|
Why don't you try doing what I say, and report back if you have any issues ? If you don't have any connection strings in there, or other paths that would change, then you shouldn't need to change it, no.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
|
|
|
|
|
after i change the RemoteOnly to off it shows the same error
|
|
|
|
|
You will need to work out how to get it to show you the actual error in order to fix it. Can you log into the server and view it there ? If not, check the settings, but I suspect it's cached the web.config and needs to be reset in order to show you the real error.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
i cont understand, can pls tell me clearly
|
|
|
|
|
If you changed the web.config on the server, it's possible the server is still reading the old version because of some sort of cache. Beyond that, you need to work out why it's not showing you the actual error, or you can't do anything to fix it. If you could either log in to the server, or go to it physically, the right error would show if you browsed to the site from the server.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
i logged in to the server and i saw the web.config file i change the RemoteOnly to Off inside <configuration> tag but same error display
|
|
|
|
|
if i change the content of the web.config file like this
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
its shows error like this
Server Error in '/' Application.
Parser Error
Description: An error occurred during the parsing of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific parse error details and modify your source file appropriately.
Parser Error Message: Could not load type '_Default'.
Source Error:
Line 1: <%@ Page Language="VB" AutoEventWireup="false" CodeFile="Default.aspx.vb" Inherits="_Default" %>
Line 2:
Line 3: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
Source File: f:\inetpub\suntvaus\Default.aspx Line: 1
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.2300; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.2300
|
|
|
|
|
To reiterate ( for the third time ), if you can log into the server, as in, control the server somehow, then yuo should browse to your site within the server. Then you will see the error. Beyond that, you need to work out how to fix your web.config, or if you're sure you have and that you saved it correctly, you need to reset your server. Could you have your site in the subdirectory of where the web server is looking ? Perhaps it's seeing an error somewhere other than where you put your code ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
after making all the changes,if u have changed config file too u need to reset the iis before runing it
so reset the iis and then run it,
praveen.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys need ur advise !
I am currently developing a ASP.net. However i realise an issue is that
When Person A log in to See Details of A1 record if Person B log in to see Details of B1. When A refresh it will see Details of B1 instead of A1. It Some how when B log in , the parameter of B overwrited A
Any idea to resolve without using Session? Or Session is the only way to handle multi user at one time?
if thats' the case all my variable need to be in Session?
Please advise. Thanks a million bro
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like you're using static variables, otherwise there's no reason for this to happen. The record you're viewing, is usually stored on the URL, and the current user is stored in the session.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
What about Global Variable? It will have the same effect as static?
Will Object Oriented be a solution for Multi User at One Time ?
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
HatakeKaKaShi wrote: What about Global Variable?
That would obviously be stupid.
HatakeKaKaShi wrote: Will Object Oriented be a solution for Multi User at One Time ?
Sounds to me like you are very, very lost. You should buy a basic ASP.NET book and read it. You've done things very wrong if you have the problem you're describing. Is this for homework, or for your job ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah i am kind of lost and i know  I am in deep trouble! Is for my job
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so how did you get to have a job that you have no idea how to do ?
How about you post some code so we can try to give some specific advice ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
ok for example
when i gotten the record id
i will store as
static string Record_ID = record id
so i can use it in the page functions with out declaring or retrieve the record id again
like Button_Click1 or any other funtion
So if i am not mistaken this will only work on window app am i correct ?
so now instead of storing as static i will have to
use Session["RecordID"] = record id
or once again retieve the Retrieve the ID in every function i need?
is that the way to do it?
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
HatakeKaKaShi wrote: static string Record_ID = record id
so i can use it in the page functions with out declaring or retrieve the record id again
This is very wrong.
1 - static means it's visible to all users, that is what static does, windows or web
2 - either way, the variable does not persist between page loads anyhow, you need to use viewstate for that. session is to store values between pages, but it's better to put them on the URL if you can.
HatakeKaKaShi wrote: or once again retieve the Retrieve the ID in every function i need?
If you load the value in page load, it will remain the same for that page lifecycle. It just resets every time a page is requested. If your page shows a record, putting the id on the URL makes the most sense.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks bro
But i need to store quite a number of variable if i put it all in the URL it will be very long
So i think Session variable will do right?
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
You need to store a whole lot of variables for each user ? Why so many ? A query string can be reasonably long. Session is OK, but I try to avoid using it where I can. The thing about a querystring too is, it means the exact page can be bookmarked, as the right page will build itself from the URL.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
alright thanks bro i get when u mean. Yup i have a lot of variables some are being pass through to class function or next page. Bro another question is u dun mind.
if i declare a variable with in a function
let say
protected void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string RecordID = Request.QueryString("RecordID");
Class class = new Class; //Class I Created
DataSet = class.ReturnDS(RecordID); //Function within the Class
}
if there are mutiple user using is
will the RecordID being Mix up again Showing person A Detail of B1 After both person trigger the same function?
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
HatakeKaKaShi wrote: will the RecordID being Mix up again Showing person A Detail of B1 After both person trigger the same function?
No, each users pages get generated using different instances of this class, only statics will get mixed up between users.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|
Alright Thanks bro. Now i have a clear picture now.
Thanks a lot man
KaKaShi HaTaKe
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: either way, the variable does not persist between page loads anyhow, you need to use viewstate for that. session is to store values between pages, but it's better to put them on the URL if you can.
Correct me if I am wrong, static variables will stay alive until the application domain unloads and will persist across post-backs.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi..
1) I was trying to create a IF Condition in stored procedure where i need to compare if old value and new value is present/not present in the database. Dont know the Syntax to write the above said query in Stored procedure.
2) I have created a variabl name 'add', 'change', 'remove'. The old value and new value are two different columns in the table. What i want is : If old value is null and new value is present then 'add' get incremented by 1, if old value is present and it has been modified in new value and if the old value string does not match with the new value then 'change' get incremented by 1, if old value is present and it has bee deleted in new value then 'remove' get incremented by 1.
Kindly help me out as early as possible as these is where i stuck for the last few days and i need to resolve this soon.
Abhishek
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
