|
Member 9082365 wrote: surely enough information in the thread title
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Leave Catch Blocks Empty
|
|
|
|
|
ON ERROR RESUME NEXT
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
At least the code won't annoy the user with, "Program stopped working" pop ups.
I'll go with the devil.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptions are for sissies. Programming languages supporting exceptions are toy languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
try
{
...
}
catch
{
throw;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you think an empty catch block is your ally, but you merely adopted bad code. I was born in it, moulded by it. I didn’t see good code until I was already a man; by then, it was nothing to me but a hindrance!
Sorry, had a Batman marathon last night
|
|
|
|
|
I have an old blog, started circa 2010, last article 2012. I wish to reinvent and renew this blog, and would like to 'hide' the old articles. I thought it a perfect idea to shift them into CP, as new articles. Is that type of thing OK with members? There will be no plagiarism or duplication, or even sharing the articles elsewhere.
I want to shift the emphasis of my blog, www.thepraxis.co.za[^], toward more theoretical and academic discussion (with the occasional libelous, mouth-frothing rant), and concentrate my more practical efforts, i.e. coding inventions, how-tos, etc. and concentrate the more practical articles on CodeProject and CodeGuru.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
do you mean to let CP consume only new blog post, but not old? It sounds to me perfectly Ok...
See here how you can sign only specific blogs for CP, but not others...http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/BlogFeed.aspx[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Old blog articles as CodeProject new articles? Why would anyone read more than 3 years old articles?
May I be bold enough to suggest the opposite: The old blog articles remains on your blog while you post your future new articles on CodeProject.
|
|
|
|
|
Shao Voon Wong wrote: Why would anyone read more than 3 years old articles?
Because they may be still relevant?
I see for example, that many of your articles predate August 2012. Do I take it you are about to delete them all?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still getting voluminous download from and old 2009 set of articles, winforms of all things!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a problem, provided they come over as good articles - but you've been here more than long enough to know which are and which aren't, and which are still relevant.
I'd say go for it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Next week at this time I'll be waking up HERE^
I'll be away until they make me leave.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
No kids allowed? Damn fine idea for a holiday!
Enjoy yourself!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I think I can speak for the whole of CP... We all hate you! At least until they make you leave there!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I once went to a weekend-vacation (3 days) without the kids - I was missing them on the second day...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: I was missing them on the second day
Then you didn't do it right
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Once I missed them on purpose, in order to go to vacation alone.
|
|
|
|
|
I know I speak for all of us at CP when I say,
It looks like a horrid vacation. Just horrid.
I watched the video and have numerous questions:
1. Where are the computers?
2. Where are the tellies?
3. All that fruit...Where is the bacon?
Did you have to pay to go to this prison island or are you being sent there for some heinous crime?
Have fun, I'm stuck in my Nowhere Land, making all my Nowhere Plans with Nobody.
|
|
|
|
|
But it's not clothing optional? WTE? Can't fully relax that way.
|
|
|
|
|
Well - we've been to their sister resort, Couples Tower Isle - and they promote themselves on the clothing-optional Island they own (w/bar, food brought for meals, etc.).
Actually - as I heard it from reliable sources - it was clothing optional until they heard I had made reservations. Not enough Gange on the entire island of Jamaica to 'cover that up'.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Do let us know if you found Paradise, immediately upon your arrival.
Anyhow, have a great time! I'm sure you earned it.
|
|
|
|