|
|
does not answer brief but was not aware of this phenomena so thank-you
|
|
|
|
|
First thing to come to mind when you say "Glitch" is The Matrix, so perhaps a pictuer of Neo's head (complete with cool sunglasses) will do the job
|
|
|
|
|
but you would have to argue that Neo himself was a glitch, I mean clearly he would count (or would he ), but you'd have to explain that all the time. I wonder if a page with data sort of symbol with a zappy line across it might say Matrix glitch better. Especially if it was green pen we used.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, my name is Smith. Agent Smith for you.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, the black cat was the glitch. So a drawing of a cat.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point, and an easy thing to draw
|
|
|
|
|
A glitch is also the name for what happens when a neutron star undergoes a "starquake", changing the frequency of its rotation. Perhaps a picture of a small, vibrating ball...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Like this: its clear; its dissimilar from other symbols; its easy to draw with klutzy IT fingers; and most importantly its really geeky.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: small, relatively small, but only if compared to a star
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: vibrating rotation != vibration
And where are the two death rays it emits at the poles?
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeWraith wrote:
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: vibrating rotation != vibration
The vibrations refer to the starquake, not the rotation.
CodeWraith wrote: And where are the two death rays it emits at the poles?
I also don't show the electro-magnetic field, the gravitational field, and the Cheela living on the neutron star. This is a suggestion for a glyph, not a peer-reviewed article on Relativistic Physics!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: not a peer-reviewed article on Relativistic Physics! Too bad. Should you still write the article, perhaps you should also mention the Hirogen[^] who love to stroll on the surface.
Quote: ...The Hirogen body armor had internal life support, with a breathing apparatus over the mouth and nose, and it can protect a Hirogen hunter while seeking prey in most hostile environments, including the surface of a collapsed star. Good that they have life support when gravity crushes the protons into the neutrons.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: the Cheela living on the neutron star +5 nerd points to Daniel!
(excellent novel, BTW)
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
A fabric with a small hole/defect in it?
noop()
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Mickeysoft logo.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
like the hand with the zappy fingers - retains concept that glitch may be down to user activity after all
|
|
|
|
|
Wow what a site. Four dozens of crocodiles!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another good suggestion, easy to draw and good back story.
|
|
|
|
|
it is the Hamsters. It is ALWAYS the Hamsters.
Noun Project Search[^]
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
How about a little gremlin?
|
|
|
|
|
Actually the first gremlin (again from thenounproject) is quite excellent!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure I like it for glitch but it is excellent, definitely going to use it somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure how you are collecting data but this actually sounds to me as though a bug has been exposed.
If the application/system has the assumption that once a write is issued the data has been saved - this 'glitch' has exposed that as a bug within the system.
It sounds like the bug that has been exposed is that a save is not saved until it has been checked.
A great opportunity for a unit test!
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|