class factories (simple COM server) - COM Discussion Boards

Re: Implementing IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames

Vi229-Jul-02 2:53

29-Jul-02 2:53

You must implement your version of GetIDsOfNames and correlate it with Invoke. Also you must implement the GetTypeInfoCount and GetTypeInfo to return E_NOTIMPL. And last, you should describe your interface as empty interface, derived from IDispatch.

With best wishes,
Vita

Re: Implementing IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames

Alex Cramer29-Jul-02 17:05

Alex Cramer

29-Jul-02 17:05

Yes, thanks, but can I ask some more about memory management. How to allocate memory in IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames implementation? (hich function is needed?)

Re: Implementing IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames

Vi229-Jul-02 18:19

Vi2

29-Jul-02 18:19

I do not see any problem with memory. GetIDSOfNames does not return any memory pointer. If you want to allocate the internal buffers's memory then you can use any strategy you want.

With best wishes,
Vita

Re: Implementing IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames

Alex Cramer29-Jul-02 18:48

Alex Cramer

29-Jul-02 18:48

Sorry, I thought I must allocate memory for rgDispId. Now all correct!

P.S. Russian programmers answered me for the my last 4 questions. Hm...

Re: Implementing IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames

Vi229-Jul-02 19:05

Vi2

29-Jul-02 19:05

Welcome on www.RSDN.ru, if you can read the Russian text.

With best wishes,
Vita

Re: Implementing IDispatch::GetIDSOfNames

Alex Cramer29-Jul-02 20:34

Alex Cramer

29-Jul-02 20:34

Yeah... My nick is ADK there...

Call Addin's Function From VBA Macro

Anonymous28-Jul-02 21:16

Anonymous

28-Jul-02 21:16

Hello.
Sorry my poor english.
My question is how to Call ComAddin Function from VBA Macro if ComAddin is maked by using MFC C++;
I know how to call ComAddin function from VBA if ComAddin is maked by using VB.

class factories (simple COM server)

Roman Nurik28-Jul-02 19:26

Roman Nurik

28-Jul-02 19:26

is it good practice, or even possible, to have one class factory produce instances of many different COM classes?

i'm trying to make a scripting engine using IActiveScript and such, but i have multiple COM classes implementing IActiveScript, IActiveScriptSite, etc... but I don't want to have a class factory for each one

any thoughts?

- Roman -

Re: class factories (simple COM server)

Vi229-Jul-02 2:42

Vi2

29-Jul-02 2:42

By definition, as the class factory the class object of some class must produce the many instances of that and only that class.

COM standard CoCreateInstance and CoGetClassObject fucntions realize this strategy with IClassFactory interface. But the class object can have another interface by which you can create any other objects as well.

With best wishes,
Vita

Re: class factories (simple COM server)

Roman Nurik29-Jul-02 6:27

Roman Nurik

29-Jul-02 6:27

So I need many factories? i didn't understand the second part of your message, thanks anyway Smile | :)

- Roman -

Re: class factories (simple COM server)

Vi229-Jul-02 19:02

Vi2

29-Jul-02 19:02

A creation of a COM object begins from the creation of the its class object via CoGetClassObject(CLSID,context,NULL,IID_Ix,(void**)&pCoObj) where CocreateInstance uses IID_Ix is equal IID_IClassFactory. So created object is called a class factory object. Then CoCreateInstance uses pCoObj->IClassFactory::CreateInstance(pUnkOuter, IID_Iy, (void**)ppObj) to create a COM object with interface Iy.

Nobody prevents you to use other interface which let you create some COM objects, which may belong to different classes, by calling of some Ix function with some parameter - pCoObj->Ix::FuncCreate(BSTR type, IActiveScript* *ppScript).

Or create alone object M which will be a manager of your objects by previous scheme of a class object.

With best wishes,
Vita

Loadxml error

suresh_sathya28-Jul-02 18:52

suresh_sathya

28-Jul-02 18:52

Hi,
I am having some content in textfile.iam reading the content from file by using API called Read file.I convert this string to bstr using (_bstr_t)string and then i called the method LoadXML(string,bool).But when iam parsing this iam not getting output.
why it is so.

Thanks in advance.

