|
Nice thanks
I'm not sure how many it cookies it makes to be happy, but so far it's not 27.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Brady,
QQ: Where did you purchase the Python courses? Just curious...I'm self-teaching at the moment, but am on the lookout for something a bit more formalized.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was on special with online store Popular Science Shop, this course bundle[^].
"'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself."
—Aleister Crowley
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks Brad. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
Lovely language for masses, still using = for assign a value, and == for checking equality, as it is taught in elementary school.
Had one live project, IoT on Linux, of course same Python, same libraries behaved differently (on level of not working) on different distros (RPi)
Recommended for people still have resources and time for reinvent the wheel.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Brad, Sounds like you really like the courses you got - what was the name and source of those courses. My friend is looking to learn Python and would appreciate a pointer to where you got the courses. - Thanks, Bob.
|
|
|
|
|
I bought a bundle of 12 courses from the online Popular Science Shop. The bundle isn't just pure Python, it's geared toward machine learning and data science, but I'm finding all the apps I build on a course to be great for learning Python.
"'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself."
—Aleister Crowley
|
|
|
|
|
|
last few weekends done some messing with python on raspberry pi
the whole programming in terminal, even just short bits, is a whole different thing.
as for python
clear line error and message is great
the white spacing I still dont understand how it is easier for new comers?
"inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation"
Then you got messing with getting modules before you can run
module for everything. But if you keep in mind with C#, most everything written is with .net framework which is a module, and compiling just hides some of that import and referencing header.
|
|
|
|
|
Eid Mubarak to everyone! ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Please stay safe, stay at home, and remember everyone in your prayers, especially those who are going through the hardships of this difficult time.
Here is a recipe guide to make sewaiyyan at home: http://dailywhatz.com/health/recipes/how-to-make-delicious-sewayyian/
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: Eid Mubarak to everyone! [Rose]
Ditto 
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: Here is a recipe
Tx
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Eid, everyone!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I've never seen a parser's output end up so confusing. The Roslyn API had an entire team behind it. Well my team consists of me, myself and I. Despite that, Slang (which parses C# similar to roslyn), while somewhat more limited than Roslyn in functionality, produces a much easier to use result than Roslyn.
What gives? I don't have a team to hash out the surface area of the API. They do. And from where I sit, they did a poor job of it. It's way too complicated for what it is.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
And all three of you agree that Roslyn API is nasty? 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
All of the voices in my head can confirm. 
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
At least I know that the voices in my head aren't real - but the ideas they come up with are AWESOME!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I profoundly agree with this.
I'm totally serious though - related when I went manic for a week it was a hell of an experience. Lots of what I call "productive delusions". Ideas I came to in a manic state where I was delusional but very creative, and despite being a product of delusional thinking patterns I learned a lot from them - stuff I still carry with me.
Never underestimate the mad.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Excuse me, I didn't know about that. Now I'm afraid that my last post could be hurtful.
This was / is not my intention.
Please sorry again 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
No, nothing like that. I wasn't offended in any way, I was just reflecting on what Griff said. No worries.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, :relieved:
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty easy going about the fact that I'm mad. Basically, at this point it's part of my aesthetic. 
As far as coding, I think it helps, though I guess people that consume my articles are the ultimate judge of that. Ha!
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Excuse me, I didn't know about that.
@code-witch uses single line if and for statements.
Even "single line" for statements in other for statements 
The madness is pretty obvious I think... 
|
|
|
|
|
for(var x=0;x<width;++x)
for(var y=0;y<height;++y)
if(0==(x % y))
graphics.DrawPoint(x,y,Color.Red);
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Both using braces and indenting is, in principle reudundant, I can't protest against that.
One of the most common problems (although in the "minor" class - they are almost always caught by the compiler) is getting the braces and indentations right - especially in C-like languages where the closing brace is "anonymous", with no indication of what it closes (no ENDFOR, OD, ENDWHILE or anything of that sort.
So I see the redundancy as a great aid to getting things right: There is never an opening brace without an indent, and never an indent without an opening brace. Never an undent without a closing brace, never a closing brace without an undent.
When an indent may or may not come with another level of bracing, and the next statement following that for-for-if were (incorrectly) indented or undented, and the function goes on for thirty lines with this mis-indentation, it could be difficult to spot the location of the missing or extra brace. The compiler will hopefully tell you that something is wrong, but it might require some work to decide what is wrong: Maybe the next statement really belongs within the inner for-loop, so the problem was a missing brace, not an incorrect indentation.
So, I go for redundancy: Neither indentation nor braces, or both indentation and braces. For the last if-statement: If you don't want the braces, then rather put it all on one line (as long as it doesn't exceed 70 chars). You know that after an if-condition, the rest of the line is either a single, short expression which is the entire if-clause, or a brace that opens an indented block. (The only thing that may follow an opening brace is an end-of-line comment.)
Obviously, the compiler doesn't care. This is only for my own sake, to make it easier for myself to spot where there is an error in the nesting levels.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
