|
"Best" in what way?
Since I have no specifications, I'd probably use something quick and dirty like
int n = 1024;
int d = 2;
int ds = int.Parse(n.ToString().Substring(d,1));
etc.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot to mention that I was working on arduino
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh, now we have some specifications! 
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Convert the number to string
Loop through the characters, store it.
Eg :
<pre>
Dim digits As New ArrayList
For Each digit As Char in CStr(number)
digits.Add(CInt(digit))
End For
</pre>
|
|
|
|
|
like others have said, a loop containing a modulo 10 and a divide by 10, are what is required. Assembly programming may give access to an instruction that does both operations in one, something higher-level languages typically don't exploit.
You probably don't want any leading zeroes, so you should exit the loop as soon as the quotient is zero, but you still need to output the current remainder, i.e. the test belongs at the bottom of the loop as you want at least one digit.
Keep in mind that the number has to be positive for all of this to work correctly; for negative numbers, you need to "negate" first.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
After a long trying, I found this snippet:
int number = 1024;
int digit1 = ((number / 1000) % 10);
int digit2 = ((number / 100) % 10);
int digit3 = ((number / 10) % 10);
int digit4 = ((number / 1) % 10);
|
|
|
|
|
ant-damage wrote: After a long trying, I found this snippet:
... which is great until you give it a number like 456789.
Or if you try it with 23, you'll end up with zeroes.
As others have said, a loop will work no matter what number you throw at it.
Days spent at sea are not deducted from one's alloted span - Phoenician proverb
|
|
|
|
|
You were right. I've just created a test program to see if that piece of code was doing its paper.
I made the test so that it writes to a file the number of failed comparisions.
The result file had 200MB of length, so I think it's better to create a new algorithm to do that
|
|
|
|
|
Please show me an example of what you saying.
I'm not american nor british.
|
|
|
|
|
ant-damage wrote: I'm not american nor british
I'll give you an example implementation in pseudo-code then:
arrayOfInts ToDigits(int value) {
bool negative=value<0;
if (negative) value=-value;
ListOfInts digits=new ListOfInts;
do {
int mod=value%10;
digits.Add(mod);
value/=10;
} while (value!=0);
if (negative) digits.Add(specialCodeForMinusSign);
return digits.Reverse.ToArray;
}
PS: I am aware it would fail when fed int.MinValue
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
What the purpose of this algorithm?
Do you ever saw those 7-segment led displays in your tv, stereo hi-fi, vcr or dvd?
I have one of those but with 4 digits in one display, and those digits are in multiplexed mode, so I can only iterate with one at a time.
I won't use negative numbers, because I will use that display to make a digital counter/timer.
By the way, thanks for the example. I'm now ready to create an optimized one.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh great. This thread holds 20 messages already, and now you come with some details. I'm out of here.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't remove messages that have replies attached; it is against the forum guidelines.
I copied your original question here:
Hi
I need help to find the best snippet to extract individual digits from an integer.
Here is an example of what I want to do:
int number = 1024;
int digit1 = 1;
int digit2 = 0;
int digit3 = 2;
int digit4 = 4;
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
int source
int digit
while source
{
digit = source % 10
output digit
source /= 10
}
get u started
Tadeusz Westawic
Sum quid sum.
|
|
|
|
|
there is no need to start this thread all over again.
My message to the OP was: don't remove what you wrote, which, for the curious, is: "..."
|
|
|
|
|
we call it sprintf.
(Does Arduino provide it?)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
unfortunately that is not an algorithm, nor the name of an algorithm.
however, if it is meant as a suggestion to have a look at an sprintf implementation, it is a valid one, as there are umpteen implementations available; almost any microprocessor vendor or open source kernel offers one.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: unfortunately that is not an algorithm, nor the name of an algorithm.
I know. 
Luc Pattyn wrote: almost any microprocessor vendor or open source kernel offers one.
That's the point, there's no need to look at the function implementation details (well, actually there is "curiosity"), my suggestion was: "use sprintf" that is already optimized (the algorithm then becomes trivial, just subtract '0' to every character...).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
isn't sprintf language specific? Unless the OP has very good knowledge of C or in case he is programming in some high level language like python, your answer will be greek to him. Consider explaining the 'optimized' algorithm of sprintf to him instead...
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, now I see the OP convincing Arduino it can run Python code...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I use C++ to make programs for my arduino
Of course, arduino's library collection includes sprintf() in stdio.h
By the way it is a c++ compiler
|
|
|
|
|
ant-damage wrote: I use C++ to make programs for my arduino
ant-damage wrote: By the way it is a c++ compiler
Did you use C++? 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
of course I do
Which programming language could be better to be used along the arduino? C++
|
|
|
|
|
Given two integers, x & y, is it possible to tell a number Z such that Z = f(x,y) and Z is unique for all x,y?
*Edit : f(x) + f(y) --> f(x,y)
modified on Saturday, May 15, 2010 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I think you mean: is there a function f(x) such that, for different pairs (x,y), the value of f(x)+f(y) will always be different, where x and y are arbitrary integer numbers (negative or positive, and not restricted to a finite domain). Different pairs here has to be taken independent of order.
If that is what you meant, the answer IMO would be no. I'd want you to confirm my interpretation first though.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
