Re: How can Create new rect with width? - C / C++ / MFC Discussion Boards

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

Le@rner2-Jan-09 20:47

Le@rner

2-Jan-09 20:47

Hamid. wrote:
CRect::DeflateRect.

but this use for Decreases the width and height of CRect.

IN A DAY, WHEN YOU DON'T COME ACROSS ANY PROBLEMS - YOU CAN BE SURE THAT YOU ARE TRAVELLING IN A WRONG PATH

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

Hamid_RT3-Jan-09 0:16

Hamid_RT

3-Jan-09 0:16

You can decrease your width of current width with this function.

Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

CPallini2-Jan-09 20:50

CPallini

2-Jan-09 20:50

rect.InflateRect(0,0,70,0);

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

[My articles]

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

Le@rner2-Jan-09 20:55

Le@rner

2-Jan-09 20:55

please explain why this.

IN A DAY, WHEN YOU DON'T COME ACROSS ANY PROBLEMS - YOU CAN BE SURE THAT YOU ARE TRAVELLING IN A WRONG PATH

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

CPallini2-Jan-09 21:04

CPallini

2-Jan-09 21:04

Your original rect (10,20,20,40) has

width = right - left = 20 - 10 = 10 pixels.

If you want it 80 pixels wide (with minimum change on coordinates) then you should move its right side 70 pixels to the right:

left<sub>new</sub>   = left;
right<sub>new</sub>  = right + 70; // now width = right<sub>new</sub> - left<sub>new</sub> = 80
top<sub>new</sub>    = top;
bottom<sub>new</sub> = bottom;

That's what InflateRect(0,0,70,0) does.
Smile | :)

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

Le@rner2-Jan-09 21:16

Le@rner

2-Jan-09 21:16

thanks ,
if new width is decrease so i can use DeflateRect or InflateRect.

IN A DAY, WHEN YOU DON'T COME ACROSS ANY PROBLEMS - YOU CAN BE SURE THAT YOU ARE TRAVELLING IN A WRONG PATH

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

CPallini3-Jan-09 2:49

CPallini

3-Jan-09 2:49

You may also use inflate with negative values.
Smile | :)

Re: How can Create new rect with width?

Michael Dunn3-Jan-09 18:41

Michael Dunn

3-Jan-09 18:41

Juat assign a new value to the right member:

rect.right = rect.left + the_new_width;

--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP Cool | :cool:

LINKS~! CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ

I work for Keyser Söze

Releasing memory occupied by controls

VCProgrammer2-Jan-09 19:06

VCProgrammer

2-Jan-09 19:06

Hi all,

I have made a Dialog box in vc2008 and have made several control on it....

at end i want to release memory occupied by all the controls...

How can i do this??

Thanks in advance

Re: Releasing memory occupied by controls [modified]

Le@rner2-Jan-09 19:33

Le@rner

2-Jan-09 19:33

Check this article.

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=1647&msg=2689443[^]

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Search.aspx?fid=0&kw=Releasing+memory&sf_fi=1647&sf_sw=2&pgnum=1[^]

IN A DAY, WHEN YOU DON'T COME ACROSS ANY PROBLEMS - YOU CAN BE SURE THAT YOU ARE TRAVELLING IN A WRONG PATH

modified on Saturday, January 3, 2009 1:39 AM

Re: Releasing memory occupied by controls

Hamid_RT2-Jan-09 19:55

Hamid_RT

2-Jan-09 19:55

How did you make them?

Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )

Re: Releasing memory occupied by controls

Randor 3-Jan-09 0:34

Randor

3-Jan-09 0:34

Although your instincts may tell you otherwise, this is not how memory management[^] works. Your application has an internel working set[^] of memory. The operating system uses this extra memory to make your application faster since the memory is already allocated but simply marked as "stand-by". When you free your memory it does not mean your working set will decrease in size. The memory is simply marked as "not needed now, but maybe later" or "standby". I hope this makes sense.

It is possible to force all standby memory to be released by calling the SetProcessWorkingSetSize Function[^] with -1 for both arguments although its not recommended. It required the PROCESS_SET_QUOTA access right. You can severly harm application performance by abusing SetProcessWorkingSetSize. Note that this technique is not recommended for most applications.

Best Wishes,
-David Delaune

Need help for coloring the CTabCtrl white

Rahul Vaishnav2-Jan-09 18:17

Rahul Vaishnav

2-Jan-09 18:17

Hi all,

I need help for coloring the CTabCtrl Window to white in MFC.

Actually I have a Tab control having Two tabs,I have not added Property pages, just put some controls like Edit box and Radio buttons on Tab control and on click of Each tab I am just hiding and showing some controls.
I want to make Tab control color white..
Please give me some sample code or some link for help..

