|
if your sub application has a dispose method can't you just, instead of application.exit() put in this.dispose() ??
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with Stefan on this one. Closing an application that your application launched will not affect the parent app. I also think you're using Form and Application interchangably.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
well.. I'm sorry what I said wasn't clear. the application I'm talking about is something like a package that has to provide more than one tool. This package launches two other applications: an editor application and a wizard (the wizard consists of several forms that call each other in a certain sequence to accomplish its task).
I can't make the package MDIParent of the the other two applciations since the editor is already MDIParent and can't be a prent and child at the same time.
Although the editor application uses Application.Exit() when it's closed, the launching package is not affected, but closing the wizard ends the application. I'll try to use this.Dispose() to exit the wizard.
thanx for everything
|
|
|
|
|
I have two functions:
void foo(params someRefObject[] arr);
and
void foo(someRefType o);
When I call foo(someRefInstance) , which of them will be called? And what about foo(null) ?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I did some checks, and I got the following:
foo(null) won't compile, but foo((someRefType)null) , and foo(someRefInstance) will both call foo(someRefType o) .
I wonder if it will be the same in the next version of .Net.
Yaakov
|
|
|
|
|
What are the differences, if any?
Thanks,
Yaakov
|
|
|
|
|
When using out , the parameter needn't be initialized before being passed to into the method, and it must be assigned a value before the method exits.
If you need more info, I'd suggest looking in the docs[^].
Charlie
if(!curlies){ return; }
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot.
Actually, I've read rhe docs before, but I didn't notice this difference.
Yaakov.
|
|
|
|
|
int a,b,c,d,e,f,g = foo(out a, out b, out c, out d, out e, out f);
vs
int a,b,c,d,e,f;
a=b=c=d=e=f=0;
int g = foo(ref a, ref b, ref c, ref d, ref e, ref f);
so, about 2 lines :->
top secret Download xacc-ide 0.0.3 now! See some screenshots
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice! I didnt know that one.
But I wonder if it is good style to declare more than one variable on one line. Most coding styles would forbid it.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello folks. I have been getting a lot of incredible help on this fourm and I would like to thank everyone that really helped. But if you bare with me I still have couple of shnags in the app I am writting. I have implemented the IDocHostUIHandler especially to be able to send feedback from the Browser control to the Host window form. One the IDocHostUIHandler methods is ShowContextMenu. I have been having problems showing the context menu when I navigate to a document and I specify the frame name in the call to Navigate. Anybody has any ideas
Elie
|
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to it!
Been looking for some examples on this!
|
|
|
|
|
I created an app in VB that used SQLDMO to script objects in an SQL database. I am trying to write one in C# and I have run into a problem. In order to script user defined functions you need to reference "SQLDMO._Database2". However, I get the following error
Cannot implicitly convert type 'SQLDMO._Database' to 'SQLDMO._Database2'
when trying to execute this line
SQLDMO._Database2 ndb = svr.Databases.Item(a+1,"dbo");
I don't understand why this is happening, I also changed the following reference
SQLDMO.SQLServer svr = new SQLDMO.SQLServerClass();
to
SQLDMO.SQLServer2 svr = new SQLDMO.SQLServer2Class();
and I still get the same error. Any ideas???
|
|
|
|
|
I tried this and it worked fine:
ArrayList funcs = new ArrayList();
foreach( SQLDMO.Database2 db2 in srv.Databases )
{
foreach( SQLDMO.UserDefinedFunction func in db2.UserDefinedFunctions )
{
funcs.Add( func.Name );
}
}
I think that the problem may be the SQLDMO._Database2. Just use SQLDMO.Database2 (without the underscore) instead.
And one other thing, I declare my sql server this way:
SQLDMO.SQLServer srv = new SQLDMO.SQLServer();
Hope that helps.
-Matt
------------------------------------------
The 3 great virtues of a programmer:
Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.
--Larry Wall
|
|
|
|
|
I made the changes that you suggested but I am still getting the same error. Here is the code that I am using. I have changed it to reflect some of your suggestions.
