|
For parsing, yet. I was just thinking you might be able to use that to do the parsing, and then convert the returned AST to CodeDom somehow.
But I've not really used it, so maybe this idea is more "CodeDumb". 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I mean, i guess i could do that but i have a feeling translating and transferring from their object model to CodeDOMs would be about as much work as the parsing in the first place.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Way to lose a location (5)
|
|
|
|
|
Ikea is 4 
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope (answer's up on my profile page if you're stumped)
|
|
|
|
|
I selected VSTS in Tools=>Options=>Source Control=>Plugin
When I attempt to add a solution to VSTS, a Git message pops up. When I go back into the options dialog, Git is selected.
I DON'T WANT GIT.
How can I force Visual Studio to use VSTS???
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Either:
1) Use your incredible powers of persuasion.
Or
2) Get Luke to do it.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Get Luke to do it.
Yes! Lucky Luke can work wonders! Would you expect anything less from a Belgian cowboy? 
Lucky Luke - Wikipedia[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Well that was totally useless
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I'm here for!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Not totally useless. To get to totally you need about a dozen smart ass and snarky posts from all of the old timers hereabouts.  .
I, for one, like Roman Numerals.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a hint.
Not even MS wants you to use VSTS.
|
|
|
|
|
It's there for me (although it's named Visual Studio Team Foundation Server).
I get a warning that my current project is controlled by a different source control plug-in, but I can still continue.
What version of VS are you using? I'm on 2019.
If you have an Azure DevOps account that has both Git and TFVC you will need Visual Studio 2015 Update 1 or later to view TFVC and Git repositories in team projects that include both types.
A serious suggestion here, Microsoft has deprecated TFVC and really wants you to use Git.
So perhaps you can migrate your current project to Git and be up-to-date and also have it work in VS?
Kevin Marois wrote: When I attempt to add a solution to VSTS, a Git message pops up. When I go back into the options dialog, Git is selected.
Not sure what you mean though.
I guess VSTS is Azure DevOps, but you were talking about Visual Studio.
Are you attempting to create a new project in DevOps using TFVC?
|
|
|
|
|
Is butter a habitual contrarian?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
But ... but ... but: How many buts does it take to make a butter?
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy say that this will probably churn up comments until I scream...
But really - what does butter have to do with a nun that is always disagreeing with you?
I, for one, like Roman Numerals.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you want to butter?
They call me different but the truth is they're all the same!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
In the words of Vicky Pollard - Yeah, but no, but yeah but no but..
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
I'm melting ....
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Just found an interesting question in SO. Some guy wants to apply Google tests to embedded STM32 program. To do this, they decided to write the STM32 HAL emulation (probably, to run such tests on a PC). Of course, after writing the whole HAL emulation (!!!) they have hundreds linker errors and want to know, how to fix them. But this is not a point.
The interesting thing is the idea to make HAL emulation for running Google tests. Isn't this crazy?
Finally, their hardware device will be part of some bigger thing. Like aircraft. After aircraft crash, they can say "But Google tests are OK!".
In my company, when somebody tries to talk about Google tests for embedded programs, or code analysis for embedded programs (kind of Coverity, no goto please!), or Agile hardware development, I brutally refuse to talk about this. Hope this will never happen.
|
|
|
|
|
11917640 Member wrote: hundreds linker errors and want to know, how to fix them.
Carefully. Very, very carefully.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
On a serious note, what are they going to use to Google test the HAL Emulator? 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
They could write a meta-emulator which emulates the test environment for emulated HAL.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
"It's emulators all the way down!"
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
