|
Thanks for the tip, I'll keep those in mind for my next printer.
It's good to see there are still developments towards less wasteful practises, and it's not all profit maximalization.
Wout
|
|
|
|
|
For manipulating multiple images off the scanner, try autosplitter.
|
|
|
|
|
The IRS has finally released the 1040 form for year 2017 (although it's still missing the very important, for me at least, 8606 form ), and as usual, I use my PDFXChange 2.5 (Build 309.0) to fill in the forms, thus allowing for a simple printout, sign & date, and snail mail to the IRS. (I cannot simply affix a bitmap of my signature, as the IRS demands real ink , and I always seem to have to send in memo with my return because I seem to always do something that the IRS has not made it easy to do , so I can't do the eFile, and even when I tried, it was far too much work to do, BUT I DIGRESS ...)
Anyway, I have been noticing every year that the textbox (or whatever it's called in PDF) for the Social Security Number always seems to not work properly - when I try to type in my number, it adds an extra space between digits; this would not be so bad, but the last digit of the middle set of digits always seems to be located exactly on a divider. I've been putting up with this every year, but now I'M MAD AS H3LL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!
So before I tell my curmudgeon Senator about this (he's the one that recently asked a judicial nominee some very basic things about being a judge, which the nominee bombed big time), I want to make sure that it's not just a bug with PDFXChange (which if it is, I'm going to complain to them), so I would like folks who have access to Adobe PDF (which should be the standard for the proper behavior of a PDF file) to give this a try, so as to light my path. Of course, if anyone has actually programmed in PDF, that would be even better.
Here is the link to the form: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040.pdf[^]
P.S., As far as I know, PDFXChange is the only FREE PDF app that allows to fill in forms; if there are any suggestions for such a FREE PDF app NOT NAMED FOXIT (I don't care for the junkware), that would be welcomed.
modified 13-Jan-18 1:12am.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried it simply in Chrome browser. (You do know Chrome can fill in pdf forms and save them, right?) Entered 123456789 as SSN. The 3 and 5 sit on the separators. So I'm inclined to say it's the form.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried it with Adobe Reader and it worked fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure you did this scenario correctly? My understanding is that Adobe Reader doesn't allow for any changes, including entering data into textboxes. I'll have to check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe reader has allowed that for a while. I've used it many times.
You may also want to consider OLT.com, which has free federal returns.
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried it with the Adobe pro edition (albeit from about 2012 or so), and got the same results you found. The form is definitely not coded correctly.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I will presume that you have done this correctly, and will complain to my curmudgeon Senator.
|
|
|
|
|
Since blocking ads is stealing according to some, why blocking miners is any different, or even blocking malware?
I mean webmaster implied that cost of viewing the site is your privacy, I you don't like it, don't wa... oh wait, they already got your data!
I block:
- all scripts (only few domains white-listed)
- all cookies (only few domains white-listed)
- ads
- all referral info
Should I block anything else?
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: Should I block anything else?
Your internet connection...
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: or even blocking malware? If you can't see how blocking malware is different than blocking ads then I don't think someone explaining it to you will help.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
But can you see how they're similar?
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: But can you see how they're similar? Only that you don't want either of them.
I receive junk mail but receiving anthrax in my junk mail is quite different.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
011111100010 wrote: you don't want
Stuffing my mailbox with junk so my actual mail cannot fit there is bit more troublesome than "me not wanting junk mail".
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you have a small mailbox.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it could be a case of mailbox envy... But I don't think that is relevant to the OP's question...
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who think there are two kinds of people in the world and the others
|
|
|
|
|
011111100010 wrote: explaining it to you
Please entertain us, but do it from perspective of a site owner.
Bonus question, please define boundary between ads and adware. I mean we should know when we're committing act of stealing and when we're just rightfully blocking something. Is this boundary universal for each and every user?
Btw. you conveniently skipped the first question.
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: adware You're changing the topic. No thanks.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Lol
Malware, short for malicious software, is an umbrella term used to refer to a variety of forms of harmful or intrusive software,[1] including computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, ransomware, spyware, adware, scareware, and other malicious programs.
You're trying really hard to avoid defending your position.
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: sed to refer to a variety of forms of harmful or intrusive software,[1] including computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, ransomware, spyware, adware, scareware, and other malicious programs. Thanks. You proved yourself wrong.
Mladen Janković wrote: You're trying really hard to avoid defending your position. I didn't know it needed defending. I'm OK with you having a different opinion than me.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
011111100010 wrote: Thanks. You proved yourself wrong.
You're not good at this.
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: You're trying really hard to avoid defending your position.
Quite humourous, actually. Much like the entire Democratic party in the US. Hit them with facts, they respond with personal character attacks that have nothing to do with the issue. You can't win this one, Mladen - don't waste your time feeding trolls, unless you really enjoy it. But if you do, feed them with gusto, and have fun with it.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if he's trolling or he's uncomfortable with logical conclusion of his argument
|
|
|
|