|
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best, and since that's the bit I'm most interested in, well oops. The next version of R# holds more interest for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best
Speaking of which. The JustDecompile from Telerik that you linked to the other day is a little suss in that respect too. Not in it's reliability but in its attempts at source code.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
|
|
|
|
|
Funnily enough, I noticed that later on.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best
I find it telling how we're all so used to stuff just not working as advertised.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
|
|
|
|
|
We've tested all features outlined in Introducing JetBrains dotPeek[^]. If any of them are known to be not working reliably enough, there's always a "Known issue" mark there.
As an additional line of defense, this is the _very first_ public build, and we're not even calling it a Beta (as opposed to certain vendors).
Please let us know what exactly is not working as advertised for you.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
There's only one public build available at the moment (published yesterday), so unless you're a JetBrains insider, I'm pretty much sure you have the latest build.
What do you mean by "view source code"? Do you mean the decompilation functionality per se, or reconstructing code from PDBs downloaded from a symbol server?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I mean the decompilation functionality. There have been certain cases where it's just not shown the decompiled source. Closing and restarting seems to fix it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK. Next time it happens I'll try to report exactly what went wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I'll wait until it comes out of Beta: "remember that we don't perform extensive testing before publishing the bits here, so they might not work or even harm your computer"
I know it's just legalese boilerplate, but I can wait... 
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
Why this article:
Bypassing UAC with User Privilege under Windows Vista/7 - CodeProject
has been suspended?
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Google[^]
Possibly because it looks to be an exploit that breaks security - I dunno, just going by the loose description on Google:
"A Design Flaw in Windows Kernel API Leads to Security Breakdown; Author: noobpwnftw; Section: Vista Security; Chapter: Platforms, Frameworks & Libraries."
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
You give no link and anyway the Site Bugs/Suggestions-forum would be a better place for your question.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the content was either very poor or inappropriate: you should email CP directly: you can find the address in the About[^] page.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
I remember this one. If I remember correctly, it was deleted to give Microsoft a chance to correct the flaw in the kernel. Normally when an exploit is found by a responsible source, the company is given a chance to address the issue before the flaw is released into the wild. In this case, the exploit was released before MS had a chance to do anything about it.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel pretty good, aside from some residual pain and swelling. I lost 30 pounds in the last 14 days. Will I keep it off...who knows? 
Coming off of the pain medication has been a real PITA but I am getting better.
I have about 200+ e-mails in my inbox ready for deletion and a stack of requests/mods/enhancements and standard B.S. on my desk a mile high. Man, it's good to be back!
--
You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Good to hear that everything went ok
With friendly greetings,
Eric Goedhart
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: and a stack of requests/mods/enhancements and standard B.S. on my desk a mile
high. Man, it's good to be back!
Never forget to set the highest priority for you health
WJFK (Write Just for Kicks)
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Will I keep it off
Probably not! 
Welcome back!
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome Back, glad your on the road to recovery.
Only 200+ email after 14 days, they obviously didn't miss you that much 
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: I lost 30 pounds in the last 14 days
You obviously didn't eat enough ice cream as part of your recovery protocol.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
Good, I hope no-one makes you laugh.
Oops! 
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[ ^]
"Program as if the technical support department is full of serial killers and they know your home address" - Ray Cassick Jr., RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: I lost 30 pounds in the last 14 days. Will I keep it off...who knows? 
You cares, it'll be fun gaining it back!
Glad to see you're back 
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. "
— Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
