|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: also have a netbook, but it is really good only for travel. The screen and the keyboard are just too small for productive work.
but good for gaming 
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You
|
|
|
|
|
flash is not real gaming. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
How do you keep all your data in sync between your computers?
|
|
|
|
|
I use the beast when the comfort of my buttocks is given higher consideration than that of my fingers.
Oh, yeah - and when I need to relocate for some reason or another.
Ramble Initiated:
Observation: The new generation (i.e., my spawn) don't have land-line phones, and similarly (it seems) don't have desktop PCs. I could account for it, to some extent, as a need for mobility. Now, I think it's a lack of appreciation of what it is they're missing.
Then, too, most people don't have as many PCs laying around the house as "We of Code Project" are likely to have.
:Ramble completed
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert
"It's a sad state of affairs, indeed, when you start reading my tag lines for some sort of enlightenment. Sadder still, if that's where you need to find it." - Balboos HaGadol
|
|
|
|
|
..these days laptops are powerful enough for anything 
peace & serenity
|
|
|
|
|
|
My dual GTX 280M work like a charm in my laptop, so I don't see the point of your argument there...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but unfortunately NOT ALL laptops are equipped with such powerful GPU...
Bye By(t)e 
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, really??? Thanks for letting me know! I thought ALLLLL laptops had powerful cards...  Seriously I realize that... I' simply pointing out that there ARE laptops out there that CAN run powerful games or multimedia apps out there. LOL!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a given price, you can always buy desktop pc that is faster than a laptop, especially in terms of disk speeds. This makes a significant difference to build times during development. So I reluctantly use our "high spec" laptops for development only when forced to develop off site.
|
|
|
|
|
I regularly use a desktop PC through RDP: enough power, but the flexibility to work at any place that has an internet connection.
|
|
|
|
|
Try connecting 4 screens to your laptop without much hassle or problems or extra external hardware
Yes laptops have gotten to be close to being as powerful (at least the decant one's and not the 'throw away' laptops that go for 300€) but I still prefer the desktop.
More scalability and such.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are doing development, that is not too hard these days, as long as you are not looking for great graphics performance (or even good...). They have some not back USB and whatever-the-new-PCMCIA-replacment-is-called dongles for it.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah but there crap 
Good for displaying only text and such but when your doing something even slightly more graphic they can't cope and only your main screen is able to display them.
I almost always have something graphical open (it's my home pc that has 4 screens) so...
I'm not saying laptops aren't useful but in my opinion they'll never replace the desktop.
|
|
|
|
|
My notebook is my main computer. I don't even have a desktop computer at home for some long five years now (and don't miss it either).
[]'s
Harkos
---
"Money isn't our god, integrity will free our soul."
Cut Throat - Sepultura
|
|
|
|
|
If they had a display .... Notebook display quality has dropped dramatically in last two years without any options. You could get ThinkPad with IPS 15" 1600x1200 panel and contrast ratio better than 500:1 five years ago. Now only horrible TN panels with poor contrast ratio below 150:1 are available which might be good for a mobile phone but definitely NOT for a computer I should have use for several hours per day. Lets talk about real monitors with S-PVA or H-IPS panel, 12 bit LUT and backlight uniformity compensation 
|
|
|
|
|
For me its about productivity. On a desktop with a normal sized keyboard and display I typically churn out 300 to 1500 c++ lines per day when coding. On a laptop this is cut down to 100 to 300. The keyboard and display are both too small. The hard disk (unless it is a high end SSD) is too slow and the mouse sucks.
John
modified on Monday, November 30, 2009 9:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a laptop. Never really needed them. If ever get a desktop it will be for work, never for gaming. Even for work, the price compared to desktop is too high for the same performance. So, only if I really need one.
And the mouse and keyboard suck. It takes forever to point at stuff with the little pad of the notebook, and misclicks are a common event. The keys are usually too small, leading to many mistyping. If you atach external devices, it defeats part of the laptop's purpose of mobility (you need a good flat surface for an external mouse or keyboard) that you don't always have available.
I have a desktop at home and a desktop at work. I'm good.
|
|
|
|
|
It is not about computer power, but comfort and productivity. The only way a laptop comes close to a desktop when it comes to productivity is to use it in a desktop manner - with external keyboard and monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
Long as you don't mind the noise and small screen
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the responses to this are a bit ridiculous. People saying they lose up to 80% productivity must be full of it. Sure the keyboards tend to be more squished together but that is just something you get used to after a week of use or so. The mouse pads are way better than external mice and much quieter as long as taps are treated as clicks. Not to mention the boost in productivity you get from being able to work without even getting out of bed or during the commute if you utilize public transportation.
Desktops are better for games, but who has time for games?
|
|
|
|
|
SlingBlade wrote: The mouse pads are way better than external mice and much quieter as long as taps are treated as clicks.
The spontanious random click generator is the single biggest reason touchpads suck and are one of the main reasons why a certain major computer companies hardware will never foul my abode.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I have a thinkpad T42 that NEVER has this kind of problem with the mouse pad, and I have used Dells that really are random click generators.
It depends on the machine,and it matters how often you use it,you have to get good with it,or it will continue to suck forever.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
SlingBlade wrote: something you get used to after a week of use or so.
I have not gotten used to the laptop keyboard after 8 years and 3 laptops. Some of my fingers are wider than the keys on my laptop and thus I often get the wrong letter. Also then there is the random jump. I mean while typing sometimes if I bump near the touchpad area the cursor jumps to a random location on the screen. This happens usually while I am typing an email or something and its very frustrating.
John
modified on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 11:39 AM
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
