|
Hi all,
I just joined a software solution providing company called, Zone24X7 in Sri Lanka.
I would like to know what is NUnit and hope someone could guide me through this .
Thank you.
RangaSL
|
|
|
|
|
Have you even tried to search the internet for it? If I type it in to a search engine the first hit is for the NUnit Website[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, his question is a bit wordier than that one a while back which just said: "Doubt - What is VB?"
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't know something at your work, it's generally a good idea to let them know, otherwise they will expect that you do.
And, as you've been told in two forums, you won't survive as a developer if you can't use google.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: And, as you've been told in two forums, you won't survive as a developer if you can't use google
Excellent point. Sounds like someone needs to learn how to do a little research 
|
|
|
|
|
NUnit is an open source unit testing framework for Microsoft .NET. It serves the same purpose as JUnit does in the Java world.
Pavan Pareta
|
|
|
|
|
In the visual studio 2005 I find there is two different class are avilable which in build. They are "object" and "Object". One with lower case "o" and other with upper case "O".
I really confused about it. PLz clarify on it.
|
|
|
|
|
All classes in the .NET Framework are derived from Object, every method defined in the Object class is available in all objects in the system.
If you are designing a class, such as a collection, that must handle any type of object, you can create class members that accept instances of the Object class. However, the process of boxing and unboxing a type carries a performance cost. If you know your new class will frequently handle certain value types you can use one of two tactics to minimize the cost of boxing.
One tactic is to create a general method that accepts an Object type, and a set of type-specific method overloads that accept each value type you expect your class to frequently handle. If a type-specific method exists that accepts the calling parameter type, no boxing occurs and the type-specific method is invoked. If there is no method argument that matches the calling parameter type, the parameter is boxed and the general method is invoked. This tactic yields methods that are CLS-compliant.
Regards,
Satips. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
How did any of that explain the difference between "object" and "Object"?
|
|
|
|
|
Nilesh Mitra wrote: In the visual studio 2005 I find there is two different class are avilable which in build. They are "object" and "Object". One with lower case "o" and other with upper case "O".
There is no difference. One is a synonym for the other.
|
|
|
|
|
What Colin said is perfectly correct.. in C#. object is C# built-in type that maps directly to System.Object. They are the same (in C#). I don't know if VB or other languages targeting CLR have built-in type object, so in that sense I would'd say they are the same in general (CLR doesnt know type object), but in C# they are.
See http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ya5y69ds(VS.80).aspx[^]
"Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus
"Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
i've created a console application and i've tried to read some informations in the app.config file
so i've create with VS.NET the app.config file and i've added some tags so it would look like this
<configuration>
<appsettings>
<add key="Ship" value="DocStyle">
<documentconfig>
<configpath>DocumentConfig.config
<documentconfig>
i've tried to read the DocumentConfig section using this code
object config=null;
string Setting = "DocumentConfig";
try
{
config = ConfigurationSettings.GetConfig(Setting);
}
catch(Exception err){
Console.Write(err.Message);
}
but i've alawys got an exception msg "unrecognized configuration Section DocumentConfig "
in fact the use of this section (<documentconfig>) is creating a problem by removing it everthing is OK.
so how can i do to use this section
thanks for help
-- modified at 8:09 Thursday 31st May, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can i use(apply) in Asp.net2.0 window Application "Themes and Skin" Property .
If yes then how to use ?
Ashish
|
|
|
|
|
As standard theres no way to theme Windows Applications. You'll need to find a 3rd party solution that you'll most likly have to pay for.
|
|
|
|
|
Nopes, you can not.
Though there are many skin products in the market, but I would suggest you to write a simple XML based skin class.
Save all the themes for all controls in that xml.
|
|
|
|
|
I am using click once install to pulish my windows application(.Net 2005) to a web site. After I publish the application, all the neccessay files are copied to the webdirectory. Then I pass the published URL to n number of clients. All clients can use the application, but now suppose if I need to fix a bug in one assembly and upload only this assembly to the web directory, it's of no use, as the clients never gets the updated version of the assembly. The application running on the client machine checks whether the newer version of the whole application is available, and in my case I am just uploading one assembly with newer version against the publishing the whole application with the newer version. This works great if I publish the newer version for the application.
Is it possible to make the client application look against the version of the assemblies as against the application?
I tried manipulating the manifest file, but in vain.
Can someone please help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Study, work for it. It will make you a better developer and person.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
chennaidotnetguy wrote: do u have any dumps for mcpd
I studied hard for my certification - I do not want it devalued by some eejit that can't be bothered to study for it!
|
|
|
|
|
People like you are the reason I'd never bother to take a Microsoft exam.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
|
That site is detremental to all those who studied properly for exams.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
