|
sign up != sign in
sign up = create account
each account can sign up only once.
 Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Luc,
I meant the same. Sign up == Create account, which will happen once only.
200 that i said was about logging into my account in last 4.5 years.
So:
Creation of account (1 time) = 100
Winning a competition (won 1), thus = 200
Logged in into CP in last 4.5 years (cant say, assuming 200+ times - 1 per day) = 200+
======================================
In total Participation point expected = 500+
Currently it is < 200 (if debator 0 then 191 around, or else 146 aroung)
Hope I was able to clear the doubt i have.
Thanks,
Sandeep.
|
|
|
|
|
| wll look into this cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Were you able to look into it?
|
|
|
|
|
| We've reworked the system a little and I'll rerun the re-population script this weekend to see if we can pick up the missing points. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like the script is running right now!
|
|
|
|
|
| Yes. Give it a couple more hours. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Issue still persists. My Participant points are 159 only.
One more thing that i noticed today. Looks like not always we get 1 point on logging into our code project account (daily login participation!). I am logging in daily from around last 2 months, but it doesn't look like that my participant points increase proportionately. Though i am not sure. I will track it for few days and confirm if needed.
Can you please look into it.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
| Competition winner has now been moved into the "Author" points section. You have 159 points which sounds about spot on for your reputation. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In that case i don't see any jump in my Author points from last few days to now. (around 3700 last few days and now)
Was the competition points already added to Author from before? If yes then it's fine that there is no change but If not then one need to look into it.
|
|
|
|
|
| We reran everything over the weekend but it slipped through the cracks. We're looking into it. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Should be a caching issue. I see your current reputation is > 6K.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
As Chirs told, the reputation got re-stored in the morning today (IST 9am).
It was not caching issue. As told, there is a new algorithm to calculate it. That was under process.
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: As Chirs told, the reputation got re-stored in the morning today (IST 9am).
Yes, but you had posted your previous message 3 hours back (which is after 9am IST), by then which the reputation was already updated.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
The previous message is about WRONG calculation of Participation reputation which still exists. And that is not caching for sure.
Rest all are restored. You can check the calculation as per Reputation FAQ for verification sake.
|
|
|
|
|
reputation sure is.
 Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. I've had mine move from about 5,000 to 130.
|
|
|
|
|
The historical data is scanned again, in chronological order.
The same just happened yesterday to fix a bug I noticed influencing this year's contributions, resulting in more participation and debator points.
You can enjoy the show by refreshing CG's rep graph once a minute or so; it'll take a couple of hours!
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
And now the debator points, growing stronger than ever, have suddenly disappeared???
[EDIT]
And they are back...
[/EDIT]
 Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
it is done, once more.
my total rep grew 25% with no effort from my side, why still write articles and messages?  Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
modified on Sunday, February 21, 2010 6:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
You're having a slow, lazy Sunday, eh Luc?  cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There weren't many posts, so I've mostly been watching the hamsters work very hard. Which is fine for a Sunday...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the following needs to be done:-
1. Original Author of that message still sees the message, in other words he still thinks that the message exists. Seeing “Message is Removed” seems to give trolls more food to troll.
2. Other users should not see that message, may be it can be a setting in the profile (don’t show me removed messages/threads)
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree with your point #1. This has been suggested in the past (by me and others) several times.
As for #2, I think seeing "message automatically removed" serves as a notice to all that the poster should be monitored for any recurrent objectionable posts. I'm always willing to give someone the benefit of a doubt, but not when it happens two or three times.
|
|
|
|
|
We made a recent change that now allows us to do this. I'll bump up this a little to get it done faster.
However, it will only work for newer (last couple of months) messages, not all messages.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
