|
Fixed. Although Shog has been messing with the CSS...so everything else looks borked. 10901
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah...it was screwed up for me for a bit. CPhog looks...interesting...without all the CSS.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange.. all email notifications for your posts ends with "10901 ". What's up with that?
--
Torn from tomorrow's headlines
|
|
|
|
|
Grrr. That's my fault. I was trying to be clever. Points if you can figure out what it was. 10901
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the HTML code, it looks like you are tagging the message with something... For what purpose, I don't know.
--
LOADING...
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. I was saying that you get points if you figure out what, exactly, that number is.
|
|
|
|
|
Click on the little Bob in the lower-right corner, go to the Intro page...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.. I get it now. MAKEWORD(MAKEBYTE(0, 1), MAKEBYTE(9, 1))
--
Coming Soon to an Illegal DVD
|
|
|
|
|
Something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm about to construct a shog beater if nobody tells me what's going on.
I have a right to know man! I think Jorgen and I were in the original 10 users of this baby when it was Midas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, to be 20 and in college again with nearly limitless free time and energy...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah...limitless free time...
My profs don't agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, I'm using unpacked merely to have some useful information when developing. When the error console tells me that m[i] doesn't have any properties, that doesn't really tell me anything.
|
|
|
|
|
You mentioned that you are refactoring code into a plugin like architecture. When it's done, specs on the interface and possibly and example would be nice. I have a few ideas of my own I'd like to try out.
--
Based on a True Story
|
|
|
|
|
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote: You mentioned that you are refactoring code into a plugin like architecture. When it's done, specs on the interface and possibly and example would be nice. I have a few ideas of my own I'd like to try out.
Will do. The ForumWatch code is actually kinda similar to what I want to do. But yeah...I'll definitely write up some stuff about it.
|
|
|
|
|
You rock David
--
In Hypno-Vision
|
|
|
|
|
Heh. Just trying to have some fun and make this place a little better in the process.
Seriously, I think working with javascript is fun. How sick am I?
|
|
|
|
|
David Stone wrote: How sick am I?
Very! But in a good way.
--
From the Makers of Futurama
|
|
|
|
|
Not a single person has voted high on Shog's post. Well until now that is. C'mon guys show some love for Shog and his cohort Mr. Stone.
This is cool stuff guys. I think the CPhog "beta" is truly a "beta" in the real sense of the word and because you guys do a good job tuning the beta I participate. The way Google tune's a beta... hell why bother.
Nice job on this stuff you guys. Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
code-frog wrote: Not a single person has voted high on Shog's post. Well until now that is. C'mon guys show some love for Shog and his cohort Mr. Stone.
I thought it might be a tad inappropriate to 5-vote a post titled "David, you rock".
code-frog wrote: Nice job on this stuff you guys. Very nice.
We try. In all honesty, most of these features we add are just things I want. I wanted a better editing experience, so I integrated Midas with Josh's original creation. I wanted keyboard shortcuts so I didn't have to move my hands to the mouse. I wanted the ability to watch this forum and the Insider forum. The fact that you guys have your own opinions about them just makes them that much better. This stuff wouldn't be half as cool if we didn't have the feedback we get from you guys. So thanks to all of you for testing the heck out of this stuff and letting both Josh and I know when things could be better.
|
|
|
|
|
What David wrote.
(yes, i'm that lazy )
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: yes, i'm that lazy
I think we both are...as evidenced by the fact that neither of us have signatures...
|
|
|
|
|
True, that.
|
|
|
|