ICUSTOMDOWNLOAD implementation info

Dazza28-Jul-02 2:57

Dazza

28-Jul-02 2:57

Hi,

I'm a newbie here and I was hoping if anyone knew ANYTHING about the ICustomDownload interface. It's a COM interface for allowing control of downloads from Internet Explorer. I think it was introduced for IE v5.5 or something.

I read something about it in MSDN, but I can't seem to find it anymore - plus it didn't show enough info.

You've probably seen programs like GetRight, GoZilla and DAP which I think implement this interface.

Cheers

Dazza

Using Managed Components (.NET) from Unmanaged Code (Delphi)

MrEyes26-Jul-02 5:15

MrEyes

26-Jul-02 5:15

I am currently working on a project to migrate some delphi based com objects to .NET, for reasons that are beyond the scope of this post I am going to be doing this method by method - so I am looking at using managed components from unmanaged code.

As a test project, I create a simple delphi based com object with two methods :

RandMethodA : Returns a random number from 0-100
RandMethodB : Returns a random number from 101-200

The idea is the redirect calls into RandMethodA to a piece of .NET managed code that does exactly the same thing.

Right thats the theory over with, this is the problem I am encountering :

I have created the .NET code and using the "tlbexp" & regasm" tools I have created a TLB file for it, I then added this TLB file to the delphi COM code - when I compile with the new TLB I get alot of compile errors in a file called mscorlib_TLB.pas which seems to be something that is autogenerated when I import the .NET TLB into the project.

eg: (some not all)
[Error] mscorlib_TLB.pas(4984): Illegal type in OLE automation section: 'Byte'
[Error] mscorlib_TLB.pas(4991): Illegal type in OLE automation section: 'Single'
[Error] mscorlib_TLB.pas(4992): Illegal type in OLE automation section: 'Double'
[Error] mscorlib_TLB.pas(10396): Illegal type in OLE automation section: 'Byte'
[Error] mscorlib_TLB.pas(10403): Illegal type in OLE automation section: 'Single'
[Error] mscorlib_TLB.pas(10404): Illegal type in OLE automation section: 'Double'
[Fatal Error] ManagedRandServer_TLB.pas(45): Could not compile used unit 'mscorlib_TLB.pas'

I sincerly hope this makes sense to somebody

Thanks in advance

RANT : Why does my boss give me these "projects" aaarrrggghhh

Client Worker threads

gharrison25-Jul-02 0:36

gharrison

25-Jul-02 0:36

If I have call a COM object in an in-process server, which modifies a pointer, passed to it, in a worker thread as followers.

CoInitialize( NULL );

IProfile Profile;
Profile.CreateDispatch(_T("AutomationDispatch.Profile"));

int Size = Profile.GetDataSize();
double * pData = new double[ Size ];

Profile.GetData( pData );

Every works OK.

But if I call CoInitialize( NULL ) in the main thread before creating the worker thread. Then I get the following run-time error

Heap block at 00148698 modified at 001486A8 past requested size of 8.

When I debug the code, the pointer memory address passed to the COM object is changed in the COM object implementation.

If I pass the address of the pointer to COM object. Then there are no heap errors. I assume this because the address is passed by value.

Re: Client Worker threads

Ernest Laurentin27-Jul-02 12:46

Ernest Laurentin

27-Jul-02 12:46

Since you are planning to pass your COM object to different thread, call CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED);. Your worker thread need to call CoInitialize(NULL) too.

COM,Socket,ASP

eyedia24-Jul-02 21:06

eyedia

24-Jul-02 21:06

:(I have one COM with function Connect(string,integer) which connects to a Socket Server,and property, Status which returns integer.The COM is working fine with VB.But not working with ASP.but it is returning status from the COM.I tried with one more property which returns string.That is also returning perfactly.
My Conclusion is there might be some type conversion problem.Can anyone suggest anything please.And one more problem is the dll remains in use ,if i close the page also.

Big D

Hidden dialog from Dll

Atin Kumar24-Jul-02 18:06

Atin Kumar

24-Jul-02 18:06

Hi,
I am facing a problem.

Following is the description:

I have a COM server(EXE).

It has a method, "ServerMethodAAA". The "ServerMethodAAA" method, calls a Dll function, "DllFuncDlg()". "DllFuncDlg()" function invokes a dialog box.

