|
NO running away is not the answer and i find that poking a peeping tom in the eys soon stops them.
|
|
|
|
|
Dr Gadgit wrote: NO running away is not the answer
Well you are certainly right about that. What you should really do instead is to run as quickly as you can to your medical professional and have them up your medication.
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
The argument is not if ISP's can intercept our password but are they and I happen to think they are so save the insults because it makes you look like a kid in the school playground.
You need to stop taking the medication you want me to take and start thinking for yourself!
|
|
|
|
|
Hiiiiiiiiiiiighlanders!!!!!!!
B
MCAD
---
|
|
|
|
|
Earthman, it is sometimes difficult to follow your mode of speech!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't go to that barber !
|
|
|
|
|
You think you might lose your head?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
A strange claim for a film which had four sequels.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
...all of them total twaddle.
I mean - the first wasn't good (Herself is a Queen fan, so I had to watch it quite a few times) but the others? Good grief, I'd rather watch Sharknado for it's incredible realism...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I'd rather watch Sharknado for it's incredible realism...
How about the sequels - The Second One[^] and Oh Hell No![^]?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, For Elephants Sake!
They made sequels?
Why does that smell of money laundering?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Not quite what I was expecting. But congrats to them. I had no preference in the game.
|
|
|
|
|
I see so many sample code on this page and plan to take a deep dive on these samples.
Do you have any suggestion/feedback on this page?
https://code.msdn.microsoft.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
You would be better off reading articles here. The good ones tell you why the code is the way it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone used / use CodeFluent's Entities Professional? I qualify for a free license for a year. In the past, when I've used products like this, they generated a bunch of gobble de gook code, but the process looks intriguing.
Appreciate your thoughts....
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
After an awful interview on Thursday (one of the interviewers walked out to take an important call on his mobile!) Had an a hopeful interview today. The best part was when I was told one the Recruitment Agents (from the description I think I know who it was) handed the employer a CV in 'their' format was asked if he wanted to interview them, replied 'not really, the details aren't there', was handed a second format of the same person to which he replied 'Yes, so much so I am interviewing him tomorrow', It was my CV! Do these 'professionals' know what they are doing?
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote: Do these 'professionals' know what they are doing?
No.
|
|
|
|
|
They're called 'pimps' for a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Cynical but accurate.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote: Do these 'professionals' know what they are doing? I don't think anyone really knows what he's doing...
We're all just a bunch of bunglers
|
|
|
|
|
It has been shown in many studies that the vast majority of interview processes result in the wrong candidate being offered the job. So, you're in with a chance!
|
|
|
|
|
I would love to glance over a few of those studies.
|
|
|
|