|
Oh right. Yes: I'd forgotten that those cost $100,000 or whatever a Tesla costs these days.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh... I didn't know there was a dollar limit on the topic.
People will pay for convenience. Once the majority of kinks are worked out, self driving cares will be as safe or safer than human driven cars but more convenient for many people.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here; move along.
Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
You should ask ChapGPT to do the project management for you and see how it goes 
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea! But I fear the plant would only generate power when the Sun is shining from the Left.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
The risk is not AI taking over the world.
The risk is people actively trying to use it to assert dominance.
As part of the Russian-Chinese trade agreement, for example, Russia proposes 'their' cutting edge AI research is made available to China. Thing is, Russia doesn't do a whole lot of original research in the area, but they do actively encourage certain groups loosely-affiliated with them to experiment and innovate in that area, with no oversight.
So basically, it matters that we act responsibly, but more importantly, we need to prepare and act pro-actively to detect and actively counter active threats. If one group creates a malicious AI, you basically need a more advanced and specialized AI system to actively counter that threat.
GPT suggests, beyond educating people to be responsible (not seeing that happen soon), to increase research pace toward early detecting systems and monitoring systems. Since we build GPT explicitly to help us and foster good relationships, it will do just that. Let's not be blind toward projects that are run with the sole purpose of creating threats, and actively prepare for them and think about how to counter them.
We still have the luxury of time at this point, let's not waste it, and keep ahead of the curve.
|
|
|
|
|
Kate-X257 wrote: we need to prepare and act pro-actively to detect and actively counter active threats. If one group creates a malicious AI, you basically need a more advanced and specialized AI system to actively counter that threat.
So we should focus on that one AI versus the potential millions of people around the world that continuously seek active harm through technology?
|
|
|
|
|
To give an example:
Phishing and social engineering are examples of threats.
Due to AI being employed, these threats will scale up in scope and effectiveness.
I propose we use AI to counter these threats more effectively.
Nowhere do I claim we should focus on AI as a threat.
I explicitly started with: it's not a threat.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not afraid on them taking over the world, I'm afraid that they'll turn out like the ones in 'The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy' and they'll be insistently and annoyingly 'helpful', whether you like it or not.
Share And Enjoy.mp3 [^]
|
|
|
|
|
They can't do a worse job than humans have been doing for the last 2000 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Wait what? They were doing a good job before then?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, they build Stonehenge, The pyramids, and Teotihuacán
|
|
|
|
|
I read somewhere from a time traveler that an AI would be running the world at some point. People have found that an AI does a much better and fairer job than politicians.
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Patin wrote: I read somewhere from a time traveler
Did the time traveler provide any information about future stock market trends?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Invest in time travelling companies! 
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, there'll never be such a thing as True AI (you can't design something you can't describe: now describe yourself -- what are you? Now design it!).
The more worrying aspect is that at some point, some idiot in a position of power far too high for his ability will use something like ChatGPT to write a critical system for - say - a nuclear power station, believing that the AI is real, and that it knows what it's doing...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
The subject says it. Once before I fixed a widget that had gone bang on a Friday, today the same widget totally different issue, fixed it. Why do these things go bang on Thursday nights & Friday mornings. A time when you want to winding down... 
|
|
|
|
|
For the same reason that if you have a doctors, dentist, other appointment at 11:30 AM, things will go bang about 11:00 AM, and need an hour to fix. The universe hates me.
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
Quoting Mr. Murphy: "it has been forever thus..."
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the corollaries to Murphy's Law: "When a device fails, it will do so in the manner that will cause the most damage."
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
too "Expletive Deleted" true! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh, Commit Strip,  If it wasn't true it wouldn't be funny...
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me about it!
I'm working on a child's game that uses a voice playback module to give random instructions to a child, they press a button and the next instruction is given. Simple, had it working perfectly.
So my SO recorded a bunch more instructions, I downloaded them to the board and now everything went to hell in a hand basket.
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork3 wrote: Why do these things go bang on Thursday nights & Friday mornings
The real answer is because Workers don't start doing anything during the work-week until sometime around 10am on Thursdays.
All that activity creates a huge strain on your software / hardware and things break. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