I have a client app for my COM Server, which loads COM Server in hidden mode.

Problem:

When client calls method, "ServerMethodAAA", the dialog is displayed in hidden mode. That is, behind client application. I want that dialog should appear in fore ground window.

Please suggest me.

Regards.

Re: Hidden dialog from Dll

Ernest Laurentin27-Jul-02 12:48

Ernest Laurentin

27-Jul-02 12:48

Did you try SetForegroundWindow function?

Re: Hidden dialog from Dll

Atin Kumar28-Jul-02 15:35

Atin Kumar

28-Jul-02 15:35

Thanks for your reply.

I have tried doing following in Initdialog

this->EnableWindow(TRUE);
this->ShowWindow(SW_SHOW|SW_SHOWNORMAL);
SetForegroundWindow();
BringWindowToTop();

But, no use.

Regards.

method executing too many times

mgriffith24-Jul-02 8:09

mgriffith

24-Jul-02 8:09

i just asked this on the visual c++ forum, but i think this is probably a better place to ask....here goes nothing

i have 2 methods that are using IWebBrowser2 to execute a print method from a com object that is hosted on a webpage. here is the code for the methods:

---------------------------------

STDMETHODIMP CTemplatePrinter::IEPrintNoPrompt(VARIANT varTemplateURL)
{
CComPtr<iolecontainer> spContainer;
CComPtr<iserviceprovider> spSP;
CComPtr<iwebbrowser2> spWB;
CComPtr<idispatch> spDisp;
CComPtr<ihtmldocument2> spDoc;
CComPtr<iolecommandtarget> spCT;
CComVariant vPTPath = varTemplateURL;

m_spClientSite->GetContainer(&spContainer);
spContainer->QueryInterface(IID_IServiceProvider, (void**)&spSP);
spSP->QueryService(SID_SWebBrowserApp, IID_IWebBrowser, (void**)&spWB);
spWB->get_Document(&spDisp);
spDisp->QueryInterface(IID_IHTMLDocument2, (void**)&spDoc);
spDoc->QueryInterface(IID_IOleCommandTarget, (void**)&spCT);

// ******* THIS IS WHERE IT'S GOING CRAZY!!!! ******* //
spCT->Exec(&CGID_MSHTML, IDM_PRINT, OLECMDEXECOPT_DONTPROMPTUSER, &vPTPath, NULL);

return S_OK;
}

---------------------------------------

STDMETHODIMP CTemplatePrinter::IEPrint(VARIANT varTemplateURL)
{
CComPtr<iolecontainer> spContainer;
CComPtr<iserviceprovider> spSP;
CComPtr<iwebbrowser2> spWB;
CComPtr<idispatch> spDisp;
CComPtr<ihtmldocument2> spDoc;
CComPtr<iolecommandtarget> spCT;
CComVariant vPTPath = varTemplateURL;

m_spClientSite->GetContainer(&spContainer);
spContainer->QueryInterface(IID_IServiceProvider, (void**)&spSP);
spSP->QueryService(SID_SWebBrowserApp, IID_IWebBrowser, (void**)&spWB);
spWB->get_Document(&spDisp);
spDisp->QueryInterface(IID_IHTMLDocument2, (void**)&spDoc);
spDoc->QueryInterface(IID_IOleCommandTarget, (void**)&spCT);

// ***** IT CALLS THIS 2 TIMES? ******** //
spCT->Exec(&CGID_MSHTML, IDM_PRINT, OLECMDEXECOPT_PROMPTUSER, &vPTPath, NULL);

return S_OK;
}
--------------------------

my question is: does anyone have any idea why the IOleCommandTarget::Exec method it going berzerk? when i call the method from a script, the first one keeps spooling pages into the printer, and the second one opens 2 print dialogs in a row...i also have another function for opening a print preview window that works fine....the only difference is my call to Exec is as follows:
spCT->Exec(&CGID_MSHTML, IDM_PRINTPREVIEW, OLECMDEXECOPT_PROMPTUSER, &vPTPath, NULL);

i've tried all that i can see...if i replace spCT->Exec(...) with
spWB->ExecWB(OLECMD_PRINT, OLECMDEXECOPY_PROMPTUSER, &vPTPath, NULL);
it still does the same thing...i've even tryied without passing in the &vPTPath (printing template path) argument

i also know that the method is only getting called once...i tested this by also using spDoc to write some stuff out to pop up a message box every time it got called, and the message box only came up once, but the printing kept going...

any suggestions?
Confused | :confused:

michael griffith
--------------------
mgriffith@lauren.com
mdg12@po.cwru.edu

Safearray with byte data

Anonymous24-Jul-02 4:09

Anonymous

24-Jul-02 4:09

I want to pass byte data from VB into a VC++ COM.

