|
I belief most of these studies are about behaviors of single or few particles, namely they are at underlying microscopic level. Thermodynamics (specifically, the 2nd Law) will still emerge at macroscopic level. This is true at least in the theory I developed, which IS about Statistical Physics for relativistic quantum fields ...
|
|
|
|
|
You know magic mushrooms are found in bull sh*t, seems it's getting pretty deep.
|
|
|
|
|
JA Wheeler and RP Feynman wrote an article in 1945 analyzing why we do not detect electromagnetic waves propagating into the past. Their conclusion was that the early Universe was opaque, and the waves coming from the future generated a response that exactly cancelled them out.
[Wheeler JA, Feynman RP. Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation Reviews of Modern Physics. 17: 157-181. DOI: 10.1103/Revmodphys.17.157]
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Most of these ideas are already formally implemented in modern relativistic quantum field theories. But these are not enough to eliminate the inconsistencies found in finite density/temperature situations, especially for fermions, new infinities occur that is either not noticed or was simply dropped, which is a habit of the modern days, ...
It depends on an understanding of time reversal and its symmetry in quantum mechanics. My contribution is a realization, in my Ph.D study and thesis, of the necessity of a distinction between the so called motion reversal and causal reversal for quantum particles ...
These understanding was formally implemented in my theory that consistently eliminates the said infinities ... I know it's too technical to be discussed here, but ...
|
|
|
|
|
The primary causes cited for this exhaustion are excessive workloads (47%), inefficiencies in processes (31%), and ambiguity in objectives and targets (29%). The other 17% were to busy to fill out the survey
|
|
|
|
|
GPT-4 has only been around for a day, but users are already learning the power of the new AI tool. How long for DOOM?
|
|
|
|
|
Just don't challenge it to recreate Missile Command.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dave, shall we play a game?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
"ARC's evaluation has much lower probability of leading to an AI takeover than the deployment itself." Before or after they launched it?
|
|
|
|
|
Did they asked politelly?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The support for async/await has been around now for over a decade. In that time, it’s transformed how scalable code is written for .NET, and it’s both viable and extremely common to utilize the functionality without understanding exactly what’s going on under the covers. I'll tell you later
Edit: fixed the r in the title
modified 16-Mar-23 15:39pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: This is a real possibility that’s easy to repro. Seriously, he couldn't type four more letters for a proper sentence?
|
|
|
|
|
Not everybody is native US-English
Explain you in French, I will take the challenge 
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Not everybody is native US-English
let's analyze this.
"native" language of U.S./America is really the language of the indigenous peoples of North America (i.e. American Indians, not politically correct term).
We speak a "form" of English in America but it is not the proper English that they speak across the pond, so I have been told. Not sure if they still speak proper English in England anymore (UK, Britain, whatever).
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Not sure if they still speak proper English in England anymore (UK, Britain, whatever). From what I "saw" when I was there, I would not bet
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The UK, like the US, has numerous different dialects of English. Some people in the UK speak the King's English. Many do not.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I know... that happens with every language.
Compare spanish between Madrid and Sevilla,
or German between Hannover and Regensburg / Ratisbone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: "native" language of U.S./America is really the language of the indigenous peoples of North America You're using the much less common usage of the word "native." If you use the main dictionary definition most commonly used and meant then it is not wrong to say the current native language of the United States is English. According to my aunt's genealogical research I (might) have one direct ancestor from the Powhatan peoples 20 or so generations back; the entirety of the rest on both sides of my family is Scottish, English, Irish, Welsh, with dashes of German and other Western European peoples. But that doesn't mean I'm not a native. I was born on this soil, I am a native, and the majority of those who were born here speak English.
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do. - Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I swear they teach this in the schools. ALL the young kids have weird abbreviations and bastardizations of the common language.
"nah, that guy be trippin'! he be cray-cray in the bray-bray".
Translates to "No. That guy is flipping out! He is crazy in the brain."
So, not at all surprised that a published author does not use complete words in his sentences. Not surprised at all. 
|
|
|
|
|
First time I've seen that. The one I most loathe is probably incent for incentivize.
|
|
|
|
|
Mercifully I've escaped 'incent' so far.
However 'incentivize' itself is an abomination. What's wrong with 'encourage'?
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
True, though incentivize suggests a possible reward, whereas you might encourage with a whip.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know C# but have some idea of what this is about.
Quote: While it’s common to use this support without knowing exactly what’s happening under the hood, Having worked extensively in async systems, there's no way in hell I would use this without knowing what's going on under the hood! Call me a control freak, but I'd roll my own unless I could see how this expanded into source code, or at least something comparable.
Quote: I’m a firm believer that understanding how something actually works helps you to make even better use of it. Knowing how it actually works should be a prerequisite, not a "would be nice".
|
|
|
|
|
It combines the power of large language models (LLMs) with your data in the Microsoft Graph and the Microsoft 365 apps to turn your words into the most powerful productivity tool on the planet. Clippy got a new suit
edit: changed my mind on the blurb
modified 16-Mar-23 13:22pm.
|
|
|
|