|
Dalek Dave wrote: 3.00 pm the American lot are getting here
Hey now, some of the folks are Canadian.
Heh. Canadians.
|
|
|
|
|
America is not USA.
North America is USA and Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote: America IS USA.
North America is USA and Canada.
FTFY
You are trying too hard.
Settle down and let stuff go. 
|
|
|
|
|
ragnaroknrol wrote: Cpianism wrote:
America IS not just USA.
FTFTFY------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Your next response was correct.
People don't refer to Canada or Mexico as America.
North America is Canada, Mexico and possibly includes the islands in the Carribean, though most folks do not include them.
South America is never referred to as America. No country there gets labeled as "America"
Nor is any country in Central America.
My whole point is that the only place people refer to as America is the USA. Considering there are only 3 countries on this continent, it is pretty easy to simple name each of them.
|
|
|
|
|
ragnaroknrol wrote: North America is Canada and USA.
FTFY  Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Meech wrote: ragnaroknrol wrote:
North America is Canada, Mexico, and USA.
Actually...
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote:
North America is USA and Canada and Mexico.
FTFY------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Why lounge sucks today 
I'm posting in the lounge but when I refrsh the page I find that my posts are gone  It happened to me with 3 posts tell now and I still can't find them.
|
|
|
|
|
| Adding to this, seeing this now. Only when being served by Web21 from what I can tell. However, the Lounge only seems to be getting served by Web21 unless I post a reply. He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.
|
|
|
|
|
| FF3.5.3 the bottom row or three of pixels are being cut off. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
| Can you please send me a screenshot? Also, which page (the forum post page or Quick Answers post page) cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
forum page. Screenshot sent.
PS Did you know that closing a gmail tab while it's trying to upload a file will apparently lock FF up? Stupid webfilters.  3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: while it's trying to upload a file will apparently lock FF up?
I believe it might be because of Flash bug. Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought gmail was pure ajax.  3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Do the hamsters have any rationale for how to deal with outdated articles? I think it would be a good idea to give the author the option to mark them as obsolete after, say, a year from it first being posted. Read this thread to see a good example of why this would be useful. You could perhaps do the following for obsolete articles:
1) Disallow further voting on them.
2) Remove them from default search results, but give an option to include obsolete articles in search results.
3) Style them differently (to make it apparent they are obsolete) and post a notice at the top that says "this article is obsolete and you may want to check out these other articles instead".
You might also have some method of automatically marking an article as obsolete (say, automatically mark it obsolete 5 years after the latest update).
|
|
|
|
|
I don't agree that an article could be "obsolete" in the strictest definition of the word. Besides, if the author thinks it's obsolete, he could always delete it..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
An author might want to keep the article on display for, say, a resume to point to, but might also not want an outdated article to lower reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
I have articles that haven't been voted on in years. Deleting those articles would mean a reduction of 100 reputation points each.
My point was that just because the author isn't working in that particular discipline any longer doesn't mean that the article isn't relevant for someone else..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: a reduction of 100 author reputation points each
An important distinction (or one that my become important).
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: My point was that just because the author isn't working in that particular discipline any longer doesn't mean that the article isn't relevant for someone else.
Perhaps. What if the purpose of the article is better satisfied by an updated article written by somebody else? Like the example I gave. Somebody wrote an article about screen scraping Google to get a language translation. Now Google provides an API to do that, so screen scraping is no longer necessary. The primary purpose of the article was to use Google to translate text, so the purpose is better satisfied by a newer article that makes use of the Google API. Sure, some may find it useful that the article provides some information on screen scraping, but that wasn't really the purpose of the article. I'd say it should be up to the author to decide when their article is obsolete, but still give them them option of hosting it on Code Project. And deprecating an article doesn't only benefit the author (better article rating), but it helps others that may otherwise run across the article and be annoyed that the topic is outdated.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's up to the author, but the article might otherwise contain some technique that could be used elsewhere, even if it's only a basis for another idea.
I don't see a use, but as long as only the author can mark his article as obsolete, I don't care if it's implemented or not..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| Author might also want to keep article to get it back some day if he lost his local copy [^] "Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something." Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
|
One of the purposes of marking an article obsolete would be that the author could leave it posted on Code Project. Some say obsolete articles should be deleted... I don't. I say obsolete articles should be left on Code Project but they should basically be segregated from other articles.
|
|
|
|
|
Some stuff just doesn't become obselete even as technology/tools/APIs change. Giving the author only the option to request it to be flagged as obselete may be a good idea in rare cases but on the whole - if the article is of any worth, the general principles/techniques will probably still be applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. I suspect my two articles will never become obsolete because they are focused on the algorithm, not the technology. I see no harm in giving the author the option of marking the article obsolete (aside from the work of implementing it).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
