The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.
In the Norwegian Parliament there has been lots of hair-splitting cases whether the President of the Parliament should reprimand a speaker for using unacceptable language or not. Characterizing another member of the Parliament is almost never accepted, while characterizing a statement, which everyone knows who made, as utter nonsense is much more likely to be accepted.
Maybe "moronic" is so insulting that it wouldn't be accepted at all in our Parliament. But "nonsense" is certainly acceptable. Besides, there are a few recognized modifiers: You could e.g. say that claiming that schoolbags made of clear plastic improves security is, with all due respect, utter nonsense. The "with all due respect" really is the opposite ... You use it to indicate that you really have no respect, but since you explicitly indicate that you are aware that you are bordering on the respectless but will not cross the line, you may actually do that: Cross the line to the respectless. It is like "I usually have respect for the speaker before me, but this time... well..."
The point was that the super portrays himself as someone who's truly nicey-nice, and condemns everyone who displayed even the mildest of aggression in an argument. However, he personally attacked someone and then went on a spree to justify it, and basically reduced it to an English/grammar question.
There is a difference between stating someone is something and implying they might be one. Te difference is whether you are correct or not in either or both judgements.
"You are a moron." is explicit.
To this, I'd say that one must first be or have had been one to know what one is, that being a moron.
"Your statement is moronic." is implicative, that what someone has stated seems it is not valid or justified in a way upon which you are basing your judgement foundations to qualify such.
To this, again, I'd say that one must first have said one to know one, what a moronic statement is. More
Both are subjective statements. As such, both are accurate and inaccurate at the same instance.
The best way to improve Windows is run it on a Mac.
The best way to bring a Mac to its knees is to run Windows on it.
~ my brother Jeff
I have optimized one store procedure. Original is taking 35 seconds to take data and new SP is taking more than 1 min.
So, I tried to make the replica of same SP with the same code, even that is taking more than 1 min.
Summary is, new replica of same SP is taking also more than 1 min.
Please suggests, if any one faced this issue. This is very urgent issue.
Start by reading the text at the top of the page and you will see in bright red letters that this isn't the place for technical queries. So if you want to make people happy, post this in the right place. Happy people give better help than annoyed ones do...
Post it here:http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/ask.aspx[^] but think first: Remember that we can't see your screen, access your HDD, or read your mind - we only get what you tell us to work from. So write your question based on that!
Explain exactly what you have tried, and where you are stuck. The more accurate you are the better the response.
Oh, and don't stress the urgency - every question is urgent to the person who needs an answer! All that your stressing the urgency does is to make us think you have left it too late, and want us to do it for you. This annoys some people, and can slow a response.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!