
|
|
I've had a hard time figuring out the handle to the window that places the low diskpace notification icons on the tray. The goal is to remove the icon. Anyone with an idea?
|
|
|
|
|
Visual C++ 6.0 ----- WindowsXPpro ----- Access2000
I created a database by Access2000 ...... "QLBH.mdb"
CMy3View is CRecordView based class
I put MS ADO Data Control v6.0 and MS DataGrid v6.0 on my form (IDD_DB_FORM)
in design-time , I connect ADO control with "QLBH.mdb" and
MS DataGrid bound to ADO control
In Tab "Connection" when I push "TestConnection" button >>
it show "Test Connection Succeeded" Msgbox
My connection string look like this:
DBQ=F:\Project\QLBH.mdb;DefaultDir=F:\Project;Driver={Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)};DriverId=25;FIL=MS Access;FILEDSN=D:\Program Files\Common Files\ODBC\Data Sources\11111.dsn;MaxBufferSize=2048;MaxScanRows=8;PageTimeout=5;SafeTransactions=0;Threads=3;UID=admin;UserCommitSync=Yes;
but in rum-time ADO control is disabled => no record in MS DataGrid.
>> I want MS DataGrid show all my records....then users can edit,add,delete ...
like Access
and the last question: can I connect to my database in runtime
...such as when I user push a other button... ADO control is
connected to "c:\QLBH2.mdb"
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I want a modal dialog to perform some tasks after it is shown on the screen. Is there a way to achieve this?
Can you please tell me how?
Thnxx
|
|
|
|
|
you could use a one-time initialisation on ON_WM_SETFOCUS( ) event!
Don't try it, just do it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Set a timer for 100 msec.
HPS HwndSpy - GUI developer's aid to visually
locate and inspect windows. For the month of August
only, use coupon code CP-81239 for 30% off.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to restart my MFC dialog application at run time - i.e. to close the dialog box and create it immediately after that. Any suggestions how to this? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
You can call CreateProcess in your CMyApp::ExitInstance
But why do you want this?
Arjan.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, how I can response the system message, when my program is in a loop?
(for instance in a 'for' loop). I want to not use Timer & Thread programing.
DoEvent is a function of Visual Basic.
Thank;)
|
|
|
|
|
when you get a system message, you'll get it as WM_SYSCOMMMAND message on your window!
for a window, you normally have a main loop, which calls GetMessage, TranslateMessage and DispatchMessage!
this loop calls you window procedure!
that means, when you're out of your for loop, the window's message queue will be processed, also the syscommand!
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDI+ initialization wrecks up DDE file opening in my MDI application (i.e. when you click on the document file in the Explorer). When I call GdiPlusStartup(...) before CMDIFrameWnd::LoadFrame in CMyApp::InitInstance, it says "Windows cannot find the file: ..." at first, the application shows no window, but it stays running and loads document properly at second attempt. When I initialize GDI+ after CMDIFrameWnd::LoadFrame, the document loads properly but the whole frame goes background.
It seems that nasty GDI+ hidden window demolishes DDE window order or something alike. I tried it on the pure AppWizard-generated MDI sample and it's exactly the same phenomenon. I may send the sample if you have any ideas.
Regards,
BB
|
|
|
|
|
i have created a custom tree control and created a group box to contain its location within in my dialog
here is the code
GetDlgItem(IDC_ZONETREE_FRAME)->GetWindowRect(frameRect);
zone_tree.Create(WS_VISIBLE|TVS_HASLINES|TVS_LINESATROOT|TVS_SHOWSELALWAYS|TVS_HASBUTTONS , frameRect, this, IDC_ZONETREE);
however when i run the program the tree control is like an inch below the group box is there something wrong with my code or whats the deal here ?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
