|
I have the Google Desktop sidebar. 
Also, I noticed that your script does not enhance the email link, just the reply link. Any reason why you left that out?
"Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weasling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel." - Homer Simpson
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: I noticed that your script does not enhance the email link, just the reply link. Any reason why you left that out?
I rarely use it. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deleting a signature is fine when done from the end, but I have an empty signature in the middle that doesn't go away. Would be nice if sigs were saved across machines too.
"Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weasling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel." - Homer Simpson
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Would be nice if sigs were saved across machines too.
If I recall correctly, that has already passed through Shogs mind. Dunno where it landed though.
--
As Foretold by Nostradamus
|
|
|
|
|
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote: passed through Shogs mind
Well then it needs to be blocked from one end so it can stay in there. 
"Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weasling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel." - Homer Simpson
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
I've toyed with the idea a few times. The problem is, CP only offers online storage for Platinum members, Supporters, and a few other "special" categories. If i used it for storing sigs, it would only work for some users.
I could throw 'em in a "special" message on the users' profile page. But that brings a whole host of other problems with it - most notably, if they actually use that message board, i'd end up having to search through it to find the "special" message. It just screams "flaky".
I could use a different server, but then i have to worry about that going down. Still, this is probably the cleanest solution - especially since Marc already has his Pensieve server set up and available...
Oh, and this is my lazy time of year. "How can he possibly tell!" you ask? Well, i went for about a week with no signatures, just because i was too lazy to click the little arrow and switch away from the empty one. That's lazy, even by my standards...
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to use the IMG tag in CPhog or did Chris disable it after the abuse that one CP user caused? The HTML view displays it in the signature box, but the preview page disables it.
"Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weasling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel." - Homer Simpson
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
<img> has been disabled for a long time (maybe since the beginning?)
What was disabled a few months ago was CSS styles that set background images.
|
|
|
|
|
Both IMG tags and CSS background images are disabled. There's still a way to put images in, but I'd rather not make it known at this point, especially with you-know-who frequenting the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you send me a private message? Pretty please with sugar on top. 
"Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weasling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel." - Homer Simpson
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Well, my concern is not about mentioning it here, but about it being used commonly on the forums (such as in someone's sig), and then being banned because someone picks up on it and misuses it. I want to save it for something special...
I'd like to get Chris to make it so that members who both have been members for a certain length of time without having "bad marks" against their account and have made a certain number of posts are allowed to use the <IMG> tag.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Jörgen's wishlist feature is in (sorta). If you're using the WiP (and you should be!), then get used to clicking on usernames rather than their icons.
Yeah, i'll probably be tweaking this for a while...
|
|
|
|
|
http://svn.csgservices.net/cphog/trunk <- that's the one, right? Nothing happens when I click on usernames...
--
-= Proudly Made on Earth =-
|
|
|
|
|
That's the one. Make sure the post is expanded.
|
|
|
|
|
Do I have to remove the old script and add it again? 
--
Not Y3K Compliant
|
|
|
|
|
Removed it, added it again, restarted FF. No go. 
I do get two of these errors though when I load this forum:
[Exception... "Node was not found" code: "8" nsresult: "0x80530008 (NS_ERROR_DOM_NOT_FOUND_ERR)" location: "http://svn.csgservices.net/cphog/trunk/FreshGrease.js Line: 1253"]
FreshGrease.js (line 1253)
--
Featuring GRATUITOUS ALIEN NUDITY
|
|
|
|
|
Try a hard refresh (Ctrl+F5).
BTW - i see you changed your bio pic...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.. the hard refresh did the trick. Reinstalling the sources ought to have done it though.
Shog9 wrote: BTW - i see you changed your bio pic...
I changed bio pic on last.fm, and I figured I should promote consistency. I also like the timing of that shot.
--
80 percent entertainment by volume
|
|
|
|
|
You said it was work in progress, but here's an issue I spotted right away: it doesn't deal with <pre> tags very well. Check out my post above in which I posted the error message, and click my name. Bump up z-order perhaps?
--
Transmitido en Martian en SAP
|
|
|
|
|
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote: Bump up z-order perhaps?
If you're talking about the table that the syntax highlighter script replaces PRE elements with, no such luck. But, if there's one thing the CP forums have in abundance, it's levels of nested tables, so i can move up a level easily enough...
|
|
|
|
|
 Good job!
|
|
|
|
|
Bravo!
"A real programmer wishes there was a command-line version for every application and then proceeds to write a GUI to wrap around it."
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
|
Since it appears that somewhere our votes are stored I think it would be cool if CPhog or even CP in general didn't average the votes but instead showed something like:
Score: 5.0 (1 vote), 4.0 (3 votes), 3.0 (1 vote) = 4.1 Avg
Or something like that. I'd put this in the suggestion forum but then if Chris didn't want to do it Josh wouldn't see it. I'll put it here and if Chris doesn't see it Josh might and might make it happen.
Why do I even want this feature? Just because it would be interesting to see the distribution of votes.
|
|
|
|
|
That would be cool, especially for poll-style posts. Unfortunately, i don't really have a good way of getting that information, so this'll have to be up to Chris.
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- C hris L osinger, Online Poker Players?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
