|
There are some extra comments in my last post
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
As we keep running across the same questions all the time, some of them quite valid but repeated continuously as new people come on board I would like to see standard searches. This not a FAQ which I don't think will ever be used but a set of pre formatted article searches.
It could be DDL, live up near the existing search and would need to be filtered by the current forum.
Get the people who answer the question to devise the searches and have them submitted to the hamsters for inclusion in the DDL. Hopefully this would give you a limited number of good searches from a limited number of skilled answerers.
I would also like to be able to paste a standard search into a reply without having to go look for it (with a humorous/cutting remark directing the asker to the article search facility).
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting idea. I've got something close (kinda) I'll be rolling out soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hah - cool Please search this that and the other before posting, I like it, colour is a little subdued, flashing magenta MAY get their attention!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much in all the forums, the View unanswered questions in the ..... forum seems to pull up questions/posts that have a reply, is this something that is going to be looked into?
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
We're on it
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Lately I am getting error like the following when replying to a post
Error: Transaction (Process ID 247) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.. Ticket:
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
Two many users, not enough hampsters.
Next week will bring a big change.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Two
You mean too 
Chris Maunder wrote: not enough hampsters.
Well, run down to the pet store and get some more 
Chris Maunder wrote: Next week will bring a big change.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, yeah. It's past pumpkin hour so I can be excused 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
 Ok, you're excused
OT: Here is an interesting thing I noticed. I posted a bunch of messages in the LAMP portion of CP, when I went back to the regular CP, my profile didn't show the LAMP messages in my recently posted messages. When I go into my profile on the LAMP page, everything is there. On both LAMP and the regular CP member profile, the counts are correct. Not sure what is going on but figured I'd let you know.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Take a look at this member[^]. I think there is a problem with the number of messages he posted  .
|
|
|
|
|
Look at his biography:
I like to find security bugs in different applications
|
|
|
|
|
It seems he only posted 6 messages. Deal of the week post 6 messages and get 1,000,000 free 
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
Soroush has been helping me with a couple of things which has involved a little messing about with settings.
We can't do anything without you guys spotting it! 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We can't do anything without you guys spotting it!
Just trying to keep you on your toes. Remember, Big Brother is always watching. 
Scott Dorman Microsoft® MVP - Visual C# | MCPD
President - Tampa Bay IASA
[ Blog][ Articles][ Forum Guidelines]
Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
|
|
|
|
|
"we've always been at war with Eastasia."
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We can't do anything without you guys spotting it!
Hehehe
Otherwise your job would be too easy you know
|
|
|
|
|
If you want technically clueless lusers you could close this site down and start BeanieBabyCollectorProject. 
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
If anyone clicks on Report Article for an article needing approval, shouldn't that prevent it from being publicly displayed until an editor looks at it? I thought the purpose of the article approval process was to keep junk articles out of public view and off the front page.
I reported this article [http://www.codeproject.com/KB/list/Extended_List_Control.aspx[^]] and now it's on the front page, 1.11 rating and all.
|
|
|
|
|
Article Reporting merely puts an article in a queue for us to look at. 99% of the entries in this queue are bogus so we're not going to remove an article just because someone sends an article report that contains a "HEPL ME PLZZ!!" message for their homework assignment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 99% of the entries in this queue are bogus
I believe it's true for articles that are publicly available, so everybody can hit report button including complete idiots who do the stuff you described. But those articles which wait for approval can be viewed only by gold+ members. So I guess that the rate of bogus reports are significantly lower for those articles.
|
|
|
|
|
You are right of course, there is something fundamentally wrong in the approval scheme:
it is intended to keep bad articles out, but the only tool we get is a button to
approve an article, since votes are irrelevant (there have been several threads
about ignoring them, resetting them, and what have you) and reporting just queues something.
There is nothing to effectively indicate disapproval.
That is like telling you "try and avoid the rain", while handing you sun glasses.
On the positive side, the situation has been worse, when there was no approval
step at all.
|
|
|
|
|
when you click on "Lounge" link. But it loads in 3-4 seconds when you click on one of the Lounge posts on the main page.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
