The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.
I'm a native French speaker (French Canadian), and have always had good grades in French while in school. While I have a bit of a knack for spotting common mistakes, I find I rather suck at explaining why they're mistakes as I have no ability to explain grammatical rules such as they exist. I think like a software developer, and I would have a very hard time coming up with any sort of algorithm to do anything with sorting out proper grammar--I wouldn't know where to begin.
I understand your situation completely. I am a native English speaker from England (although now living in the colonies (US)) and have always prided myself on my correct English grammar, spelling and pronunciation. I am usually sought as the source of correct answers in my office and amongst my friends whenever a dispute on "correct English" comes up.
However, why exactly what I say is correct I can never explain using all those "future perfect, pluperfect, etc." words I might once have learned in school (many, many decades ago)- it just is, and somehow I know it, and everyone also accepts it once I state it is so - so it must be!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
While all french speakers would know exactly what you mean, I think they'd all agree it's a bit unusual to use these individual words in this fashion. "Voici les details du projet" would be more appropriate. Also, because you used "sont"--plural--I'm assuming you meant to pluralize "details". Besides, you'd always be speaking of terms of "the details of the project", not "the detail of the project".
Keep in mind this is only a minor Thing but for me a big Thing to communicate in French in an acceptable manner
You'd be understood without any problem, but there's nothing wrong with striving to get better.
I don't think I have ever used the word 'voici' in speech.
It's one of those words that you will find in formal writing but generally not in speech, except for perhaps very formal French speech(watch 'La Vie est un long fleuve tranquille' for a good parodie of formal French).
One might say 'voici donc' if one were to be very formal when for example laying out a proposition.
I would use something like "ci-dessous" if I was going to use it in the context of "see below".
Disclaimer - I don't currently use French daily but I was raised bilingual.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
I know politics are not allowed but I can't help myself, have to post.
>“I don’t know Mr Libby,” Mr Trump said in a quote provided alongside a statement announcing
>the pardon, “but for years I have heard that he has been treated unfairly. Hopefully this full
>pardon will help rectify a very sad portion of his life.”