|
Tanx, But
Always i worked with % and it doesn't the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
is it possible to remove the text in the iframe.in iframe i having the text of html tags.i want this page to be cleared
|
|
|
|
|
document.getElementById("<iframeid>").src="about:blank"
OR
document.getElementById("<iframeid>").src=""
Intelligence is measured by common sense not by how many scholarly books you read.
|
|
|
|
|
sir iam getting the iframe text =blank onclicking the button but when i want again the page to loaded in the iframe usind documnet.body.write(source code)i have click the button two times to get the page .how it can be solved
|
|
|
|
|
How to use custom error tag in a web config.by using custom error tag is it possible to dispaly any page when one user requested a page that cannot be accessed by him
|
|
|
|
|
<location path="Xml.aspx">
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="error.html">
<error statusCode="404" redirect="UnauthorizedAccess.aspx"/>
</customErrors>
<authorization>
<allow roles="Admin"/>
<deny users="*"/>
<!--<deny roles="Manager"/>-->
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
I had given the above code .i restrict the page xml.aspx for the other users.if a user logs in with his user name and password and he request the page xml.aspx thn it will be redirected to the login page bcoz of authntication.i dont want like that ,i want if he request the xml.aspx page thn a message will be displayed that "u canot have privilage to access".plz help me.want the source code
|
|
|
|
|
u want like this
<customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="GenericErrorPage.htm">
<error statusCode="500" redirect="ServerErrorPage.htm"/>
<error statusCode="403" redirect="NoAccess.htm"/>
<error statusCode="404" redirect="FileNotFound.htm"/>
</customErrors>
no knowledge in .net
|
|
|
|
|
u can help from this
<configuration>
<system.web>
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms loginUrl="login.aspx" protection="All" timeout="30">
<credentials passwordFormat="Clear">
<user name="devhood" password="password"/>
<user name="someguy" password="password"/>
</credentials>
</forms>
</authentication>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
<location path="admin/">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="devhood" />
<deny users="someguy" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
<location path="usersonly/">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<deny users="?" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
<location path="public/">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
</configuration>
no knowledge in .net
|
|
|
|
|
TextBox1.Attributes["visible1"] = TextBox1.Visible.ToString();
function abc()
{
var a = document.getElementById("ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_TextBox1");
//it is ok so far.problem is in folowing line
alert(a.visible1);
return false;
}
i am not getting the visiblity property of textbox in javascript function.is there any problem?
Soniagupta1@yahoo.co.in
Yahoo Messenger Id = soniagupta1
|
|
|
|
|
Use like this.
document.getElementById('ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_TextBox1');
Devjit Das.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to another day of "I'm useless at my job. I won't buy a book and I won't think for myself."
Sonia Gupta wrote: is there any problem?
Yes - it doesn't work.
Sonia - install Firefox and Firebug, then debug the script. This will tell you what is going on. Seriously, you have to learn how to do this for yourself. You cannot go through life relying on others to do your thinking for you.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Pete, I agree with you............
Parwej Ahamad
g.parwez@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
why parwej why r u against me.let put her query.
Devjit Das.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete not talking about you dear..................
don't worry and keep enjoy:
Parwej Ahamad
g.parwez@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Ok fine. Thanks Parwez.;)
Devjit Das.
|
|
|
|
|
InsDev wrote: why parwej why r u against me
He said nothing against you.
Do you think you are doing Sonia a favour by not teaching her how to solve problems for herself. One of the single most important skills you can have is to be able to think things through and solve them on your own. She has to learn how to do this. The sheer volume of posts that she has made in 6 months shows that she is not willing or able to problem solve. Do her a favour - certainly give her hints, but help her to learn problem solving.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall finding any other user this frustrating. People like MasterSharp, who start asking the basic questions and very obviously take the ball and run with it, make doing this worthwhile. People who obviously can't do their job and just keep asking us to do it, depress me.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: I don't recall finding any other user this frustrating. People like MasterSharp, who start asking the basic questions and very obviously take the ball and run with it, make doing this worthwhile. People who obviously can't do their job and just keep asking us to do it, depress me.
Tell me about it. If it wasn't for the MasterSharps of this world, I'd just give up right now.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: If it wasn't for the MasterSharps of this world
So you tell MasterSharp you will only answer his questions if he answers Sonia's.
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Sonia Gupta wrote: alert(a.visible1);
whats is visible1?
a.style.visibility="hidden";
a.Style.visibility="visible";
bEst rEgard
pAthan
please don't forget to vote on the post that helped you.
|
|
|
|
|
From her original post....
TextBox1.Attributes["visible1"] = TextBox1.Visible.ToString();
She is setting a custom attribute, server side, and wants to read it client side.
I've never done stuff like this and am interested, so I am happily sitting here waiting for Pete to totally lose his cool, hammer the keys really hard, posting a perfect solution just to get rid of this post!;)
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
setting that line server side will result in an attribute being written to the output:
TextBox1.Attributes["myAttribute"] = "foo";
would result in
<textbox id="TextBox1" myAttribute="foo">
if you have a javascript reference to that textbox you can read the attribute back using the .attributes collection in DOM
var myAttributeValue = document.getElementById("TextBox1").attributes["myAttribute"];
I really hope this doesnt answer Sonia Gupta's question, whilst piqueing your curiosity.
|
|
|
|
|
J4amieC wrote: I really hope this doesnt answer Sonia Gupta's question, whilst piqueing your curiosity.
Thanks!
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
"This time yesterday, I still had 24 hours to meet the deadline I've just missed today."
|
|
|
|
|
Except that it won't be called TextBox1 on the client side, of course.
Wouldn't you also need innerText or something to get the value and not the whole attribute ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: Except that it won't be called TextBox1 on the client side, of course.
It might be, assuming its not within an INamingContainer... but you're right chances are it wont be.
Christian Graus wrote: Wouldn't you also need innerText or something to get the value and not the whole attribute ?
No, that JS returns the content of the attribute. erm... i think. Without testing it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