<code>
SQLDMO.SQLServer svr = new SQLDMO.SQLServer();
svr.Connect(SVRName,"username","password");
//I loop through the databases to see if it is in the list
for(int a=0;a <= svr.Databases.Count;a++)
{
if(svr.Databases.Item(a+1,"dbo").Name == DBName)
{
//If it is in the list I need to set the database but
//Here is the line that gives me the error
SQLDMO.Database2 db = svr.Databases.Item(DBName,"dbo");
for (int b = 0; b <= m_ScriptFlags.Count - 1; b++)
{
FlagItem = m_ScriptFlags[b].ToString();
if (m_ScriptFlags[b].ToString() == "UDF")
for (int c = 0; c <= db.UserDefinedFunctions.Count ; c++)
//Then do the scripting or whatever needs to be done
</code>
|
|
|
|
|
I recently wrote an article[^] for codeproject where the application involved uses a utility class for generating scripts. Here is the pertinent method from that class:
public static string GetScript(string hostName, string dbName, string username, string password, string prefix )
{
SQLDMO.SQLServer srv = new SQLDMO.SQLServer();
if( username.Length <= 0 )
{
srv.LoginSecure = true;
srv.Connect( hostName, "", "" );
}
else
srv.Connect(hostName, username, password );
SQLDMO.SQLDMO_SCRIPT_TYPE param = SQLDMO_SCRIPT_TYPE.SQLDMOScript_Default |
SQLDMO.SQLDMO_SCRIPT_TYPE.SQLDMOScript_Indexes |
SQLDMO_SCRIPT_TYPE.SQLDMOScript_Drops |
SQLDMO_SCRIPT_TYPE.SQLDMOScript_OwnerQualify;
string script = "";
foreach(SQLDMO.Database db in srv.Databases)
{
if(db.Name!=null && db.Name.ToLower().Equals(dbName.ToLower()) )
{
foreach( SQLDMO.Table table in db.Tables )
{
if( table.Name.ToLower().StartsWith( prefix.ToLower() ) )
{
script += table.Script( param, null, null, SQLDMO.SQLDMO_SCRIPT2_TYPE.SQLDMOScript2_Default );
}
}
foreach( SQLDMO.StoredProcedure proc in db.StoredProcedures )
{
if( proc.Name.ToLower().StartsWith( prefix.ToLower() ) )
{
script += proc.Script( param, null, SQLDMO.SQLDMO_SCRIPT2_TYPE.SQLDMOScript2_Default );
}
}
break;
}
}
return script;
}
Notice that I don't use the Databases.Item method. Instead I iterate through until I find the one with the name equal to the name of the db I want. I'm not sure if this matters, but hopefully it can be of some help.
Also notice that I am not using the Database2 object, however, after a few tests with using the same code and the Database2 object instead on my local machine, I am convinced it does work the way you expect--it will just provide you with the list of functions you need instead sprocs and tables.
Best Regards.
-Matt
p.s. All of this *may* be a moot point if you don't have the latest service pack for SQL Server 2K, though this is just a hunch and may not be related and/or causing the problem.
------------------------------------------
The 3 great virtues of a programmer:
Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.
--Larry Wall
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! I have noticed that it works when you iterate through until you find the one that you are looking for. In VB you could just reference the object you wanted and go on from there. Here is another gotcha that I know I am going to run into. In the scripting app I wrote in VB I could get the dependencies of the views. This was handy for the DBA when running the script (all in one file). This did away with the errors stating invalid object name due to a view referencing another view that hadn't been created yet but it was further down in the script. By chance have you done anything with the dependencies?
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, no. Following dependencies is something that I've been wanting to learn more about, but haven't had the time. I'm just waiting for a project to come around where I will be forced to learn it.
Good luck.
-Matt
------------------------------------------
The 3 great virtues of a programmer:
Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.
--Larry Wall
|
|
|
|
|
I'm making a traffic shaper for Windows in c#. So far I've got the monitoring part, but I was breaking my head over the part to limit peoples bandwidth. What I need to do is (literally):
"shaping incoming packets is done indirectly through the outgoing queues (by scheduling TCP ACK packets)"
Any idea how i can schedule these packets?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello friends I want to make a mirror print to any document,take this document and send to printer whit a printing mirror,this printer is available for this,sorry for my english,help me!!
S.
bigmega
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect you'll need to print to a bitmap, flip that then print it.
Christian
I have several lifelong friends that are New Yorkers but I have always gravitated toward the weirdo's. - Richard Stringer
|
|
|
|
|
christian I need to print a word document in mirrored output,I want something that let me take any document not bitmap and make mirroring ,can do behind the send the command the printer or make a flip created for me,understand me??
S.
bigmega
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I understood you the first time. I still don't know that it can be done, that is, I doubt you can tell a printer to flip the image, and I don't know of any way to flip what you're sending, unless you can put it onto a bitmap first, and then flip that.
Christian
I have several lifelong friends that are New Yorkers but I have always gravitated toward the weirdo's. - Richard Stringer
|
|
|
|
|
I have a large DataTable (67,000 records) and I need to perform an operation on just one column.
As an example, if I wanted to set all characters to upper case, I would consider using something like:
<br />
foreach (System.Data.DataRow row in myDataTable.Rows) <br />
{<br />
string lower = row[ColumnNumber].ToString();<br />
row[ColumnNumber] = lower.ToUpper();<br />
} <br />
Having tested the above code, it takes approx 60mins to update the entire data table on a 1.3ghz PC with 256mb ram.
Is there a more efficient method?
Regards
Wayne Phipps
____________
Time is the greatest teacher... unfortunately, it kills all of its students
LearnVisualStudio.Net
|
|
|
|