|
i got C2D 8400. Wondering how much this will increase my developing experience and compiling/loading time....
Adrian Pasik
|
|
|
|
|
Und auf deutsch Ich habe den neuen i7 Hammerteil.
ich könnte jetzt mit zahlen um mich werfen, aber das würde nicht das feeling wiedergeben.
Als Trost für alle "unter8" das Biosboot wird wohl mit einem 386nachbau erledigt, und wenn viel am USB-bus -- Bitte warten und Kaffe holen....
Naja das hat auch was gutes Denn nach dem Boot ------> Wusch.... mir fehlen die worte...
|
|
|
|
|
Hey All
I am currently developing installater for my software using Installshield but Installshield not one of the best thing to work with! Had heaps of issues.
I wonder what would one suggest to develop installer with and why!
Sorry for asking this question here.
Thanks
Mohit
modified on Monday, February 23, 2009 4:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
With the math coprocessor?
Or would a modern PC with an nVidea chip count as multiples because of their new API?
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, you’d be in the same boat as the Sx people.
|
|
|
|
|
Is the coprocessor central?
And what about the 486SX I had, once I added the "overdrive" chip?
|
|
|
|
|
oh man...
|
|
|
|
|
i have an intel core 2 duo it is pretty good!
|
|
|
|
|
As I would have thought two is the majority. Now the next question is how many applications can even take advantage of two? Not everyone write true multi-threadde apps.
cheers,
Donsw
My Recent Article : Optimistic Concurrency with C# using the IOC and DI Design Patterns
|
|
|
|
|
That's one thing that will be amazing with Apple's Snow Leopard. It will allow developers to easily take advantage of how many cores the user has.
|
|
|
|
|
The same goes for .Net 4.0
|
|
|
|
|
I have been using 2 processors at home in my main development machine since 1994. This was at first with dual 133 MHz Pentium but I upgraded at least 7 times and all but 1 were more than 1 core. The most expensive upgrade was dual Opteron 250s and 4GB registered of memory in 2005. That ran me over 1100 and the cheapest upgrade was a Quad core Q9550 which I got motherboard + cpu + 6GB of memory + new 650W 80+ power supply for $400 US on black Friday with the help of live.com 30% cash back. Anyways as a programmer I have been writing multi-threaded applications for at least 10 years.
John
modified on Monday, February 23, 2009 8:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
With PLINQ everybody can do dual-core and more
I work on WPF frontends and although they work with async operations all over the place, I can't really say that it is a true multi-core enabled application. The background work is still done on a single thread and I haven't optimized the code for more threads, except of course for the async calls to the backend.
|
|
|
|
|
I use a dual core W2k8 x64 box as my main development machine, and a dual core laptop for admin and mobile stuff. In addition - I run our build server (a dual core W2k3 box), and have another 3 desktop systems (one dual core; 2 single core) and a dual core laptop for testing.
To add to that I've a quad core Q9550 box "on the way" which I'm likely to use alongside the main dev box.
When we put them all into a grid all bets are off, of course. Our code analysis grid has something like 10 agents with up to 24 cores - when it's running full pelt it's rather fun to watch the progress bars zipping along and (hopefully) going green rather than yellow or red.
|
|
|
|
|
When I am not at work or develop for a client of mine, I use a Commodore 128 to write small games or programs. Does that mean that I work on a dual-core computer? Hahaha!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Palavos wrote: When I am not at work or develop for a client of mine, I use a Commodore 128 to write small games or programs. Does that mean that I work on a dual-core computer?
That's 'hard-core' computing to me!. Two extra points if you use CP/M on the C=128
-=[ R ]=-
|
|
|
|
|
Rogelio Perea wrote: Two extra points if you use CP/M on the C=128
Back in the day I bought the manual and software and intended to use that but before I got there I replaced the commodore with a 486.
John
|
|
|
|
|
If I dump one of our Intellect 3.0 screen savers (2 files; scr & dll) on a box, I can drive it from my laptop as a "Voluntary Computing Node", together with all the rest, as one little itty bitty super computer. Otherwise, my lappie just has 2 cores.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that would depend, at least partially, if that was the regular way you handled operations of that machine, or an occasional usage. Since I proved my theories for processing enough that my boss finally put in the requisition for a Tesla, this is how I use the machine, it is its purpose, and its intended and usual function. I am sure others will not appreciate my definition, but hey, it is just a poll. I am using nv280's until my Tesla comes in, still, that is its purpose, its design.
If you use a grid as your regular and everyday workhorse, my feeling is heck yeah, then you can use that as your core count. but who am I but a crazy C/C++ programmer.
modified on Monday, February 23, 2009 1:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
One processor for Vista and its sniffing services and one for me
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
At work on linux I have the and use the ability to build with > 32 cores using a distcc or more recently icecream. This really speeds up building on slower machines. However with zippy quad cores this does not help much since the io becomes more of a bottleneck than the cpu speed.
http://distcc.samba.org/[^]
http://en.opensuse.org/Icecream[^]
John
|
|
|
|
|
I borrow 240 streaming processors from my nVidia... worse, I regularly borrow two sets of them. My work machine has 8 cores, I have access to 64 or more depending on if I activate a grid. Still, when I pull in the nVidia CPUs I can outdo the older 64 node super computer.
|
|
|
|
|
LOL I just knew there's be a "more than 100" answer from you.
|
|
|
|
|
just wait until I get my 4 GPU Tesla... I am already doing fluid dynamics and physics calculations at speeds that exceed any super computer we have ever owned. And I only have one card at work, and two at home. When I get four?
|
|
|
|
|
I bet. Sounds like a fun rig - are you going to put a CB and go-faster stripes on it?
|
|
|
|