In a setData(VARIANT msgdata), I write the code below, but it has error in pdata[i] = *padata[i]. What's wrong ?

<br />
	if ((msgdata.vt & VT_ARRAY) == 0)<br />
		return E_INVALIDARG;<br />
	if ((msgdata.vt & VT_UI1) == 0)<br />
		return E_INVALIDARG;<br />
<br />
	SAFEARRAY *psa = msgdata.parray;<br />
	PBYTE *padata;<br />
<br />
	SafeArrayAccessData(psa, (void **) &padata);<br />
<br />
	//only one directly, no of element is the data length<br />
	int nsize = psa->rgsabound->cElements;<br />
	PBYTE pdata = new BYTE[nsize];<br />
	for (int i=0; i< nsize; i++)<br />
	{<br />
		pdata[i] = *padata[i];<br />
	}<br />
<br />
	SafeArrayUnaccessData(psa);<br />

In VB, I'm doing some testing code like:

<br />
        Dim ba(2) As Byte<br />
<br />
        ba(0) = 5<br />
        ba(1) = 7<br />
        ba(2) = 19<br />
<br />
        compSSM.setData(ba)<br />

Re: Safearray with byte data

Vi224-Jul-02 4:20

Vi2

24-Jul-02 4:20

I think that you do not need the dereference of pointer. In padata you will have a pointer to some BYTE values after SafeArrayAccessData().

BYTE *padata;
SafeArrayAccessData(psa, (void **) &padata);
//only one directly, no of element is the data length
int nsize = psa->rgsabound->cElements;
PBYTE pdata = new BYTE[nsize];
for (int i=0; i< nsize; i++)
{
pdata[i] = padata[i];
}
or yet
memcpy( pdata, padata, nsize*sizeof(BYTE) );

With best wishes,
Vita

Re: Safearray with byte data

Anonymous24-Jul-02 5:53

Anonymous

24-Jul-02 5:53

Thanks, it's working now. Even I don't have the loop to copy the array. I can use it directly within the block SafeArrayAccessData() and SafeArrayUnaccessData().

Passing COM object as parameter to C++ function

Tomaž Štih24-Jul-02 0:23

Tomaž Štih

24-Jul-02 0:23

I am back to C++ at least for one project and need a quick solution to this problem:
I have a MathLib component, written in ATL, with two COM classes: MathLib.Matrix and MathLib.Vector. For those of you who have no background in math, vector is an array and matrix is 2 dimensional array (i.e. int a[3][3] is a matrix whereas int b[3] is a vector). I only encapsulated functionality to objects because I am going to use these two classes from SQL server and it does not support COM & arrays very well.

Now I would like to perform some quantitative analysis (mathematical operations) on these two classes.
Suppose I have MathLib.Fn COM class. This COM class has function that adds the contents of two arrays and returns array of sums.

For example, I have
[1 2 3] + [4 5 6] = [5 7 9]
(because 1+4=5, 2+5=7, 3+6=9)

My function name is AddVectors, it takes two vector object as input parameters and return vector object as output. This function is in the same C++ dll as the two other ATL classes.

Now I need to know what is the easiest way to declare this function? Don't forget that the Vector and Matrix object will most likely be generated by SQL server transact SQL and only then passed, so I'll be dealing with late binding.

Basically, this is how they'll be used:

SQL SERVER
m=create object mathlib.matrix <--- will probably create IDispatch *
populate m with some values
fn=create object mathlib.fn
n=new matrix
n=fn.execute_some_function(m) <--- will pass object to my COM object

And the second question is how to use these pointers in the function, do I need any marshalling? Anyone has sample of such code?

Kind Regards,
Tomaz

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.