|
hehehe  which metal ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Any grounded metal box will serve as a Faraday cage and absorb 100% of the RF signal. This will reduce your range to the volume of the box.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
you mean if I put a grounded tin box on the antenna then the range will go down ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
You have to completely enclose the router and yes. The faraday cage will absorb 100% of the RF, NOTHING will get out. Your signal strength will be zero. It's all or nothing. I was being sarcastic.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
dan neely wrote: I was being sarcastic.
okay...but the thing you told looks good and I have a great idea if that works.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
It won't. If it's not complete you'll just have all the power coming out directionally from where it's leaking.
PS the routers power cord and the cat6 running from the router to the modem will make it leak. 
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
what if I supply 6v instead 12. I'm sure it will die soon.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: A better solution it to filter out unwanted users by using MAC filtering. I know a MAC can be spoofed, but it's rare, and few people know how to do it.
It's a feature in aircrack; so you're really not gaining anything over not broadcasting an SSID or only using WEP. Any of the three will keep your neighbors from connecting accidentally; none will stop a thief for more than a few seconds.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, our server has been using APC Smart-UPS 1500 nearly 3 years. This UPS equip with the software and successfully install it. When I open and logon to its console, I found the following indication:
Insufficient Runtime Available
Discharged battery
Extended undervoltage
Each of indication has its description message which i can't write here (too much) but i found that the status of the UPS is critical.
From here I would like to know whether any problem with my UPS? Is it a problem with the battery of the UPS?
I found this picture http://www.laaudiofile.com/images/smartupsstatus.jpg[^] indicate the normal running of UPS but the for me is not.
Please give me some advice!!!
Thank!!!
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is pretty obviously with the battery:
Extended undervoltage times have lead to activation of the UPS for quite some time. During the undervoltage, your UPS probabvly provided a part of its battery-power as a substitute. If the battery is used, the electrodes disintegrate over time, which leads to reduced runtime.
So, you can fix your UPS by replacing the battery, but that battery probably also will lose performance due to extended undervoltages. Check the UPS regularly, and replace the battery whenever necessary.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
"If it was two men, the non-driver would have challenged the driver to simply crash through the gates. The macho image thing, you know." - Marc Clifton
|
|
|
|
|
Sebastian Schneider wrote: So, you can fix your UPS by replacing the battery, but that battery probably also will lose performance due to extended undervoltages. Check the UPS regularly, and replace the battery whenever necessary.
In my working place, we provide the power from 6am to 6:30pm from Monday to Friday. On Saturday and Sunday there is no electricity. Everyday we leave an office at 5:30pm before the electricity is cutting off. So we can turn off the UPS. When the electricity is cut off the UPS still has power until its finish and this occure everyday.
Is this is the causing problem that made the battery become failure? If I change the battery, does the new battery is going to work well if the electricity is provide with the above mention environment?
Thank for your reply!!!
|
|
|
|
|
The condition of the battery, in my humble opinion, is normal. UPS batteries don't last forever. In my experience, lead-acid batteries only last a few years before they have to be replaced, no matter what the conditions are.
|
|
|
|
|
The UPS is model APC Smart-UPS 1500. When I check for the UPS age its told me 2.93 years old.
According to my provided information, what should I do with this UPS?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you either need to replace the battery or the UPS. The batteries are pretty common and probably cost less than a new UPS.
As Dave and I said, batteries lose capacity over time, and you probably don't want to buy a new UPS every time that happens.
You sound like you want a definitive answer though, so: Replace the battery!
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
"If it was two men, the non-driver would have challenged the driver to simply crash through the gates. The macho image thing, you know." - Marc Clifton
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
Anyone know where can i download iTextSharp.dll (version 4.0.6.0) ??
Thank You
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use below link
http://sourceforge.net/projects/itextsharp/files/
|
|
|
|
|
Compaq E500 running Windows 98SE with built in Infrared that gives an initialization error when opened. What I know:
The original default on an E500 for the Infrared Device is COM3 at address 3E8.Debug shows: F8 03 00 00 E8 03 00 00 – 78 03 00 00 00 00 27 02. So COM1 is 3F8, COM2 is a working Modem, COM3 is 3E8 (Infrared?), COM4 is a mystery. When Infrared is enabled in Windows, serial COM4 is detected as free, but when Infrared is disabled, serial COM4 is not found. This links Infrared with COM4? Infrared Device should be looking for the COM3 address, but instead seems to be associated with COM4. The diagnostics tab in Modems Properties shows COM4 has no address settings. COM3 cannot be found to exist with Modem Doctor or other such programs, but exists in debug, registry, win.ini, etc. There are no IRQ, or other type conflicts. Is this a com port issue, a driver issue, or both?
|
|
|
|
|
It's a driver issue. Devices in the Windows world are software entities; what they're communicating with is irrelevant. Perhaps HP/Compaq support can shed some light on the problem. In my own recent experience, I bought a HP printer and found that none of the drivers supplied worked with Windows 2003 Server. When I called I was told that their printers are intended for home PCs, not servers (I have a server at home). With a little persistence I got them to admit to a secret website where they host a driver for Win2k3 Server; why it's secret I don't understand, but it's there, and the driver works. The point of this is to suggest that, even though the machine and OS may be obsolete, with a little patience and cajoling you might get them to admit that they have a fix you can download.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the definitive answer. I will refocus on the drivers. I tried the trick of reinstalling the Fast Infrared Protocol suggested by Microsoft (didn't work), so that is out of the way. I can move on to the main driver possibilities now. 
|
|
|
|
|
Have you found a solution yet? I'm just curious. A lot of these threads just die without a solution posted, which means that the poster found a fix (best case) or gave up trying (worst case). But since other members might have similar problems it's always good to post a closing comment just so the rest of us can learn from your expeience. I do hope that you found a fix... and please share it with the group.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
Roger,
The answer was as you said, it is a driver issue. I installed the IPX/SPX protocol in networks and three additional files were extracted from the CAB. IR works fine now. However, I notice that if IRMON is unchecked in the Startup, right-clicking and sending to Infrared Recipient produces a null result, the system just hangs. Only opening Infrared Monitor from control panel makes IR Transfer operate when IRMON is not a startup item. Is this because of driver dependencies, i.e. IRMON needs to be loaded during startup and not after startup?
Mr. Noatak
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
