|
spam[^] mer[^]
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
// No comment
modified 18-Mar-15 5:27am.
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Spam and member Gone
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message deleted. Member on 7 atm.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I located it on C# Corner, but he wrote it there as well (same author name). I could not find it anywhere else.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
There's a copy of both on his own blog. I won't link to it, because it has a very spammy-looking post from December.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which part of this name (there are two IDs, the title name and the "@wannabeyourm" which is not a display name, but is still visible on the profile page), which part do you consider offensive?
Maybe it's better not to set a negative model of finding everything around offensive? There are well too many members already who tend to play offense card?
Sorry if I missed your point; in that case, please explain.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Look down his list of Comments. He's changed his name a few times. At one point, it was "Your Bitch".
|
|
|
|
|
Ha-ha, yes I saw it earlier today. Then I guess this person tried to rather offend her/himself. Other things are worse.
I just noted for myself that referring this person could be a bit awkward: Your bitch wrote… I mean, not yours… the inquirer wrote…
Today the forums are rich in real freaks (as if spamming and plagiarizing wasn't enough). I recently reported one and a bit earlier OriginalGriff reported another one…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: Today the forums are rich in real freaks
That's one way to describe them. They're certainly not developers.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point. The issue is: do we need non-engineers, non-developers here? I thin we don't. The only problem is: who can decide on that? I guess, people can be kicked off only if it becomes quite obvious, in each separate case.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the most of them don't realize that they are just hobbyists, but since they're getting a paycheck to do it they think they're doing it "for real".
|
|
|
|