Thanks in advance

Re: Need help for coloring the CTabCtrl white

Hamid_RT2-Jan-09 19:58

Hamid_RT

2-Jan-09 19:58

Is Ownerdraw Tab Controls - Borders and All[^] helpful?

Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )

virtual operator "="

wubousc2-Jan-09 13:21

wubousc

2-Jan-09 13:21

Hi,

I wonder why a derived class can not use its base class's virtual operator = function. For example, code like this can not pass compilation:

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

class base
{
public:

virtual base & operator = (const base &other) {}

};

class derived : public base
{

};

int main()
{
derived d;
base b;

d = b; //compiler says no operator = found

return 0;
}

thanks,
Bob

Re: virtual operator "="

Bram van Kampen2-Jan-09 14:56

Bram van Kampen

2-Jan-09 14:56

Just a Casting Problem

Try Again As Follows:

(base)d = b;

Regards,

Smile | :)

Bram van Kampen

Re: virtual operator "="

wubousc2-Jan-09 15:46

wubousc

2-Jan-09 15:46

yes, typecast works. But what I mean is why derived can not directly use "=" if it inherits it from base?

thanks,
Bob

Re: virtual operator "="

Mark Salsbery2-Jan-09 16:55

Mark Salsbery

2-Jan-09 16:55

The assignment operator used is chosen based on the
type of the variable being assigned to. To use the base
assignment operator without a cast would require an overload
that returns a derived.

Mark

Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
Java | [Coffee]

Re: virtual operator "="

wubousc2-Jan-09 17:03

wubousc

2-Jan-09 17:03

Is it in the specification of C++? If not, what I can see is the derived class inherits all of the information of the function in the bass class, including the return value.

thanks,
Bob

Re: virtual operator "="

Mark Salsbery2-Jan-09 17:19

Mark Salsbery

2-Jan-09 17:19

It wouldn't work for any class, whether virtual or not.

There's not an implicit assignment operator for a type that takes a
base type as its right-hand operand. You must explicitly provide the
assignment operator or cast the left operand to a type that matches
an existing assignment operator overload.

Using a cast may hide the compiler error but if the operator overload that
the compiler chooses to call doesn't actually return a derived&, then you can't
rely on it being a derived object.

Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
Java | [Coffee]

Re: virtual operator "="

Mark Salsbery2-Jan-09 17:24

Mark Salsbery

2-Jan-09 17:24

Also..

It is stated here[^] that assignment operators are not inherited.

Take a close look at this[^] example as well.

Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
Java | [Coffee]

Re: virtual operator "="

wubousc2-Jan-09 17:58

wubousc

2-Jan-09 17:58

Thank you so much. Now I am clear.

Bob

Re: virtual operator "="

N a v a n e e t h2-Jan-09 16:12

N a v a n e e t h

2-Jan-09 16:12

AFAIK, In C++, operator = is not inherited.

Navaneeth

How to use google | Ask smart questions

Catching all exceptions

charlieg2-Jan-09 10:36

charlieg

2-Jan-09 10:36

I'm trying to hook in a master "omg, we're going down, eject, eject, eject!" code chunk into my mfc dialog application. Basically, I do not want the user to see "chg.exe has done something bad and will need to terminate." What I want is to be able to capture as much forensic data to allow me to have a hope to diagnose what caused the crash.

So, in doing my research, I have seen two main approaches - override the run method of the CWinApp:

<br />
<br />
int CMyApp::Run() <br />
{<br />
   BOOL bRun;<br />
   BOOL bExit=FALSE;<br />
<br />
   while(!bExit)<br />
   {<br />
      try<br />
      {<br />
         bRun= CWinApp::Run();<br />
         bExit=TRUE;<br />
      }<br />
      catch (...)<br />
      {<br />
         AfxMessageBox(_T("Exeption!!!"));  // or trace or printf, does not matter.<br />
      }<br />
   }<br />
   return bRun;<br />
}<br />

I've also added the ProcessWndProcException handler at the app level as well.

What I have seen so far is that basically the code is ignored. If I hack up a little dialog app and divide by 0 or try to modify NULL, I see nothing at run time until I try to exit my app. What should one expect from these approaches?

Charlie Gilley
Will program for food...
<italic>Hurtling toward a government of the stupid, by the stupid, for the stupid we go. —Michelle Malkin

Re: Catching all exceptions

Randor 2-Jan-09 11:21

Randor

2-Jan-09 11:21

Research the SetUnhandledExceptionFilter Function[^].

Best Wishes,
-David Delaune

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.