|
Will my application work in a machine where only 2.0 is present?
No
what are the steps i must do in order to make my 1.1 application work
with 2.0?
Use 2.0 to compile the code
My recommendation:
Install the 1.1 framework along side the 2.0 framework. They won't interfere with each other. All 1.1 apps need the 1.1 framework. 2.0 apps will run on the 2.0 framework.
-- modified at 11:33 Thursday 24th May, 2007
topcoderjax - Remember, Google is your friend.
|
|
|
|
|
What if the application uses MFC6 or MFC (compiled and built at VS 2003)? Will I get any errors?
|
|
|
|
|
I assume this is c++, which is something I don't work with. That being the case however, I think the question you've been trying unsucessfully to ask would go something like:
"If I compile a c++ application in VS 2003(1.1 framework) and the application uses MFC6 and MFC but doesn't reference the framework, do I need the 1.1 framework installed on the PC that I deploy the application on?"
Edit the question if necessary and repost it. You might be more likely to get an answer if you post it to the C++/CLI or Visual C++ forum, but I'm not certain what the difference between the two is as I code in C#.
Or you could just try it and find out. Then if you got an error you could deploy the framework.
topcoderjax - Remember, Google is your friend.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET is completely irrelevant to MFC. If you write an MFC app, the MFC library you linked to will need to be present. If you compile a MFC6 app in VS2003, you will need MFC 7.1, because that's how it was built. And again, .NET is irrelevant, unless you wrote managed code also.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
In the control panel applet for Regional and Language Options, under Regional Options, in the Cusomize... dialog, Numbers tab, there is an option for Display Leading Zeros.
In Win32 this is equivalent to the Information Type of LOCALE_ILZERO for the GetLocaleInfo/SetLocalInfo functions.
In dotnet the equivalent class is the System.Globalization.CultureInfo class with its NumberFormat property of type NumberFormatInfo as the class representing numeric cultural information.
Yet I can find no equivalent property in NumberFormatInfo for getting or setting the Display Leading Zeros bool value for decimal numbers
for a given culture.
Was this erroneously left out of the dotnet CultureInfo class structure, or is it someplace else where I have not found it ? If it is someplace else I would appreciate someone pointing it out to me where it is.
Obviously I can call the WIN32 API GetLocaleInfo/SetLocalInfo to get this value for a particular culture, but I would prefer not to and use the dotnet framework if it exists there.
Edward Diener
|
|
|
|
|
does anyone know which program should I use to partitionate a Hard Disk with Microsoft Windows 2003 Server?????
I have already tried it with the partition magic 8.1 but it gives me an error: "Not possible to execute in Windows 2003 .Net server"
The biggest problem is that we mustn't loose the contents of the disk, so the usual ways are not possible. But with the tools "on the fly" that I have, it is not possible.
Any help, advise or tip will be wellcome.
Greetings.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
|
|
|
|
|
Which is the best iterator:
1. For loop
2. For each
3. IEnumerator
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
blumenhause wrote: Which is the best iterator
What is it being used for?
|
|
|
|
|
Does the performance depend on what it is being used for, because I saw some articles here informing that IEnumerator is the slowest. I wanted to know which one is fastest so that I can implement that method here on in my coding(C#).
Regards,
Blumen
|
|
|
|
|
There's a real difference between working which is slowest, and any of them being *slow* in the real world. If IEnumerator is slowest ( and I thought it probably would be ), then choose from the other two, which, as I said, are the same thing. But, don't avoid IEnumerator. Write some code and see if you can spot a speed difference 
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't spot any difference.
|
|
|
|
|
foreach is just a for loop, the compiler inserts the for loop in place of your code. I don't see how any of them are going to have any significant differences.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
I just wanted to know which of those are faster so that I can implement in my coding.
Regards,
Blumen
|
|
|
|
|
Like I said, I doubt any of them are. foreach and a for loop are the *same* thing. Choose based on what suits your needs at the time, speed is never going to be an issue between them
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: foreach is just a for loop, the compiler inserts the for loop in place of your code
You are wrong here. foreach only works on IEnumerable and is using an IEnumerator internally.
Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Really ? OK. I knew it was just syntactic sugar, but apparently I got the details wrong. Thanks for the heads up.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
For You :
For Loop is the best option
Develop2Program & Program2Develop
|
|
|
|
|
How on earth could you possibly say that without knowing anything about the situation it's going to be used in or what the requirements are?
|
|
|
|
|
the assumption that the OP is a clueless noob because he posted without answering any of your questions. 
--
You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
|
The best iterator is the one that gives the most readable code in the context it is used in.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice answer. 
|
|
|
|
|
There is no best iterator.
That's why there is more than one, it all depends on the circumstances
(or your definition of best: performance, readability, susceptibility to
mistakes, ...).
|
|
|
|
|
They are all about the same when using smaller data sets. The only time you will notice differences in speed between the iterators is when you use large data sets. By large data sets I mean in the 100,000 plus data records range. But there are other factors involved here as well such as the operations being done between the iterations.
For best optimization look at the operations being done between the iterations and I'm guessing you will gain more speed over changing your iterator.
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
