|
Spammer: Digital Support - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Member questions & answers[^]
Joined today, first post: "Please Read This Artical It will Be help full [link to site with same name as user]"
Even worse: looking at the spam URL, it doesn't even relate to the question it's supposed to be answering!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final kick delivered to all.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure we've had this discussion before.
In this case, I'm looking at you, @fes-sitecore:
How To Change the font Style of ListBox Items?[^]
- Question from 2012;
- New solution posted yesterday at 16:44 by already-dead spammer - content: "answer here", linking to a shortened spam URL;
- Solution edited yesterday at 16:51 by F-ES Sitecore - content changed to: "
[removed spammer link]";
Unless there is some potentially useful non-spam content in the answer, there's no point editing it. Just report it.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely.
If you edit and remove the spam, then when the message gets dumped due to spam reports, it gets passed to the heuristic spam detector which uses the final content as "this contains spam" data - and you get more false positives and more missed spam as a result.
We're generally pretty quick: it doesn't last long before we squash it.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined today, first post, hidden link spam: Member 13872974 - Professional Profile[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 15-Jun-18 3:56am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Thanks
Happy Coding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
,
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis Rutland - Professional Profile[^]
Who has three articles, all the same year, all on the same piece of hardware - a lappie - and two of them stating:
Quote: I received one or more of the products or services mentioned above for free in the hope that I would mention it on my blog. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe my readers will enjoy. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR, Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising." ASUS Zenbook UX31E-DH52 – First Impressions Review[^]
ASUS Zenbook UX31E-DH52[^]
ASUS Zenbook UX31E-DH52 -- A Developer's Perspective[^]
Me? I smell pink meat here - one article when you got the lappie for free is ... ok (jammy git) ... but three? Smelly.
Your thoughts?
Or do we need to disturb @Sean-Ewington for a decision?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Let alone the uselessness of this kind of article, it is clear that what motivated these submissions was an advertising process going on.
I reported them.
667: The neighbour of the Beast
|
|
|
|