|
I'm getting
"
-- Unable to load messages due to high load or server error. Please try again --
"
again when I try to access the Lounge and C#.
|
|
|
|
|
What time (and timezone) did you get that message?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It started yesterday evening Arizona time (UTC-7:00). Same as last week.
It's working again now.
|
|
|
|
|
I was getting the "high load" message most of the day yesterday (and Monday, too). But yesterday was the worst. I couldn't retrieve more than a dozen-or-so message over a 6-8 hour period starting from about 9am.
I am in the US Eastern Timezone.
|
|
|
|
|
This sounds like a single server was playing up. I was on the site all day and never once saw an issue. WE've been talking aobut some of our older servers and may simply pull some of them from production.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
First the good news: I didn't get the
"
-- Unable to load messages due to high load or server error. Please try again --
"
message in the Lounge and C# this week.
Now the bad news: Instead I'm getting it with some article messages. Since Tuesday evening (UTC-7:00) and still having it now.
|
|
|
|
|
I have Dmitry crafting a new, hampster sized whip that should get things moving soon
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Check out this messages/profile page:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Messages.aspx?fmid=2415307[^]
All of a sudden, the novice user has changed his username to bright bold red. Is there a plan to control the HTML in Usernames at least till Silver?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts... --William Shakespeare
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately this has already bitten another CPian. I think this should be fixed immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
This member is Silver.
I'll work on filtering out some more bad HTML
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Save yourself some work and just strip it all from member's names.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: Save yourself some work and just strip it all from member's names
I agree.
Jon
Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree. I'd rather continue working to allow members some latitude while preventing abuse.
I hate 'lowest common denominator' solutions.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'd rather continue working to allow members some latitude while preventing abuse.
I am truly impressed by your commitment to your vision of the site. And it's obvious that your vision is successful.
Jon
Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
|
|
|
|
|
Is it currently possible to go through the ASW but instead of posting the article, put it on hold, so it doesn't get displayed publicly, and you can go back and finish it later?
|
|
|
|
|
Something like Drafts right? I believe this was suggested a way back but may be currently on works.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts... --William Shakespeare
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Something like Drafts right?
Yeah, that's exactly what I mean. Thanks, I couldn't think of the proper name for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Not yet - but it's on the list. Sorry for taking so long to implement but we're juggling a lot at the moment!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
okay who do i send the check to for silver status.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"When I first saw it, I just thought that you really, really enjoyed programming in java." - Leslie Sanford
|
|
|
|
|
yay! apparently no check is required
i guess i should thank the CP gods.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"When I first saw it, I just thought that you really, really enjoyed programming in java." - Leslie Sanford
|
|
|
|
|
Often articles in the needing approval queue have very poor o no explanation at all, their content is merely the attached code (the latter maybe actually interesting).
I think the authors are missing the target and I wonder what is the best way to let them know about.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
If you type a message at the bottom the author usually reads them and may/may not comment.
|
|
|
|
|
You're right, of course. Anyway, since it happens so often and, IMHO, is against article guidelines I was looking for a more general approach.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Personally for the users who basically use an "article" for a "test" or can't be bothered to fix the template sections the general approach should be to hunt them down and kick them where it hurts. But that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
I know you're draconian.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|