|
yashwant vaishnav wrote: please tell me what is better to learn language .Net or java
One is not better over the other (although I'd recommend .NET). They exist for different purposes and cater to different consumers. Read up on both, find out what are the differences, similarities, benefits, odds, etc., of each and figure out what would suit you best.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Ask the same in the Java forum and you will get a different answer...
|
|
|
|
|
I am in dotnet but i recommend java because it is cheaper then dotnet and it is open source based
|
|
|
|
|
Cheaper? Didn't know that you have to pay for the framework...
|
|
|
|
|
Gaurav Dudeja India wrote: java because it is cheaper then dotnet and it is open source based
Are you joking?
Indeed ,could you prove that?Java is not rich as .NET and very sluggish and unstable for some OS.For example MathWorks team warns their customers with something like that "because of the problems with JVM,some functions might not work correctly on some OS".If the development framework is not stable enough,then the product will be full of bugs too.
If it's not rich ,to much custom code is required ,which means much more expensive product.
Life is a stage and we are all actors!
|
|
|
|
|
Java is not cheaper than .net.
Both frameworks are free. You can pay different amounts for the IDE you use, for example SharpDevelop is free and has many good features. There are free (and restricted) versions of Visual Studio as well the versions of visual studio you pay for (it is these that can be expensive). I *think* the free eclipse IDE will also allow you to use .net, it definately supports Mono.
|
|
|
|
|
This is difficult to answer. 
|
|
|
|
|
Learn the theory first and reinforce what you learn using a language. C# or java [C++, smalltalk or even Object COBOL] it really should not matter which language you choose, it is tool for implimentation.
If you really want to learn then try both. At work I use C# and at home java. Both have merrits and both have hindrances. C# is probaly easier to get going with but has inconcistencies that hinder learning the thory. Java is consistent and simple, but you need to learn where things are in the libraries.
As a final thought learn the theory of object orientation from the outside in. Start with design and learn UML diagraming and notation. Get it in your head that being language agnostic is the best approach.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
Define 'better'.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Is .NET a language? How can you compare .NET and Java? It makes sense to compare C# and Java not .NET and Java.
|
|
|
|
|
C# is the better language*, we just need to get a compiler that will compile C# to work with the Java VM. 
But that has nothing to do with which would be better for you to learn.
* Really, it is; in C# we can compare the contents of two strings with the equals (==) operator rather than calling an Equals method  .**
** On the other hand, Java is better because there, methods are virtual by default, whereas in C# they're not .
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have one software which gives me 10 digit Number for date. How could I convert that 10 digit number to actual date.
Example :- The output given by software is 1251983760 for the date 03-09-2009.
Please help me to convert that number to actual date.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a .NET expert, but I'm assuming that the numeric value corresponds to number of ticks (from some standard base time?) Have you looked at the constructors of DateTime[^] structure?
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
can be the seconds since 1970/01/01 (or maybe 1969/12/31)
|
|
|
|
|
I tried it: it´s the number of seconds since 1970/01/01 00:00
DateTime smq = new DateTime(1970, 1, 1);
Console.WriteLine("Date {0} + {1} seconds = {2}", smq.ToString(), 1251983760.ToString(), smq.AddSeconds(1251983760).ToString());
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks bro. That number was in seconds since 1970/01/01 00:00;
|
|
|
|
|
Happy to see you posting on C# forum. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I've started to lurk here to see if I can learn something new (the plan of learning .NET properly, which I had been procrastinating for a very long time).
While in the process of reading posts and leeching knowledge off the C# Gurus, I may answer a couple of easy posts, being wrong here and there. You guys must be watchful and warn me on such occasions! 
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
how to use message box in webApplication.
|
|
|
|
|
So the title references ASP and the body references ASP.
So why isn't this in the ASP forum?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
You choose wrong category,
with the use of alert javascript you can use message box in asp.net
|
|
|
|
|
Use the client side script JavaScript or VbScript Both work on client side , but i recommend javascript because it is more common.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not able to add rows n values to data gridview programmatically(without binding to datasource)..I think the problem is because the rows are assigned 'databound' property...Any alternative for 'databound' so that i can add values programmatically?
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think that there is something else than databound? But the question is why dont you want to use databound??
|
|
|
|
|
i dnt want to use databound because i am adding values to datatable on each buttonclick...if databinding is used the firstly written values will get refreshd
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
