|
Hi I’m developing an internet ASP.NET application, which needs to interact with Microsoft Certification Authority Server, the
client (browser) will request a certificate to sign a file (word, pdf) later.
I'm really disoriented. Must I use CAPICOM? Signing in the server, and sending the certificate through an SSL connection? Is
there any class in the .Net Framework to interact with Certification Authority Service without CAPICOM or an external Api?
Where can i get a code example?
Regards
Sergio
|
|
|
|
|
Don't cross post. Read the forum rules.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
I've been using a COM component for audio recording/editing in my forms application. Now since it does not work on Vista I must find a replacement.
Can anyone here hint me of a component, COM or pure managed code that fulfils the following needs:
* Recording direct to disc to wav-files
* Converting to/from Wav and OGG
* Audio editor for editing the sound file
* Plying sound in OGG and Wav files.
The component I’ve been using is from NCTsoft (www.nctsoft.com - > the link almost dead  )
Thankful for any hints
/S
|
|
|
|
|
i need help with a quick program i am making, how would i exit a block of code in an if statement for example
<br />
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)<br />
{<br />
code to be run here<br />
if (x ==5)<br />
{<br />
run more code<br />
exit this block<br />
}<br />
more code here<br />
}<br />
this is hard to explain but there is no other way i can think of doing this i know in visual basic there was something called exit sub (or something similiar been a while) that would leave it
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
xxmikexx wrote: this is hard to explain but there is no other way i can think of doing this i know in visual basic there was something
look at the C# language documentation for break and return however I strongly suggest you get a beginners book on C# or stick to Visual Basically Garbage.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
ok thanks alot it is just for the class i am in currently we have to learn a language of our choice i just needed this bit for the chapter i was working on
|
|
|
|
|
I shake my head in dismay and sadness, then realize that at least some of us will have job security for a long time to come from the sounds of it.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
also i shake my head that there are aggorant people like you out there you didnt have to help me out and there was no need for that i am just trying to learn and not fail... i have a deadline... but i thank the first guy for the help
|
|
|
|
|
xxmikexx wrote: i am just trying to learn and not fail... i have a deadline
What did you do with the rest of the semester then?
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
i have been learning and our semester just started...
|
|
|
|
|
xxmikexx wrote: i have been learning
I guess you are not a quick learner. You must be the first one.
what happens if you get better at programming, you add more x's to your name?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
guess not i am damn sure you didnt learn how to program for yourself in 3 days i have spent alot of time trying to find websites were i can learn that are not blocked this is a new thing i can not do and all i know is i am definetly not coming back here for help any more a few people on here are very helpfull but just a couple people are incredibly annoying, i dont see what i did wrong i tried looking it up for my self then i figured i would ask for help and the reason i have the X's in my name is because i hate numbers in my name also this is the same name i have had on all the websites i go to one user name thats it so....
modified on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Wow you really got him fired up. I almost suffocated trying to read his post to me without taking a breath.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
... do you have a problem reading in your head?
|
|
|
|
|
Guess he is struggling in his writing courses also. Punctuation is overrated anyway. 
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nischalke wrote: Punctuation is overrated anyway.
So is... oh never mind I don't have time to do the rest of that thought justice. ![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) It's beer thirty, CYA!
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
y are you such a douchebag?(Mark Nischalke) honestly why do people like you even exist
|
|
|
|
|
The equivalent to exit sub in C# is return, as in return to the books and learn the language before trying to write programs with it.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
i would by choice but for class i have to make programs as i go along...
but thanks for the help saved bundles of time
|
|
|
|
|
Return is not allowed inside of methods more than once and should not be used by any method that does not have a functional result. Doing so is a poor programming practice that violates the one-in, one-out principle. You should use a proper combination of if, elseif, and else blocks to properly ensure program flow execution.
(When I was a TA I took points off for liberal use of return)
Need a C# Consultant? I'm available.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway
|
|
|
|
|
ok thanks but the reason i need it is if the first block of if statements is executed it will also execute the rest i want each one to trigger at a different time, i am making a program were you click a spot on the screen and it sends waves out i have it working but it just does it really quick if i use this it will wok for sure thanks for the advice tho
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: Return is not allowed
Not allowed, or not recommended? Two different things. I don't know of any language that places a restriction on the number of return statements that can be used in a block of code. However, yes, good design principles dictate that you should have as few exit points as possible.
The original question only asked what the equivalent of VB's exit sub was, not how it should be used. Both Mike and I answered that direct question. Saying "Don't listen to anyone else" is a bit over the top.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone with the experience and judgment to disregard my statement would do so. Telling a novice not to do it is perfectly inline. A lot of the advice I give is structured to introductory programmers as more experienced developers have the experience to know when it is hogwash. By biasing my response towards less experienced developers I increase the value of the statements. I will repeat my statement with the inferred subtext:
"Return is not allowed unless you have the experience and judgment to properly identify cases for its use and understand the consequences both positive and negative"
Need a C# Consultant? I'm available.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: Return is not allowed inside of methods more than once
This isn't true. The C# language specification allows methods to contain multiple return statements.
The question to ask is whether a method should contain multiple return statements. The Microsoft Code Complete book makes some good arguments for and against this practice. There are definitely cases when multiple return statements make for greater readability and reduced complexity.
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: Return is not allowed inside of methods more than once and should not be used by any method that does not have a functional result. Doing so is a poor programming practice that violates the one-in, one-out principle.
Yeah, that's what I thought also until I read Implementation Patterns by Kent Beck:
Back in the old days of programming, a commandment was issued: each routine shall have a single entry and a single exit. This was to prevent the confusion possible when jumping into and out of many locations in the same routine. It made good sense when applied to FORTRAN or assembly language programs written with lots of global data where even understanding which statements were executed was hard work. In Java, with small methods and mostly local data, it is needlessly conservative. However, this bit of programming folklore, thoughtlessly obeyed, prevents the use of guard clauses.
Guard clauses are particularly useful when there are multiple conditions:
[Code example snipped of nested if statements with a single return]
Nested conditionals breed defects. The guard clause version of the same code notes the prerequisites to processing a request without complex control structures:
[Code example snipped of flat if statements each with a return ]
Keep in mind there is more context to his segment on the Guard Clause. If you are interested I highly recommend the book.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer - German philosopher (1788 - 1860)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
