|
|
There is an Articles Needing Approval section that is visible to Gold Members, where we assess the standard of article and try to filter out the crap. Unfortunately for you, there are only 5 articles visible to view in this list - none of which is yours. This doesn't mean that your article isn't there - it just means that others have added articles after yours which need dealing with - it's a LIFO system.
What tends to happen is that there tends to be a period with the crap present because the voting process on articles isn't down to one person. Bad articles need a number of people to report the articles before a moderator removes it.
Now, I'm not saying that yours is a bad article - it's just fallen foul of other people posting after you. Please be patient, and we'll get round to it as soon as possible.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
There - I've just fixed that for you.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
You guys are EXCELLENT!!! (yes, I said EXCELLENT... like Bill & Ted's adventure)
Thank you very very very very very much, its been 8 hours of agony to get my article out. Next time I'll be sure to post the article before I go to sleep instead of as I wake up (ok I'm lying if you check the article history you'll see i was updating like a banshee from 10PM yesterday till 3:30am today ... ie. no sleep for me)
however, i want to raise a concern with this site and everybody reading it... here i was typing my articles to share with the community, not sleeping like my mom says i must. Then because of your LIFO process and limited view of new articles... I caused myself tremendous stress thinking that you don't like my article! so I am hereby warning all users of Code Project NOT to become sleep deprived before you publish your work! I think I got another gray hair. Damn you Code Project!
Thanks again for getting my article through, now I wont stress so much when I do the next one in the series.
|
|
|
|
|
Stephan Johnson wrote: I think I got another gray hair. Damn you Code Project!
Is that where I got all my gray hair? There was me blaming the wife and kids.
Stephan Johnson wrote: Thank you very very very very very much
You're welcome - I'm glad to help.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Article request (hope this is right forum?) - JSON/WCF and WCF Security
I have trouble finding a decent article to show me how to configure web.config (asp.net compat but there should be more) of a WCF Service to be called by asp.net page authenticating with "form-authentication", can't answer question like "Should I declare authentication=forms on my WCF service web.config as well" (it certainly can't be Windows because those are web clients)
Thanks
dev
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve inserted my article and in preview it seems perfect. Unfortunately when I see the final result some tag are showed in the source code. Someone can help me on this? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
This forum is not really meant for problems with articles after they have been submitted, since the CP staff does not regularly check this forum. If you need help with an article already published, you should use the Site Bugs / Suggestions forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Alessandro,
What's your article URL? I'd be happy to help
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your help but someone has already resolved the problem!
Regards
Alessandro
|
|
|
|
|
Hey there,
I submitted an article (the 6th of March) which I want to edit. I have updated the source code and want to change some text in the article. However viewing my article, I cannot find the edit link anymore. I used to have the ability to change my article[^], am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Eduard,
The reason for the difference you are seeing is because your article has been edited by a CP editor. How can you tell? First, the article's header (initially a light blue) changes to yellow/tan; second, if you look at the bottom line of the article page, you will see Editor: Deeksha Shenoy. This is the name of the CP editor who edited your article. You should have been sent an email when this happened.
What this all means is that you can no longer directly edit your article. Instead, you must zip up the download, new article html, and new images, and send them to submit at codeproject.com. Be sure to include the url of your article in the email text. For subject, say "Article update" or something like that. After you send the email, it will take a few days for the update to be processed, depending on how busy the editors are. If you want to check the status, send an email to the same address, asking where it is in the queue.
BTW, this forum is not really meant for problems with articles after they have been submitted, since the CP staff does not regularly check this forum. If you need help with an article already published, you should use the Site Bugs / Suggestions forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Using a C# DLL in an MFC application, indirectly, might be an interesting article for someone?
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, enough brownfields in MFC that could benefit from .NET 
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
Dear friends of CodeProject staff,
I have a question about article competition and about prize assignments.
In march I published the DataGridView filter popup[^] article which received good responses from other CodeProject users.
The latest newsletter announces the winners of march. I agree with the choice of the Perceptor[^] article as best overall article, but I don't agree with the choice of the Multi Remote Desktop Client .NET[^] as the best c# article.
Of course I always appreciate who share something with others but I think that the proposed code is substantially a wapper around a preexisting activex control and that the article content is very laconic.
I am quite disappointed and I would know which are the rules applied in designing the "best" article. I just realized that the rating and popularity indicators don't matter. Nor it doesn't matter if the article proposes an original solution and if it contains a comprehensive explanation.
Considering that every competition provides its rules, I don't understand why you don't make public your rules.
Morever, I don't understand why you don't write the reasons that brought to award an article.
Thank you very much
V.R.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm glad to see you're concerned about article quality, because otherwise I don't think you would have posted this. There are many good reasons why I post articles here, but the article competition isn't one of them. Reason? Because most of the people voting probably have not - and will never - use the article, and therefore haven't a clue about whether the article is useful or not.
Over time, you will get many good comments. Value these, and try to use even the bad comments to improve your articles; the serious members here will notice and appreciate them. I think you know by now that there are many immature members here - don't let these people color your experience. Write for yourself, because you like sharing; for the serious members, because they will appreciate it; and to improve your code, because you will get good comments.
The article competitions are CodeProject's version of beauty pageants; they are superficial and largely meaningless. Just ignore them - I do, and I don't vote in them either.
I hope you will continue to write the very best articles you can.
p.s. The CP admins don't read this forum regularly, so if you really want an answer, you should post in the Site Bugs / Suggestions forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans,
thank you for your answer.
I share my code because I like to think I've done something useful to others and to learn from others.
Which is the measure of the usefulness? Feedbacks like comments, votes and, why not, prizes.
I think everyone is encouraged to do more and better when he or she receives positive feedbacks. The others appreciations is fundamental and a prize is a kind of formal appreciation about the done work.
That said, I'm surprised to read that a serious site like CodeProject adopt superficial and meaningless beauty pageants. Why? Which is the purpose?
I would like one of this three things will be done:
- Competition will be removed at all
- Competition will become serious, with public rules and prize reasons.
- Competition will be explicitelly declared as a facetious roulette game.
I will follow your suggestion, posting my doubts in the Site Bugs / Suggestions forum.
thank you again
Vin
|
|
|
|
|
Try to look past the superficial. Take the long view; in the end, the serious members will give your articles the votes they deserve. You will only make yourself unhappy to expect anything else.
I wish you the best of luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans,
thank you.
you're right.
Vin
|
|
|
|
|
Hey,
Is it possible once and article is moved out of the unedited contributions sections to still ad an author (or co-author) to it?
Cheers
BN
|
|
|
|
|
This is more of a site question than an article-writing question. The CP admins don't look at this forum regularly, so you might want to ask this question on the Site Bugs / Suggestions forum.
p.s. I'm not sure what the answer is, but I suspect it is "Yes - contact a site admin for help". You can contact a site admin by emailing submit at codeproject dot com.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, ty for the help
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Just please send us an e-mail at submit@codeproject.com and we'd be happy to add it for you
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
