|
Gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam mer[^]
while (true) {
continue;
}
modified 18-Aug-15 7:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message has gone, so link now just goes to Lounge itself.
Spammer currently on 9
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This answer[^] from this user[^] (Solution 2) is clearly abusive: once you translate it to english, that gives something like:
biến mẹ mày đi thằng chó đẻ -> turn your mother go straight bitch
đụ con đỉ mẹ mày -> though they are your mother
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Highly abusive. Answer removed.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
They also had one that got through - I've deleted it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Look at this example http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ListVersions.aspx?aid=1017398[^]
Between revisions 12 to 31 there are no changes in the article at all. So I believe the purpose is solely to keep the article on the front page.
That together with the begging for votes in the comments section is giving a bit of a bad taste.
Oh, please don't simply report, I want a discussion on where it goes from silly behaviour to actual abuse.
|
|
|
|
|
The vote requests aren't to my taste - but I find it tacky in QA as well - but that's not abuse.
The edits are edging there, but I don't think that counts as actual abuse either, it's just "gaming the system" without any real reward.
Perhaps a quiet word is the best policy? It's not a bad article, after all!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Perhaps a quiet word is the best policy
Probably, but that's rather a task for @sean-ewington or @chris-maunder than me.
OriginalGriff wrote: It's not a bad article, after all
That's why I asked people to not simply report.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the tags on the article is "CEO". That explains a few things.
|
|
|
|