|
Brexit
(No idea - it has "exit" for vacate in it?)
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, that's not it, I am afraid.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear! Do I detect a fodder as plural error? Professional bugbear alert:
American celebrity has to vacate
CANCEL (Hidden word)
Unless I'm completely wrong, of course!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Of course that's correct, but why does it need to be singular?
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Because in the wordplay you're using the formula x$ is contained in y$ where, as all programmers should recognise, y$ is a single entity. So AMERICANCELEBRITIES (by convention spaces and punctuation ignored) has CANCEL within it. To prevent that making nonsense of the surface reading of the clue the simplest solution is to make it 'celebrity' instead.
To look at it from the other end, what does 'American celebrities have (ie. contain)' actually mean? Both words ('and' implied) separately contain the answer? Clearly not!
There are, sadly, now a number of editors who would publish your original clue without a second thought (fortunately my editor is not among them) but that's reflective of a general slip in standards of which I most heartily disapprove. Too many would also accept "I am in the cowshed" for BAIRN, for example, where clearly the intent of the wordplay is "I is in the cowshed".
Pedantry, it may be, but not all pedantry is bad. To me Ximene's dictum, "You needn't mean what you say but you must say what you mean" remains sacrosanct no matter how flexible or liberal we become about crosswordese. Just as in English grammar there is but one incontrovertible rule, agreement in number, so in crossword grammar I maintain that both fodder for anagrams, hidden words etc. and answers are singular entities for the purpose of wordplay even if they are plural in their surface sense. Again, to put it in programming language, fodder and answers are always single variables no matter what their contents. So y$ contains x$ even when y$ = "things plural".
It all adds up to more problems for the clue writer to deal with but that's what lifts clue writing from simple engineering to art!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
To add to what you say - to cancel is not to vacate - it was blindingly obvious it was cancel but I wouldn't give hime the benefit of an answer
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
pkfox wrote: to cancel is not to vacate
Well, actually, it is. The legal term for 'cancel' with regard to decisions and judgements is precisely 'vacate'.
Quote: vacate
veɪˈkeɪt,vəˈkeɪt
verb
1.
leave (a place that one previously occupied).
"rooms must be vacated by noon on the last day of your holiday"
synonyms: leave, get out of, move out of, evacuate, quit, go away from, depart from, exit from, withdraw from, pull out of; More
2.
LAW
cancel or annul (a judgement, contract, or charge).
"the Justices vacated a ruling by the federal appeals court"
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Fair dos
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
modified 7-Jun-16 13:49pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! That's quite an eye opener.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
So i finally made it back, sadly we had to get off of Rock am Ring a day earlyier but what should one do if the politician of rheinland-pfalz has no balls
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
modified 7-Jun-16 4:25am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you get struck by lightning then that would fry your balls.
Welcome back!
Kitty at my foot and I waAAAant to touch it...
|
|
|
|
|
Just to inform you, the ones striked by lightning did not listen to the announcements that you should leave the area immediatly and stay away from metal buildings. I saw the lightning stiking between the stage and a box tower.
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Is that what they call Heavy Metal?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Well if AC/DC would have performed Thunderstruck then yes XD
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Too much "High Voltage"
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Movie Quote Of The Day
I believe even the most rational mind can play tricks in the dark.
Which movie?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Hawkins on Spring Break
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
One Night in Paris
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Dark Mind
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
On the one hand there is Paul Thurrott article[^] about Chromebook, explaining that one reason poeple like Chromebook is that they are easy to update / always up to date...
Now there is the furor about automatic Windows update.
I am a little confused as to what really pleases the user now.. No update? automatic update? Both at the same time?!
Is the cat dead? or alive? or both?!
|
|
|
|
|
Only as the particular user desires. I want neither auto-updates, nor a "subscription" plan.
|
|
|
|
|
Never, in the long history of my computer use, have I ever let a program or application update itself automatically.
People who can't understand the sense behind that, and who don't take the time to read release notes, deserve to have the next brain-fart OS like vista or win 8 thrust on them.
They deserve all the ribbons and "alternative interfaces" that consume all their resources but aren't worth cr@p.
They deserve to keep finding that functions they use don't exist or work any more.
They deserve an earful from me, because it's their stupid attitude that allows -- and even encourages -- companies to to get away with the sh1t they pull.
Allowing something as critical as an OS -- which all your other programs (including drivers) depend on -- to auto update isn't just stupidity, it's madness.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|