|
Strange, not the icons part which can be from a wrong graphics card driver or needing an update, but the logon... I've never needed that when I installed W10, which was smooth and worked perfectly, except for the main software I use at work... (a specific industrial thing).
|
|
|
|
|
I too disliked the option to log on with my MS account, but once I got used to it, it adds some nice functionality to the OS. For example: After I did my laptop, the desktop background picture suddenly matched the picture on my desktop machine. When you log on with your MS account, MS will upload some of your personal preferences and implement it for you on all your machines sharing that MS account. Some people may not like the fact that MS uploads their personal preferences, but I am not that paranoid about MS. 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
pkfox wrote: also I'm forced to logon to my pc using my Microsoft account which I don't want to do
Go to Settings, Accounts. You should see a "Sign in with a local account instead" option.
But as others have pointed out, logging in with a MS account will make a lot of settings available across your different machines/devices if you also use that account to login, which has its advantages.
|
|
|
|
|
pkfox wrote: I'm forced to logon to my pc using my Microsoft account
Someone wasn't paying attention during the update then! You were offered a choice! You can revert to the old account still but you'll then have to manually change the permissions on all your documents.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
pkfox wrote: do you think a clean install is a good idea ?
No, because then you have to buy win10 instead of getting the upgrade for free. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you do until the July deadline has passed
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
You can get a free copy of Win10 without upgrading?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
You are supposed to be able to activate the 10586 build with a Win 7 or 8 activation code, but I have never tried that, so I cannot confirm that it will work. If you do a clean install AFTER the free upgrade, you do not need the activation code and you get it for free. Just make sure the upgrade is activated, before doing the clean install. I've gone that route on several machines of family members and it worked every time. The clean install was free in every case.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: You are supposed to be able to activate the 10586 build with a Win 7 or 8 activation code
Ah, I see. I was not aware of that.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you check if it's activated ?
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Go to Control Panel => System. It will say near the bottom whether it's activated or not.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't show anything - also my display is awful - I'm at the point of reverting back 
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect it may have used your old display driver, and that driver is not playing well with 10. Before I give up, I would try to update the display driver. Do you know how to do that? With a clean install Win 10 should find and install the correct driver.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
"You'll be back." (in my best Arnold accent) 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I'm back already - the problems I was having reminded me of when I first installed Red Hat all those years ago
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Note that after you do the upgrade, grab a Windows 10 iso install and burn media. You can then do a clean install and it will register using your login account.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday's XKCD.
Wonderful idea, especially for Kindle books (lousy justification).
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
🍄
🐍
Good thing CP supports badgers natively, there doesn't seem to be a proper Unicode character for it.
|
|
|
|
|
aaryan42 wrote: Good thing CP supports badgers natively, there doesn't seem to be a proper Unicode character for it.
My poor old eyes must be going.. they look like pandas to me
The whole thing's rigged to blow, touch those tanks and "boooom"!
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
They are obviously trans-species icons! They might even be dancing nuns (if you squint a lot while looking at them).
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Dancing nuns?? Let me go take another look..
The whole thing's rigged to blow, touch those tanks and "boooom"!
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
What a piece of crap. It does not reliably play videos in ANY format I've tried. With a single file, I've observed the following behaviors (with a program restart between each observation):
- The video plays fine
- The video plays with considerable artifacts
- The video's first frame appears and I get audio
- The video's first frame appears and I DON'T get audio
- The audio plays but I get no video at all
In VLC and WMP, the video plays fine - every time.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know if it will help any but I found this.
i cri evry tiem
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I found that too, but I don't have the time right now to refactor the code.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It internally uses DirectX, so perhaps upgrading to the latest version of DirectX may help with this somewhat.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: It internally uses DirectX
That got me thinking:
VLC itself has an option somewhere (Tools, Preferences, Video, Output--at least in version 2.2.2) that lets you define what to use for rendering video, and is doesn't use DX by default if I'm not mistaken. If VLC was reconfigured to use DX, I wouldn't be entirely surprised if it then also started exhibiting the same behavior.
Which brings me to wonder whether the WPF element has any such similar option that can be tweaked to match whatever VLC uses.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
