|
Interesting idea...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to use some workaround for this, like My Blog, but I don't want to make my list public, also I cannot edit the list, I have to post again an updated list.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
For the last couple of hours, forum page loads seem to happen in a different way.
First the headers and the leftside menus appear, together with a big orange panel, ready to show
the messages. Then all, or first some then all, expected messages appear.
Not sure I like all this flashing stuff, especially the abundance of the CP orange color (which
is quite OK in small doses).
[ADDED]
example from Lounge, where it is most prominent:
http://www.perceler.com/temp/lounge1.jpg[^]
http://www.perceler.com/temp/lounge2.jpg[^]
http://www.perceler.com/temp/lounge3.jpg[^]
[/ADDED]
modified on Friday, July 18, 2008 7:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Dial-up will always be horrible and it is only when you upgrade to a faster internet when you don't have to worry about this. Unfortunately I have dial-up, however, I don't seem to see a problem with the coloring as it loads.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my homepage Oracle Studios
Discounted or Free Software for Students:
DreamSpark - downloads.channel8.msdn.com
MSDN Academic Alliance - www.msdnaa.com
|
|
|
|
|
Chris' message below suggests you are not using FireFox then?
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
This will happen if your connection is very slow, the servers are having a bad day and/or you're using Firefox. When Firefox renders only part of the page it fills in the gaps as best it can until it gets more info.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I am using FF most of the time, my connection is fine (ADSL), so lets blame your servers.
If it happens again, I will try IE.
Regards,
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to be able to post to the CodeProject forums from either my home system or my company workstation. In order to receive notification of responses regardless of which computer I post from, I would need both email addresses registered with the forum. I realize this would add some overhead for you guys to deal with, but it doesn't seem like it would be appreciable.
How about it?
|
|
|
|
|
This would be messy. So many users find it hard enough managing a single email address that adding multiple emails that members would lose, would become inactive, would change etc would just cause us headaches.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: This would be messy.
I agree. That is why I have my email address for CP tied to my blackberry 
When there are truckloads of replies coming in, my blackberry makes me sound very important/busy 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
you could set up a free web-based email account devoted to CP, and either check that regularly,
or have it forward everything to both your regular email addresses. Or use an iPhone, a BlackBerry, ...
|
|
|
|
|
in the messages Boards, not including the conversation forms, as people answer the questsions, the original message should lower itself in priority and sort onto the other pages.
for example
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
A1
A2
Then an answer for Q2 comes in... and the form would look like the following:
Q1
Q3
Q2
A3
Q4
A1
A2
This way the unanswered Items would remain on the first pages, so they would recive more attention.
~Jason
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
- Dave Barry
|
|
|
|
|
That's not a very good idea. Sometimes a question is ignored just because it makes no sense or it's obviously somebody trolling - why should these questions remain at the top ad-nauseam. Each forum has a link to show unanswered questions, so you could always use this.
|
|
|
|
|
Then we should vote them away... no?
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
- Dave Barry
|
|
|
|
|
Jason McBurney wrote: Then we should vote them away... no?
No. The ones that get voted away are abuse messages. You can 1 vote them, but they won't be got rid of.
|
|
|
|
|
Unanswered can also mean "bad question". We don't want the front pages to be littered with flotsam and jetsam
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Totally agree, however, isn't that why we vote on messages. An additional bussinss logic rule could be that messages with a 3 or less, are downgraded in priority.
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
- Dave Barry
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want things to move around by themselves.
I hate it when menus do that, when the notification area does it, when the desktop icons do it.
Things should remain where they were.
Anyway, after a short while, in your suggestion, either the first page would be filled with crappy
questions without answers, and/or people would start adding crappy replies to get rid of unanswered
questions... Please just let it fade away the way it works right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't your post move now, with new ones being added at the top of the forum?
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
- Dave Barry
|
|
|
|
|
I can have my browser scroll and move to the next/previous page, the messages I have read remain
in order though, so I will always recognize what I have seen before at a glance. And that is
what I insist on having, always and everywhere.
If in your proposal you have been reading messages on one page for say 5 minutes, and then ask for
the next page, what will you say when some, an indeterminate number of, messages, are from
the ones you just read, and those are not necessarily at the top of the new page, but all over
the place?
no thanks.
BTW: you are aware there is a "view unanswered questions button" on top of the pages?
|
|
|
|
|
While I agree with all of you comments, they all have a simliarity of assuming unasnswerd questions are bad. Is that true?
What about good questions that just don't get attention?
You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.
- Dave Barry
|
|
|
|
|
Jason McBurney wrote: assuming unasnswerd questions are bad. Is that true?
No, they aren't making that assumption at all. There are actually multiple issues here.
1. Posts should always be displayed in the same order, regardless of how many answers a post has.
2. Posts may be unanswered for several reasons:
a. The post is just junk and no one wants to give it any more attention.
b. The post doesn't make sense.
c. The post simply got missed.
3. In your proposal, not only would posts jump around based on the number of answers, but all posts without an answer would always be on the first page.
If the desire is to quickly see all of the posts with no answers, there is a "View unanswered questions" option for each forum which does exactly that. Yes, it requires an explicit choice by the reader but it keeps the flow of the forums consistent and moving forward with older posts falling to later pages as new ones are added.
Scott Dorman Microsoft® MVP - Visual C# | MCPD
President - Tampa Bay IASA
[ Blog][ Articles][ Forum Guidelines]
Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
|
|
|
|
|
chris & co.
On my dev machine I got script error "missing ')' ". I fired the debugger and behold noticed a missing ')' on the two functions ConfirmDelete() and ConfirmModify() in /script/forums/list.aspx
no harms, just annoying when running with script debugging turned on. 
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, thanks, fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Great, thanks, I wish my bank takes quick action like CP. I get tonnes of script errors.
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
