|
Hi Guys,
Where can I see the best reference for converting PHP to Classic ASP (VB Code)?
Thanks in advance Guys
hifiger2004
|
|
|
|
|
hifiger2004 wrote: Classic ASP (VB Code)
ASP doesn't use VB code. You can use VBScript or JScript.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
hey Guffa, are you in a bad mood today? Cheer up - you could always go torment string name = "" in the soapbox - thats'w what I do when I need a laugh! I suppose I shouldn't though... I ought to pick on someone with at least half a brain, really...
As for bananas (if you'll excuse the cross-post reference).... I'm sure the EU was supposed to be producing straight ones.... wondered why my walls are all bent...
Sorry hifiger2004 - can't help with any useful advice. Never got into php.
Fred
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, I already started converting the project to classic asp
Thank you Guys
hifiger2004
|
|
|
|
|
Out of curiosity, why would you do such a thing ? Why not ASP.NET ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
I have a table of data in the aspx web page. I am
printing it in landscape paper (11 X 8.5 inches). If
the table has more columns which cannot fit in the
page, then last few columns will not be printed. Is
there any trick or workaround to print all the columns
in IE 6? If it is not possible to fit all the columns
in one page width, then it should print the remaining
columns in another page.
plz any one help me regarding this... 
Pradeep Reddy
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
I currently receive an urgent customer requirement that need to implement the features of RSS in the web.
As i just start to go through the article, i get some idea that RSS is used for the web owner who update frequently especially News site.
Can anyone give some idea how to start the deployment of RSS?
By create the RSS file or from the code behind?
Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
newbie
|
|
|
|
|
Everything you need to know is right here: W3C RSS
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I'm working on a UI that doesn't want to cooperate. ...I figured I'd get a little fancy and I'm running into a little bit of trouble. I'm building an ASP.NET page (C# code behinds) that interfaces with a database table. ...The UI has a javascript "drop down" menu bar up top with a panel(with a couple of input fields and a query button) on the left of the screen, a grid to display the results of the query on the right of the screen, and an "Add" button below the grid. Clicking "Add" hides the grid and displays an "Admin" panel in its place ...blah blah blah. Ok...so there's an issue where the "Query" panel needs to be disabled(yet still visible) while the Admin panel is enabled so I figured I would simply create a div to overlay it and use css opacity to make it 50% opaque grey. ...I know that I ran across an article explaining how to do it but I cannot for the life of me find it with any kind of web search. Does anyone know what I'm talking about? Does anyone know where to find an example of what I'm seeking?
Welcome my son...Welcome..to the Machine
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK. I have tested this in IE 6 & 7 and FireFox and got the same results.
Adding these terms "t2 = 3.43 + 10.00 + 3.33;" produces an incorrect value. Expected value is 16.76, but we get 16.759999999999998. Copy and paste the html code below in notepad and save as an HTML file and run. Oddly, if you swap the first and last terms, you get the expected value. Any thoughts?
<html>
<script>
function Add()
{
var t = 0.0;
var val_1 = document.getElementById('val_1');
var val_2 = document.getElementById('val_2');
var val_3 = document.getElementById('val_3');
var total = document.getElementById('Total');
t = parseFloat(val_1.value) + parseFloat(val_2.value) + parseFloat(val_3.value);
total.value = t;
var t2 = 0;
t2 = 3.43 + 10.00 + 3.33;
//Switching the first and last term produces the correct value
//t2 = 3.33 + 10.00 + 3.43;
//alert(t2);
}
</script>
<input type="text" id="val_1" value="3.43"> +
<input type="text" id="val_2" value="10.00"> +
<input type="text" id="val_3" value="3.33"> = <input type="text" id="Total" value="">
<BR>
<input type="button" id="val_2" value="Add" onclick="Add();">
<BR><BR>
Another Test:
Switch 3.43 and 3.33 ("3.33 + 10.00 + 3.43") values and you get the correct value.
</html>
-- modified at 14:00 Wednesday 30th May, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Pinhead_Me wrote: Oddly, if you swap the first and last terms, you get the expected value. Any thoughts?
Swap the first and third terms. 
|
|
|
|
|
you missed your calling as a comedian.
Thanks for your valuable contribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
floating point calculations are never exact, that's just how it is
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, but why should the order of terms matter? Addition is commutative. That law should apply to the Math engine within Javascript. Right?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably because two of the numbers get added, then the third gets added to the result. So, the order of operations could make a difference to if the rounding error is introduced or not.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: floating point calculations are never exact, that's just how it is
Yes, it is... but it's pretty poor, really.... ok back in Alan Turing's day maybe, but here we are now with microchips that do a billion+ operations a second and still they can't get simple arithmetic right... I mean, if there's one thing computers should be good at, should be the best at, it's number-crunching, right?
Fred
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. That's what prompted me to post this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure - but at what point do you suggest we change how our processors fundamentally work with regard to floating point ? Instead, we have more expensive classes like Decimal which allow us to do more exact calculations, knowing the cost of them is not a big deal, because of how fast our processors are.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Such a discussion wuld soon lead into technical areas about the inner-workings of microschips I am not qualified to comment on - all I can say is that as an end-user it seems astonishing that to this day computers can still struggle with simple arithmetic. It's up to you tecchies to work out how to do it!
|
|
|
|
|
*grin* well, at it's core your PC is a souped up 286. So, the options are to abandon PCs for a new chip set, or live with it.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
I can live with it, but if I told my granny that my computer can't add up the poor woman would die laughing
|
|
|
|
|
Fred_Smith wrote: I mean, if there's one thing computers should be good at, should be the best at, it's number-crunching, right?
There is no problem to get it right, you just have to use the right tool. If you want exact calculations, you simply don't use a data type that does not produce exact results.
If you use the wrong tool, and then complain that it's the fault of the tool that the result isn't right, you are just being foolish. If you want to draw a straight line, you use a ruler. If you choose to use a banana instead, it's not the bananas fault that the result is not a straight line.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
In iexplore 7, ftp directories are shown as list of files (links) and not icons, like in previous versions. How can i force a ftp directory to be shown directly in the windows explorer using frames??
<frameset rows="20%,*">
<frame name="superiord" target="inferiord" scrolling="auto" src="ftp_2.htm">
<frame name="inferiord" src="ftp://localhost/" scrolling="auto">
</frameset>
thanks in advance!!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
